VIDEO Ted Cruz Smacks Down Biased Moderators, Social Media Erupts (Page 2): I have given my view many times, and here it is again: I do not know, science does not know, you do not...

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
That is not the response to the question, which you raised earlier:
Now, once again your wisdom: How and where did life begin?

Checkmate wrote:

Why don't you tell us?

I have given my view many times, and here it is again:

I do not know, science does not know, you do not know, the church does not know, the Clown does not know, LarJ does not know, Bangee does not know, and the Bible does not know.

Now Checkmate, am I wrong or do you know? Enlighten us with your wisdom.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Anyways back to the original post, please ignore James and his obsession with me and religion that has nothing to do with religion. Yup the extreme left and their bias gotcha questions, Liberals are "sk**led" at causing division among people just as Obama has been d******e.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/28/ted-cruz-smacks-down-biased-moderators-social-media-eru...

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

Anyways back to the original post, please ignore James and his obsession with me and religion that has nothing to do with religion. Yup the extreme left and their bias gotcha questions, Liberals are "sk**led" at causing division among people just as Obama has been d******e.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/28/ted-cruz-smacks-down-biased-moderators-social-media-eru...

Why do you NOT answer questions addressed to you, but instead jump to a new post to avoiding doing so?

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

James Shaw wrote:

Why do you NOT answer questions addressed to you, but instead jump to a new post to avoiding doing so?

Could be you're not worthy of a reply.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

NeilL wrote:

Could be you're not worthy of a reply.

The dude stalks all my attic posts and continues to address me with insults and degradation then precedes to accuse me of doing what he has been guilty of lol.....very odd and bizarre. Now watch how he responds to me.

James Shaw

Racmanaz wrote:

The dude stalks all my attic posts and continues to address me with insults and degradation then precedes to accuse me of doing what he has been guilty of lol.....very odd and bizarre. Now watch how he responds to me.

Why do you NOT answer questions addressed to you? What are you afraid of? I have answered questions addressed to me from you, but you do not answer when the same question is asked of you.

Why?

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
Why do you NOT answer questions addressed to you, but instead jump to a new post to avoiding doing so?

NeilL wrote:

Could be you're not worthy of a reply.

Perhaps, but then, if that is so, why do I continue to get replies, but not to questions that I have asked. Why? Something wrong here.

Why would one continue to create new posts to avoid answering simple questions asked him on a previous post? Something wrong here.

I have been ridiculed (not that I care), when I answer that I do not know how and where life began on earth or anywhere. But when the same question is asked in return, I get silence. Why is that?

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

James Shaw wrote:

I have given my view many times, and here it is again:

I do not know, science does not know, you do not know, the church does not know, the Clown does not know, LarJ does not know, Bangee does not know, and the Bible does not know.

Now Checkmate, am I wrong or do you know? Enlighten us with your wisdom.

Sorry to but in, but if you and everybody else does not know where life started, then how can you be so sure that Racmanaz is wrong about it starting through divine intervention?

James Shaw

Quote:

James Shaw wrote:
I have given my view many times, and here it is again:

I do not know, science does not know, you do not know, the church does not know, the Clown does not know, LarJ does not know, Bangee does not know, and the Bible does not know.

Now Checkmate, am I wrong or do you know? Enlighten us with your wisdom.

Steven Seward wrote:

Sorry to but in, but if you and everybody else does not know where life started, then how can you be so sure that Racmanaz is wrong about it starting through divine intervention?

Are you not putting the cart before the horse? Firstly, Clown has not answered. Secondly, aren't you answering for the Clown? Surly Clown is capable of answering for himself?

Divine intervention is not a rational answer. It's belief, and belief is not based on reason/evidence. That is why it is called belief.

When I say neither you, I, Clown, Church, Discovery Institute, Bible, or anyone knows where and how life originated on earth, my answer is a reasonable answer, not one based on superstition i.e, which it is not evidence based.

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

James Shaw wrote:

Are you not putting the cart before the horse? Fi... (show quote)

I am answering only for myself. Excuse me, I just felt like jumping in. If divine intervention is a belief based not on evidence or rationality, isn't your belief AGAINST it also founded on no evidence or rationality? If not, then give me the evidence you have and explain it rationally.

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

Steven Seward wrote:

I am answering only for myself. Excuse me, I just felt like jumping in. If divine intervention is a belief based not on evidence or rationality, isn't your belief AGAINST it also founded on no evidence or rationality? If not, then give me the evidence you have and explain it rationally.

I think there is some logic issue here...

his belief AGAINST it is founded on the fact that there is no evidence or rationality?

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

green wrote:

I think there is some logic issue here...

his belief AGAINST it is founded on the fact that there is no evidence or rationality?

Yes, but how can you believe in things not seen? A belief against something is just as rational or irrational as a belief in something. All rationality is based on evidence, not lack of evidence. If mankind believed for millennia that there was nothing smaller than a grain of sand just because he could not see anything smaller, he would have been thinking irrationally. We now know that there are microbes and atoms and protons and neutrons and morons(!) How do we know that there is not something even smaller? We don't.

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

Steven Seward wrote:

Yes, but how can you believe in things not seen? ... (show quote)

actually we do...quarks, but logically there is no way to prove something doesn't exist unless you have access to the entire universe past present and future.

Using your logic, a belief in flying pigs with propeller ears and aileron tails is as rational as a belief that flying pigs do not exist... the burden of proof falls on the pig flyer.

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

green wrote:

actually we do...quarks, but logically there is no way to prove something doesn't exist unless you have access to the entire universe past present and future.

Brilliant! I forgot about quarks.

green wrote:

Using your logic, a belief in flying pigs with propeller ears and aileron tails is as rational as a belief that flying pigs do not exist... the burden of proof falls on the pig flyer.

As a matter of fact, I do believe in flying pigs, ever since Bruce Springstein was elected into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame! Not sure about those aileron tails though. That is just crazy talk!

green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20

Steven Seward wrote:

As a matter of fact, I do believe in flying pigs, ever since Bruce Springstein was elected into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame! Not sure about those aileron tails though. That is just crazy talk!

http://i.ebayimg.com/00/s/NTAwWDUwMA==/z/djoAAOSwq7JUCfst/$_35.JPG