I'm trying to understand what you are implying, here what the report said... Durrett and Schmidt published a paper examining how long it
would take to have two coordinated mutations (one inactivating and the other activating) take place in an evolving hominin population. They found it would require in excess of 100 million years.
This is what you proposed...the time required is more in the
very few hundreds of thousand years-very practicable for evolution.
Two coordinated mutations every 300,000 years? That's still way too long for the difference between chimps and humans from what I can tell. In 6 million years with 2 coordinated mutations every 300,000 years would be a total of 20 pairs of mutations. What am I getting wrong here? Please help me understand.
Sorry, I will go with Michael Behe's findings, he was vindicated and you guys will just have to accept his work whether you believe it or not, he won this battle.
"So, Michael Behe Was Right After All; What Will the Critics Say Now" http://chab123.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/so-michael-behe-was-right-after-all-what-will-the-critics-say-now/ Michael Behe Vindicated! (Part 1 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bTYvYzm7jE Michael Behe Vindicated! (Part 2 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyK7FyNnx0w I am sorry, no offence intended...but darwinian evolution is just pure speculation and NOT based on any empirical observable scientific evidence. Now I understand that just because a theory is not observable does not mean it is not true, it just means it is not scientifically observable.
I'm trying to understand what you are implying, he... (