Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Racmanaz wrote:
You call Republicans r****ts then you say " r****t Republican base will actually choose this African American nut case as their nominee when it gets down to the wire." <<< right here you just proved that it is YOU that is a r****ts.
Really? How is that? Can you please show me specifically what I said that was r****t? You really don't know the definition of 'r****t', do you? Here, you might want to look it up in the dictionary again. I'll help you. Ready? Here we go:
Merriam Webster Dictionary wrote:
r****m
noun racĀ·ism \ˈrā-ˌsi-zəm also -ˌshi-\
poor treatment of or violence against people because of their race; the belief that some races of people are better than others
Full Definition of R****M
1: a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
2: racial prejudice or discrimination
Now that we have reviewed the definition of r****m, can you explain to me what I said above that makes me a r****t?
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Saul Linsky? What does Sault Linsky have to do with Ben Carson? You do realize that Saul Linsky is not running for president this year, right Rac?
Keenan wrote:
Now that we have reviewed the definition of r****m, can you explain to me what I said above that makes me a r****t?
Racmanaz wrote:
You call Republicans r****ts then you say " r****t Republican base will actually choose
this African American nut case as their nominee when it gets down to the wire." <<< right here you just proved that it is YOU that is a r****ts. <<< this is your r****t statement.
Keenan wrote:
Saul Linsky? What does Sault Linsky have to do with Ben Carson? You do realize that Saul Linsky is not running for president this year, right Rac?
Saul Linsky incarnate has been in the White House for the past 7 years.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Racmanaz wrote:
Racmanaz wrote:
You call Republicans r****ts then you say " r****t Republican base will actually choose this African American nut case as their nominee when it gets down to the wire." <<< right here you just proved that it is YOU that is a r****ts. <<< this is your r****t statement.
But you still didn't explain to me how what I said was r****t, you merely copied and pasted your previous post here which doesn't show anything I said that was r****t. You're a little slow, aren't you? Do we need to go over the definition of r****m together, Rac?
"this African American nut case"Is this phrase I used what you are claiming is r****t? Please explain.
Keenan wrote:
Today is Tuesday. That means that it is N**i and Holocaust comparisons day for Ben Carson. Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays are for S***ery comparisons.
There is not a chance in hell that the r****t Republican base will actually choose this African American nut case as their nominee when it gets down to the wire. The polls that reflect Carson's lead at this point are merely protest v**es against the establishment, and an attempt to try to prove that they are not r****ts. His lead at this point means about as much as it did when Michelle Bachmann was in the lead 8 years ago at this point, or when Palin was in the lead at this point 4 years ago.
Hint: diddly squat
Today is Tuesday. That means that it is N**i and H... (
show quote)
You Liberals keep up the race card, people are waking up to your detectives lies about Rep being r****t. Neither the Democrat party nor the republican party are r****ts, they are however maybe a small count of r****ts in BOTH parties. People are just s**k of your Liberals lies about Reps being r****t, woman's right h**ers, h**ers of the poor. All that is just a bunch of nonsense h**eful lying labels that are not true.
Keenan wrote:
But you still didn't explain to me how what I said was r****t, you merely copied and pasted your previous post here which doesn't show anything I said that was r****t. You're a little slow, aren't you? Do we need to go over the definition of r****m together, Rac?
"this African American nut case"
Is this phrase I used what you are claiming is r****t? Please explain.
You are a r****t by your statement about ben Carson...you are a r****t bigot.
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Racmanaz wrote:
You are a r****t by your statement about ben Carson...you are a r****ts bigot.
But you still won't answer my question. I know that you would prefer that we just take your word for it that my statement was r****t, but I have asked you 3 times now to explain
why or how it is r****t. If you are so sure that it is r****t, then you should be able to explain why very easily. But you refuse to. Why do you refuse?
Again, should we go over the definition
together?
And please don't just answer by, again, merely repeating your baseless assertion you already repeated 3 times that "your statement is r****t". I want to see if you really understand what the definition of r****m is, or if you really sincerely believe that my statement was r****t or you are just race baiting me.
Keenan wrote:
But you still won't answer my question. I know that you would prefer that we just take your word for it that my statement was r****t, but I have asked you 3 times now to explain why or how it is r****t. If you are so sure that it is r****t, then you should be able to explain why very easily. But you refuse to. Why do you refuse?
Again, should we go over the definition together?
Tell me, how does that definition fall within your idea that Republicans are r****ts? Because they may strongly disagree with Obama and his policies? See you may dislike Ben Carson but that does not mean you nor I are r****ts does it? I was just trying to make a point, I don't really think you are r****t just because of your statement about Ben Carson. I am just getting tired of Liberals lying to the people about Reps being r****ts, against women's rights and not concerned with the poor...those are all lies constantly told about Reps from Liberals. Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?
