Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Lens for newborn photos
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Nov 6, 2015 07:05:39   #
legion3 Loc: Deer Park Long Island
 
What would the best lens for newborn photography

Reply
Nov 6, 2015 07:09:23   #
Jcmarino
 
I use my 50mm prime 1.8 because I like to use as much natural light as possible and be physically close to the baby.

Reply
Nov 6, 2015 07:09:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
legion3 wrote:
What would the best lens for newborn photography

A fast (f/2.8, f/1.8) lens will eliminate the need for a flash. Aside from that, I doubt that it really matters. Here is a good article, with thousands more available.

http://www.clickinmoms.com/blog/10-tips-for-photographing-your-own-newborn-by-lisa-holloway/

http://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=newborn+photography+tips

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2015 07:24:55   #
Rongnongno Loc: FL
 
I would more worry about the lighting than the lens...

Just saying.

Reply
Nov 6, 2015 07:37:22   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
For what body?

+1 on Rongnongno's comment.

Reply
Nov 6, 2015 08:16:28   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I would more worry about the lighting than the lens...

Just saying.


:thumbup:

Reply
Nov 6, 2015 08:33:48   #
legion3 Loc: Deer Park Long Island
 
5D mark III
RichardTaylor wrote:
For what body?

+1 on Rongnongno's comment.

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2015 08:41:20   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
legion3 wrote:
5D mark III


50mm 1.8 or 1.4

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 01:33:54   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I would more worry about the lighting than the lens...

Just saying.

Good call. That reinforces the other comments about the fact that the focal length of the lens (within reason) is not as important as the speed of the lens. I have never seen a picture (candid snapshot or formal portrait) which was improved by artificial light. Natural lighting is best for infants. They look more natural, and they are not disturbed by a sudden blast of light.

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 05:20:24   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
I also vote for 50mm f1.4 or f1.8. I have a book by a infant photographer and almost everyone was done with a 50mm.

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 06:14:44   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
Tracy B. wrote:
I also vote for 50mm f1.4 or f1.8. I have a book by a infant photographer and almost everyone was done with a 50mm.


That person is just starting photography! LoL

*No offense meant but I thought it was funny when you said "infant photographer".

Reply
 
 
Nov 7, 2015 06:44:14   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
GENorkus wrote:
That person is just starting photography! LoL

*No offense meant but I thought it was funny when you said "infant photographer".


I was thinking about a wide angle for an infant whale....

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 06:53:53   #
Tracy B. Loc: Indiana
 
GENorkus wrote:
That person is just starting photography! LoL

*No offense meant but I thought it was funny when you said "infant photographer".


:lol:
That is funny!

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 06:58:15   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Got the makings of another great day! :lol: :thumbup:

Reply
Nov 7, 2015 06:58:37   #
PalePictures Loc: Traveling
 
DaveO wrote:
I was thinking about a wide angle for an infant whale....


There is no one here that knows more about infant photography than Cliff Lawson. He goes by CaptainC and helps run a charity for photographing infants near death. He also knows many many photographer who do this type of photography. If I were gong to do this type of photography that's who I would ask....and probably a ton more questions. You might want to PM him and have him respond here.

Best regards
Russ Elkins

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.