Keenan wrote:
No, little one, you are projecting, again. Unlike you right wing nuts who cannot discuss a single subject without politicizing it and using it as an excuse to bash Obama or current liberal politicians, no matter how unrelated to the subject being discussed, I am interested in this important aspect of US history that is not well known about but is important and significant for Americans to know about.
It's just that the villains in this historical subject are your heroes, so of course you will have to deny, attack, deflect, and insult anybody who talks about it. You are so boring and predictable.
No, little one, you are projecting, again. Unlike ... (
show quote)
Where in this thread did I mention any contemporary liberal? Sorry little Keenan, you lose, I think it is just as noteworthy that Margaret Sanger, a woman that the left holds in the highest esteem, just ask Hillary, believed in eugenics and the extermination of the "weeds" in our society. To pull this full circle little one, why do you bring this subject up? Because, you state, the villains are my heroes, obviously I and most people today know very little of Prescott Bush so you are really talking about the contemporary Bushes and the republican party that supports them.... Jeb I would say has less to defend than does our Hillary, I am simply contrasting your strawman argument with something as equally d********g and even more concerning as she is still hailed by the leading democrat candidate as one of the most important women in our country's history and one that she draws inspiration from.