Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
What happened?
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Nov 18, 2015 23:16:50   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Can someone tell me what happened here? I took a picture of the moon using flash (just experimenting). This is what I got. I checked the properties after downloading and noticed the metering was listed as pattern. What did I do to get this? Sorry it has motion blur. It was handheld.

I took this with my D7100 using my tamron 16-300
I took this with my D7100 using my tamron 16-300...
(Download)

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:23:31   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Were you shooting through a window?
What did you expect the flash to do for the photo?
If you shot through the window, the flash would have been reflected right back into the lens causing massive flare.

Reminds me of partial solarisation.
"Solarisation (or solarization) is a phenomenon in photography in which the image recorded on a negative or on a photographic print is wholly or partially reversed in tone. Dark areas appear light or light areas appear dark."

Nikon D7100
1/60th ISO 1600
300mm @ 6.3

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:29:10   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
What camera. This looks to be some sort of "art" filter.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2015 23:33:51   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Were you shooting through a window?
What did you expect the flash to do for the photo?

Reminds me of partial solarisation.
"Solarisation (or solarization) is a phenomenon in photography in which the image recorded on a negative or on a photographic print is wholly or partially reversed in tone. Dark areas appear light or light areas appear dark."

Nikon D7100
1/60th ISO 1600
300mm @ 6.3

I was not shooting through a window. I was outside. As to what I expected the flash to do, nothing - just curious.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:34:13   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
What camera. This looks to be some sort of "art" filter.


D7100

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:34:40   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
I think it is the famous Paper Moon.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:39:03   #
SnappyHappy Loc: Chapin, SC “The Capitol of Lake Murray”
 
I've never seen anything like this before and I've been to two worlds fairs and a ..... thats a story for another time and place :XD: Were you using a cheese cloth to diffuse your flash?

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2015 23:40:48   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
retired2014 wrote:
I was not shooting through a window. I was outside. As to what I expected the flash to do, nothing - just curious.
One never gets anywhere without curiosity!
Using the Inverse Square Law your flash will never lighten up the dark side of the moon, even if you listen to Pink Floyd's album.

Ballpark exposure for the moon in that phase is going to be:
ISO 200, Aperture f/11, Shutter Speed 1/250 + or -
...and no flash.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:45:10   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
SnappyHappy wrote:
I've never seen anything like this before and I've been to two worlds fairs and a ..... thats a story for another time and place :XD: Were you using a cheese cloth to diffuse your flash?


No, I didn't use anything over the flash. I used the on camera flash.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:49:43   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
retired2014 wrote:
No, I didn't use anything over the flash. I used the on camera flash.


Not sure where you are, but Evansville is almost always humid, in my experience.
Maybe the flash illuminated the water droplets in the air causing them to brighten.
That, combined with the gross overexposure got the effect you see?

Can I call a friend?

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:50:11   #
letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.
 
retired2014 wrote:
Can someone tell me what happened here? I took a picture of the moon using flash (just experimenting). This is what I got. I checked the properties after downloading and noticed the metering was listed as pattern. What did I do to get this? Sorry it has motion blur. It was handheld.


It is greatly over exposed and we are surely looking at a huge crop.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2015 23:54:08   #
SnappyHappy Loc: Chapin, SC “The Capitol of Lake Murray”
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
One never gets anywhere without curiosity!
Using the Inverse Square Law your flash will never lighten up the dark side of the moon, even if you listen to Pink Floyd's album.

Ballpark exposure for the moon in that phase is going to be:
ISO 200, Aperture f/11, Shutter Speed 1/250 + or -
...and no flash.


Goofy you have given away your age by referring to Pink Floyds "album" ( also by referring to Pink Floyd in the first place). So I'll give away mine, what if we played it backwards and at 45 rpm? That changes everything, now we have a shot at tweeting the light even on the dark side.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:55:50   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
SnappyHappy wrote:
Goofy you have given away your age by referring to Pink Floyds "album" ( also by referring to Pink Floyd in the first place). So I'll give away mine, what if we played it backwards and at 45 rpm? That changes everything, now we have a shot at tweeting the light even on the dark side.



HA!!!
Still won't overcome physics, but it could be fun.
Paul McCartney is still alive, BTW.

:lol: :wink:

Hey, I lived in Rome...NY.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:56:20   #
retired2014 Loc: Indiana
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Not sure where you are, but Evansville is almost always humid, in my experience.
Maybe the flash illuminated the water droplets in the air causing them to brighten. That, combined with the gross overexposure got the effect you see?

Can I call a friend?


Sure, call a friend. I was in Wadesville Indiana (near Evansville) when I took this shot.

Reply
Nov 18, 2015 23:56:32   #
NormPR
 
Did you try it without the flash?? I think the humidity, as mentioned above, may be the problem.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.