The Endorsement Primary
Oct 28, 2015 08:32:55 #
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."
Oct 28, 2015 08:37:13 #
that's certainly been true in the past... will this be the outsider's race?
Oct 28, 2015 09:52:32 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
[quote=nakkh]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock !
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock !
Oct 28, 2015 09:52:32 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
[quote=nakkh]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock !
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock !
Oct 28, 2015 14:15:39 #
nakkh wrote:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."
Great satire.
Oct 28, 2015 19:55:31 #
yhtomit wrote:
pretty good results... but they missed Obama!Great satire.
Oct 28, 2015 20:25:38 #
green wrote:
pretty good results... but they missed Obama!
It's satirical commentary at best. Jeeze can't you see that the list is incomplete. They left the obama off because of his resume. They thought it was a bad joke that his only hourly job was being an ice cream scooper.
But you know what,it's true.
I read that in my daughters book "Amazing Facts",they had a section on presidents.
Oct 28, 2015 20:41:53 #
yhtomit wrote:
They thought it was a bad joke that his only hourly job was being an ice cream scooper.
But you know what,it's true.
I read that in my daughters book "Amazing Facts",they had a section on presidents.
But you know what,it's true.
I read that in my daughters book "Amazing Facts",they had a section on presidents.
Am I to understand that it is your belief that only jobs that pay hourly are real jobs, and all the jobs that pay salary, which in general are the higher paid jobs, are f**e or don't count?
Oct 28, 2015 22:21:28 #
Sorry but Nate Silver has solid creds. No bulls**t here.
[quote=donrent][quote=nakkh]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock ![/quote]
[quote=donrent][quote=nakkh]http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-endorsement-primary/
"In p**********l primaries, endorsements have been among the best
predictors of which candidates will succeed and which will fail. So were
keeping track."[/quote
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
What a crock ![/quote]
Oct 29, 2015 00:58:27 #
Keenan wrote:
Am I to understand that it is your belief that only jobs that pay hourly are real jobs, and all the jobs that pay salary, which in general are the higher paid jobs, are f**e or don't count?
no
Oct 29, 2015 01:07:50 #
yhtomit wrote:
no
Oh. Ok. Then you criticize Obama because his only hourly job was serving ice cream, then I'm afraid I'm not understanding your point. Or were you just attempting to make a cheap shot that doesn't really have any substance (more likely)?
Oct 29, 2015 10:33:08 #
Keenan wrote:
Oh. Ok. Then you criticize Obama because his only hourly job was serving ice cream, then I'm afraid I'm not understanding your point. Or were you just attempting to make a cheap shot that doesn't really have any substance (more likely)?
I merely pointed out the the only private sector job ever held by the obama,was operating an ice cream scooping devise. His failure in Chicago speaks for it's self. Your attempt at a cheap shot failed miserably just as it has in the past.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.