Keenan
Loc: Central Coast California
Racmanaz wrote:
Tell me, how does that definition fall within your idea that Republicans are r****ts? Because they may strongly disagree with Obama and his policies? See you may dislike Ben Carson but that does not mean you nor I are r****ts does it? I was just trying to make a point, I don't really think you are r****t just because of your statement about Ben Carson. I am just getting tired of Liberals lying to the people about Reps being r****ts, against women's rights and not concerned with the poor...those are all lies constantly told about Reps from Liberals. Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?
Tell me, how does that definition fall within your... (
show quote)
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to answer my question, but you then go on to change the question, and then proceed to answer the wrong question.
So, I guess in a round-a-bout way that you are admitting that you just made up that assertion and you don't have any legitimate reason to claim that statement was r****t. Ok, thanks for sort of admitting that.
You said: "Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?"
Oh, is that the point that you were really getting at? You just want everybody to drop the whole issue of r****m?
Um, no. When there is injustice going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed, I will not keep quiet about that. And when that injustice that is going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed involves
r****m and when I see people acting
r****t, then no, I will not abide. I will continue to campaign against r****m in this country, and I will continue to call out r****ts when I see them. So, the answer is "no". Sorry.
Keenan wrote:
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to answer my question, but you then go on to change the question, and then proceed to answer the wrong question.
So, I guess in a round-a-bout way that you are admitting that you just made up that assertion and you don't have any legitimate reason to claim that statement was r****t. Ok, thanks for sort of admitting that.
You said: "Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?"
Oh, is that the point that you were really getting at? You just want everybody to drop the whole issue of r****m?
Um, no. When there is injustice going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed, I will not keep quiet about that. And when that injustice that is going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed involves r****m and when I see people acting r****t, then no, I will not abide. I will continue to campaign against r****m in this country, and I will continue to call out r****ts when I see them. So, the answer is "no". Sorry.
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to ans... (
show quote)
Of course there is r****m in all ethnic groups whether white,black, Asian, Mexican ect. This is not about the general public, this is about calling a political party a r****ts when they are not especially for political expediency. You Liberals on the left take advantage of the lies told from your side about the Right. If you really want to talk who is the most r****t, then fine I will have that conversation with you but reluctantly. We could take about who created the KKK and Jim Crow laws and others. But I rather not, it was in the past and they people today are not the same as was in those dark days.
Keenan wrote:
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to answer my question, but you then go on to change the question, and then proceed to answer the wrong question.
So, I guess in a round-a-bout way that you are admitting that you just made up that assertion and you don't have any legitimate reason to claim that statement was r****t. Ok, thanks for sort of admitting that.
You said: "Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?"
Oh, is that the point that you were really getting at? You just want everybody to drop the whole issue of r****m?
Um, no. When there is injustice going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed, I will not keep quiet about that. And when that injustice that is going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed involves r****m and when I see people acting r****t, then no, I will not abide. I will continue to campaign against r****m in this country, and I will continue to call out r****ts when I see them. So, the answer is "no". Sorry.
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to ans... (
show quote)
Here's something for you next time Liberals like you accuse Conservatives as r****ts.....you wanted this fight now you got it. I Posted this once before in response to Liberals calling Rep/Conservatives r****t. Sorry you have no campaign against r****m, I don't by the for a second, it's a politics for you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBAEJlR4pk Who Are the R****ts: Conservatives or Liberals?
Keenan wrote:
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to answer my question, but you then go on to change the question, and then proceed to answer the wrong question.
So, I guess in a round-a-bout way that you are admitting that you just made up that assertion and you don't have any legitimate reason to claim that statement was r****t. Ok, thanks for sort of admitting that.
You said: "Now can we all stop the crap about R****m and the other lies to drive a wedge between the American public and any Political parties?"
Oh, is that the point that you were really getting at? You just want everybody to drop the whole issue of r****m?
Um, no. When there is injustice going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed, I will not keep quiet about that. And when that injustice that is going on that continues to victimize people that needs to be changed involves r****m and when I see people acting r****t, then no, I will not abide. I will continue to campaign against r****m in this country, and I will continue to call out r****ts when I see them. So, the answer is "no". Sorry.
Interesting. Now, not only are you refusing to ans... (
show quote)
Want to stop r****m, STOP talking being over obsessed about it.
Morgan Freeman on Black History Month
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GeixtYS-P3s
Racmanaz wrote:
You call Republicans r****ts then you say " r****t Republican base will actually choose this African American nut case as their nominee when it gets down to the wire." <<< right here you just proved that it is YOU that is a r****ts.
"African American nut case" is r****t now? Nice try but FAIL! What should he call him Black, Negro, Colored? Dr. Ben Carson is an African American (their preferred choice of description) and he is a nut case.
R****t are people that think only their own specific race matters (caucasians) and let you know in no uncertain terms! Don't watch their lips, watch their actions! See extremist Right Wing Conservatives (aka wingnuts) for the definition of r****m in the US. They wrote the book on it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.