Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Minolta Lenses
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 16, 2015 16:07:36   #
mffox Loc: Avon, CT
 
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.

Reply
Oct 16, 2015 16:09:58   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
mffox wrote:
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.


How would you control the aperture, since there is no separate dial for it?

Reply
Oct 16, 2015 16:24:56   #
mffox Loc: Avon, CT
 
A very good point!! Thanks.

Reply
 
 
Oct 16, 2015 16:46:40   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
mffox wrote:
A very good point!! Thanks.


I usually have one a day...I can go home now ;-)

Reply
Oct 16, 2015 17:50:26   #
mffox Loc: Avon, CT
 
Go home satisfied; you saved me a ton of trouble, for which I'm grateful.

Reply
Oct 16, 2015 21:18:28   #
Mumbler Loc: Dublin, Ohio
 
Mumbler here,
Have had experience with Minolta lenses on a Nikon d50 and that's it. No matter what I did the pictures were soft and I couldn't produce a sharp image to please me.

Sorry.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 05:58:45   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
I have the lens you named, I use it on a sony a-850. last year I used it at an air show and got fantastic fly-by shots.

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2015 06:37:02   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
mffox wrote:
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.


OK, now that you know you won't be buying it.

I have the Minolta 100-300 4.5-5.6 new style and the Minolta 75-300 4.5-5.6. The 100-300 is half the weight of the 75-300 (which ought to be named the TANK). The 100-300 surprised me with it's sharpness. It's light weight makes it an ideal walk around lens for distance shooting. On my Sony a77II it becomes a 150-450 mm zoom. I should have taken this lens to Alaska, being that it travels sooooooooooooo light. As far as a comparison between these lenses, I never have, but both are sharp and can be had very reasonable from e bay and other used places.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 07:37:00   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
mffox wrote:
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.
I have one. I also use it on my Sony a580. the auto focus works just fine and the I.Q. is superb. It is heavy though. I paid $20.00 for mine at a pawn shop. The local camera store has one for sale at $400.00. Still worth it. Be careful. The silver/grey ones are stack lenses. The black ones are the top of the line. Very durable.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 08:20:54   #
picturesofdogs Loc: Dallas, Texas.
 
mffox wrote:
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.


Check out metabones and fotodiox adapters. One of them should have one that will work for you.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 08:27:03   #
Peekayoh Loc: UK
 
Mumbler wrote:
Mumbler here,
Have had experience with Minolta lenses on a Nikon d50 and that's it. No matter what I did the pictures were soft and I couldn't produce a sharp image to please me. Sorry.
Yeah, that's the problem with Nikons. Get yourself a Sony. ROFL :lol: :lol:

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2015 08:31:39   #
Peekayoh Loc: UK
 
mffox wrote:
I hear many favorable comments about Minolta lenses. Has anyone had experience with the Minolta AF 100-300, f4.5-5.6? I would be using it on an Olympus OMD 10. Comments would be appreciated.
There were four versions of that lens; if it's the "APO" or better still the "D APO", it would be well worth buying. An outstanding lens.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 10:52:05   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
How would you control the aperture, since there is no separate dial for it?


Some adapters have the ability to control the aperture - but they only index in numbers like 1,2,3,ect so you never REALY know exactly what aperture you are using - but you CAN control it.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 12:05:22   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
imagemeister wrote:
Some adapters have the ability to control the aperture - but they only index in numbers like 1,2,3,ect so you never REALY know exactly what aperture you are using - but you CAN control it.


I know, but to my knowledge Minolta adapters for m4/3 do not have that capability. I believe we have them for canon...but they are very expensive...probably more than the op's em10.

Reply
Oct 17, 2015 12:12:46   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
imagemeister wrote:
Some adapters have the ability to control the aperture - but they only index in numbers like 1,2,3,ect so you never REALY know exactly what aperture you are using - but you CAN control it.


But you can get a sense of what aperture you are using by watching the change in the shutter speed. If I want to stop down two stops, I adjust the adapter's aperture until the shutter speed is 1/4 what it was when wide open.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.