If We are forced to take in refugees - then why not
Nov 18, 2015 12:45:21 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
Why not put them in a special "camp" like we did the American Japenese in California till they can be screened and cleared... There are more than enough closed military camps with barracks and or quarters that would comfortable hold them... Highly doubt the "o" has the authority to tell us how and where to put them....
Nov 18, 2015 12:47:16 #
Nov 18, 2015 12:59:05 #
Nov 18, 2015 13:04:36 #
green wrote:
there's a few openings in guantanamo :)
:thumbup: :thumbup:
There is also a 'tent' city in Saudi Arabia that will house 3 million people. They have running water, electricity and every 'tent' is air conditioned.
The city is vacant.
There is not one refugee in Saudi Arabia.
Nov 18, 2015 13:05:55 #
EX-TELCO wrote:
WTF? This is home of the BRAVE?
Yep, not home of the stupid...
unless you are a politician or liberal.
Nov 18, 2015 13:16:53 #
bvm
Loc: Glendale, Arizona
green wrote:
there's a few openings in guantanamo :)
Wow, what an original idea!
Nov 18, 2015 13:25:03 #
It seems that we have an overall issue pertaining to "immigrants" often because they feed our public assistance costs.
I'm thinking that the whole of immigration policies,use wh**ever label you wish,should be "paused." To me,a new category is a moot point.
I'm thinking that the whole of immigration policies,use wh**ever label you wish,should be "paused." To me,a new category is a moot point.
Nov 18, 2015 15:20:05 #
EX-TELCO wrote:
WTF? This is home of the BRAVE?
We know you are an i***t by your Hillary avatar. So we expect little from you.
Nov 18, 2015 16:14:56 #
EX-TELCO wrote:
WTF? This is home of the BRAVE?
Yes, we are the home of the BRAVE! So lets not be stupid and become the home of the beheaded.
Nov 18, 2015 17:59:01 #
Nov 18, 2015 20:38:25 #
bvm
Loc: Glendale, Arizona
donrent wrote:
You posters have NO idea what the "interment" could do , do you...
You mean like the Germans and Italians who winded up there, because they would not take an oath of allegiance to the US. I think there were about 5-7K Italians and 11-17K Germans that got interred. This is in addition to the 10's of thousands of Japanese.
Back then an oath was a serious thing ,never taken lightly.
Today an oath means nothing.
Now back to basic interment.
Do you trust an administration who can't do any thing right or Completely for that matter?
Nov 19, 2015 07:17:40 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
bvm wrote:
You mean like the Germans and Italians who winded up there, because they would not take an oath of allegiance to the US. I think there were about 5-7K Italians and 11-17K Germans that got interred. This is in addition to the 10's of thousands of Japanese.
Back then an oath was a serious thing ,never taken lightly.
Today an oath means nothing.
Now back to basic interment.
Do you trust an administration who can't do any thing right or Completely for that matter?
Back then an oath was a serious thing ,never taken lightly.
Today an oath means nothing.
Now back to basic interment.
Do you trust an administration who can't do any thing right or Completely for that matter?
=========================================
NO, I am saying that the individual states do it on their own... Highly doubt that "o" would think of doing it. No doubt it would totally piss him off , but who gives a s**t... That way, they could not mingle with the public nor receive vistors and be kept under total survailence...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.