I got inspired by Billy's comment on another thread - "Getting people to contribute images will be a slow process as the bar was possibly set too high standards wise from day one. Normal images were almost discouraged by the headlong rush to be artistic." People are doing so many creative things with images, and I thought here I am just plodding along shooting my wildflowers.
I will describe what I have been trying to do this year. I am basically doing "record" shots of native plant species in bloom, so I want a good representation of the plant, but I have been experimenting with lighting and composition trying to not just record the plant but to pursue the vision I have of it in my mind. Jenny was talking about still life on a thread here, and from that I have been looking for settings that already are still lifes, so to speak. With the lighting, I want it to highlight the main subject, to separate it from the background, but get the light to fall off gradually onto adjacent leaves, and also get the focus to fade nicely into the background.
This one is the native Rose-ringed Blanketflower.
Mike
Well, I think you failed miserably. What you have presented here is a work of art, whatever your intentions. Not because of any special effects or manipulation of software, but by the sheer artistry of your vision. Please keep it up Mike. I'd love to see more of these .......
Someone once told me that if a painting looked too realistic (as if it were a photograph), then the artist wasn't a true painter. Are you kidding me!? To me it would indicate a painter of the highest caliber. Your photo would not be confused for a painting ..... but it serves as the inspiration for someone to see life as clearly as you do.
Bob Yankle wrote:
Well, I think you failed miserably. What you have presented here is a work of art, whatever your intentions. Not because of any special effects or manipulation of software, but by the sheer artistry of your vision. Please keep it up. I'd love to see more of these .......
Thanks, Bob. Much appreciated. Your work with plant images has been a source of inspiration for me.
Mike
Frank2013
Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
Blenheim Orange wrote:
With the lighting, I want it to highlight the main subject, to separate it from the background, but get the light to fall off gradually onto adjacent leaves, and also get the focus to fade nicely into the background.
This one is the native Rose-ringed Blanketflower.
Mike
Mike you have done this with abilities I aspire to acquire. I question why you leave the backside leaf on the left to distract form the goal you are after?
Blenheim Orange wrote:
....People are doing so many creative things with images, and I thought here I am just plodding along shooting my wildflowers.
I will describe what I have been trying to do this year. I am basically doing "record" shots of native plant species in bloom, so I want a good representation of the plant, but I have been experimenting with lighting and composition trying to not just record the plant but to pursue the vision I have of it in my mind. Jenny was talking about still life on a thread here, and from that I have been looking for settings that already are still lifes, so to speak. With the lighting, I want it to highlight the main subject, to separate it from the background, but get the light to fall off gradually onto adjacent leaves, and also get the focus to fade nicely into the background.
This one is the native Rose-ringed Blanketflower.
Mike
....People are doing so many creative things with ... (
show quote)
Wonderful clarity and colors, especially in the (Download).
As a side, I clicked to zoom-in and love it cropped in twice as much.
Thank you for sharing and getting the game going! S-
Frank2013 wrote:
Mike you have done this with abilities I aspire to acquire. I question why you leave the backside leaf on the left to distract form the goal you are after?
Thank you Frank. Do you find that one leaf distracting? Not sure myself.
Mike
Frank2013
Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Thank you Frank. Do you find that one leaf distracting? Not sure myself.
Mike
Yes but that's just me you know. To me it stands out like a sore thumb.
Beautifully executed, Mike!
You aint plodding at all Mike. This is a wonderfully executed image that needs to be nothing other than than that. Its a wall hanger because you did a magnificent job of capturing the glory of a beautiful flower.
Im as guilty as most but hope this encourages more people to post images without the need to think they need to be strangled by Photoshop to be accepted.
St3v3M wrote:
Wonderful clarity and colors, especially in the (Download).
As a side, I clicked to zoom-in and love it cropped in twice as much.
Thank you for sharing and getting the game going! S-
Thanks. Let's try that...
Mike
Blenheim Orange wrote:
I got inspired by Billy's comment on another thread - "Getting people to contribute images will be a slow process as the bar was possibly set too high standards wise from day one. Normal images were almost discouraged by the headlong rush to be artistic." People are doing so many creative things with images, and I thought here I am just plodding along shooting my wildflowers.
I will describe what I have been trying to do this year. I am basically doing "record" shots of native plant species in bloom, so I want a good representation of the plant, but I have been experimenting with lighting and composition trying to not just record the plant but to pursue the vision I have of it in my mind. Jenny was talking about still life on a thread here, and from that I have been looking for settings that already are still lifes, so to speak. With the lighting, I want it to highlight the main subject, to separate it from the background, but get the light to fall off gradually onto adjacent leaves, and also get the focus to fade nicely into the background.
This one is the native Rose-ringed Blanketflower.
Mike
I got inspired by Billy's comment on another threa... (
show quote)
That is mighty pretty, Mike. The composition with the full-bloom flower just above the little bud makes such a nice double circle design. . I am not in your league with flowers, but I find that they don't usually require much PP except for fixing a little intrusion here or there on toning down colors that my sensor got carried away with. They kind of come with their own PP included! The extra leaf could go or stay in my book, but I do think I like the one with it gone the best.
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Absolutely.
Mike
Thank you and something like this. S-
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.