Tamron 35mm 1.8 prime vs. 45mm 1.8 prime.
Nov 23, 2015 16:46:53 #
rocketride wrote:
The main difference beside focal length is that the Tammies have whatever they call their version of VR.
I may be wrong but for a prime 35mm it is the only lens with VR for Nikon.
Nov 23, 2015 20:06:53 #
icemncmth wrote:
I may be wrong but for a prime 35mm it is the only lens with VR for Nikon.
AFAIK, you're right, but I'm not that 'up' on Nikon's offerings. I'm a Canon guy. (I don't want to get into a C vs.N. argument. Near as I can figure, the brands are about equally good.)
Nov 23, 2015 20:18:23 #
rocketride wrote:
AFAIK, you're right, but I'm not that 'up' on Nikon's offerings. I'm a Canon guy. (I don't want to get into a C vs.N. argument. Near as I can figure, the brands are about equally good.)
I agree...I like both brands but I grew up usings Nikon F's...FE...FM FM2T etc.
Nov 23, 2015 21:58:27 #
icemncmth wrote:
I agree...I like both brands but I grew up usings Nikon F's...FE...FM FM2T etc.
I grew up on Olympus film SLRs but when I went digital, Canon had the upper hand for astrophotography. Now they're about equal there, too. (Actually, Nikon's ahead now, having recently fielded a FF astronomy-specialized body. Canon, we need a 6Da, are you listening?)
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.