jerryc41 wrote:
It seems that a lot of Mac users, even instructors on YouTube, use external drives for holding their images on a Mac. Is this because the iMac has only one internal drive and fills up fast, or is there an advantage to having images on an external drive?
Yesterday, I copied my images to my iMac, and the drive is a little more than half full, so I'm thinking about using an external drive. Then I could use that drive to edit on my Mac or Windows machine.
Jerry, you have struck a nerve with ALL computer users who store photographs, not just MAC users. Personally, I use an external because of travel constraints. I carry a MacBook Air for portability. I use a WD 3 tb drive for the same reason. It is attached to the iMac at this time, and it travels with me when I use the MacBook Air. 3 tbs holds a lot of photos, and if it fills, WD makes more drives. I also carry a few WD 2 tb portable drives just for spares. My first HD was a whopping 20 MBs! I was sure I would never fill it. Surprise! Each photograph I make requires space for the jpeg image and the CRW file, usually from 30-35 mbs. They add up and after a while the drive gets full. With the cost of drives being so low they are easy and convenient to use as extras. Besides, the portable WD 2tb drives fit in a shirt pocket. They used to fill a wheel barrow. I'm grateful for technology.