just realized that all or most wedding photographers use Canon why is that
isn't Nikon good enough or is it the selection of lens, i shoot full frame Nikon ,did i make a mistake choosing Nikon
Err... You REALLY think there is reason?
:shock: :shock: :shock:
I assume the folks in the wedding forum will be happy to this up.
Don't know where you got your "information", but it isn't correct.
john boots wrote:
just realized that all or most wedding photographers use Canon why is that
isn't Nikon good enough or is it the selection of lens, i shoot full frame Nikon ,did i make a mistake choosing Nikon
Yeah, you made a terrible mistake. Nikons are not good enough for the average wedding.
john boots wrote:
just realized that all or most wedding photographers use Canon why is that
isn't Nikon good enough or is it the selection of lens, i shoot full frame Nikon ,did i make a mistake choosing Nikon
been going to weddings on a regular basis for 50 years but don't recall ever seeing a canon camera being used.
Just an observation ,of fact I am extremely puzzuled as to the reason
john boots wrote:
Just an observation ,of fact I am extremely puzzuled as to the reason
John, it's because a lot of wedding photographers use the Canon 85mm f1.2 and the 50mm f1.2 for artistic reasons to set their photography apart and give themselves a small edge on the competition, and ONLY Canon has one! Not counting old dilapidated manual lenses that pros don't use!!
So if all you want are run-of-the-mill wedding shots, ANY camera will do!!!!
But I'm sure you get paid for your weddings just the same, so either don't sweat it, or switch!!!! LoL
SS
I have been to 6 weddings in the past 14 months and all used Canon 5D MK iii's and many used the 70-200 F2.8 IS lens. Some had version 1 and some had version 2. My wife has 10 brothers and sisters......lots of nieces and nephews.....
i kind of guessed that it was the lens selection, the photographer was using mostly primes and only once they used a zoom . My Nikon delivers great color and clarity (full frame) with primes, guess it's what they are comfortable with .
john boots wrote:
i kind of guessed that it was the lens selection, the photographer was using mostly primes and only once they used a zoom . My Nikon delivers great color and clarity (full frame) with primes, guess it's what they are comfortable with .
John, it's not a matter of comfort, it's a matter of advantage!
Advantage gets you more work and higher paying jobs. Period!! ;-)
SS
Canon has an autofocus f/1.2 lens. That's what they wanted. If they use Nikon they could get f/1.2 lenses but they won't be AF and these guys just can't manual focus.
BebuLamar wrote:
Canon has an autofocus f/1.2 lens. That's what they wanted. If they use Nikon they could get f/1.2 lenses but they won't be AF and these guys just can't manual focus.
Can't manual focus or don't have the extra time it takes to focus a manual lens?
jethro779 wrote:
Can't manual focus or don't have the extra time it takes to focus a manual lens?
Either way it's just not possible with the Nikon.
goes back to Lens ,lens and lens again Canon is known for it's large selection of lens ,and they have a lot of $$$$$$$$$ invested in equipment thankx for the insight ,
Sergei Yurin dumped his Canon gear and uses Olympus OMD-E-M5.
Not Canon, Nikon or full or even APS-C.
These are from a micro 4/3rds camera.
Examples
HEREIt's not the pans, it's the chef.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.