Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Definition of "Long Lens"
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Nov 9, 2015 02:29:45   #
jfn007 Loc: Close to the middle of nowhere.
 
Does anyone know at what length in mm a lens is considered a "long lens?"

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 02:39:47   #
raysass Loc: Brooklin, On, Canada.
 
jfn007 wrote:
Does anyone know at what length in mm a lens is considered a "long lens?"


Just guessing I'd say anything over 200mm.

Ray.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 02:40:51   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
jfn007 wrote:
Does anyone know at what length in mm a lens is considered a "long lens?"

i would vote for 400mm and up as long.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 04:29:56   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
I would consider 500mm to be a long lens.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 04:36:27   #
jeryh Loc: Oxfordshire UK
 
approximately from 135mm upwards;

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 06:40:59   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Longer mm's than a short one.....

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 07:18:26   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
jfn007 wrote:
Does anyone know at what length in mm a lens is considered a "long lens?"


The specific mm would vary depending on the camera format used.
Wikipedia says it's a lens that's longer than the diagonal measurement of the film or sensor for a particular format.

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 07:22:10   #
moonhawk Loc: Land of Enchantment
 
Longer than the diagonal of the image circle.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 07:53:22   #
DirtFarmer Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
 
I'd say a factor of two in focal length.

On a FF camera (or an old 35mm camera) my definition would be longer than 100mm. 50mm is generally considered "normal" for that frame so twice that would be long. On my old speed graphic, the normal lens was something like 150mm. It really wasn't set up to take longer lenses easily (or shorter, for that matter).

If anything below 25mm on a FF camera is considered an "ultrawide" lens, then anything above 200mm should be considered an "ultralong" lens.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 09:34:12   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
The designations used to be wide, standard and telephoto. With Nikon, at least in film days, wide started at 35mm, tele at 85mm. There was also what they called Special Purpose, that included Zoom, Fisheye, Perspective Control, Guide Number, etc.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 10:54:11   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
jfn007 wrote:
Does anyone know at what length in mm a lens is considered a "long lens?"


I always thought that size doesn't count. I know that's what every one is thinking- I finally said it---LOL

Reply
 
 
Nov 9, 2015 11:04:07   #
Darkroom317 Loc: Mishawaka, IN
 
quixdraw wrote:
The designations used to be wide, standard and telephoto. With Nikon, at least in film days, wide started at 35mm, tele at 85mm. There was also what they called Special Purpose, that included Zoom, Fisheye, Perspective Control, Guide Number, etc.


Telephoto does not have to do with lens length, it has to do with design. Yes, all telephoto lenses are long lenses but not all long lenses are telephotos. The reason for telephoto lens is compactness by needing less distance between the lens are the image plane than with a standard formula long lens. For instance the distance from image plane to the middle of a lens for a 300mm lens is 300mm but for a 300mm telephoto lens it would be far less than 300mm.

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:12:08   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
I didn't even know, "long lens", was a category!!
Shows you how little I know!! :lol:
SS

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:30:29   #
Quixdraw Loc: x
 
SharpShooter wrote:
I didn't even know, "long lens", was a category!!
Shows you how little I know!! :lol:
SS


Point I was making -- straight from the old Nikon manual. Long lens is a pop phrase -- doesn't even appear in the Online Etymology Dictionary, so no hint of origin, not that it matters! :wink:

Reply
Nov 9, 2015 11:31:22   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
DirtFarmer wrote:
I'd say a factor of two in focal length.
On a FF camera (or an old 35mm camera) my definition would be longer than 100mm. ...
If anything below 25mm on a FF camera is considered an "ultrawide" lens, then anything above 200mm should be considered an "ultralong" lens.

That sort of leaves the 1200mm, 1700mm, and 2000mm lenses out there as orphans.
http://skimaps1982.blogspot.com/2014/04/nikon-nikkor-2000-mm-f11.html

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.