Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Why We Don't Look Like Chimps
Page <<first <prev 4 of 14 next> last>>
Oct 5, 2015 21:52:57   #
nakkh Loc: San Mateo, Ca
 
It's only a physics issue. We will be able to create life from scratch in 15
years or less. We may soon also find life on Mars. Mars may have had
life first, & infected Earth with life early on.

At any rate, it will be settled science long before the end of your lifetime.




Racmanaz wrote:
It is scientific that only life begets life and non life produces NO life. Science therefore supports intelligent design not mistaken undirected "design" processes.

Reply
Oct 5, 2015 22:42:16   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
nakkh wrote:
It's only a physics issue. We will be able to create life from scratch in 15
years or less. We may soon also find life on Mars. Mars may have had
life first, & infected Earth with life early on.

At any rate, it will be settled science long before the end of your lifetime.


Lol good luck until then you're wrong, by the way life is not just a physics tissue it is a spiritual issue. But let's say that we did are able to create life, guess what you just proved intelligent design creates life

Reply
Oct 5, 2015 22:49:34   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol good luck until then you're wrong, by the way life is not just a physics issue only it is a spiritual issue. But let's say that we did amd are able to create life, guess what you just proved intelligent design creates life

Reply
 
 
Oct 5, 2015 23:43:58   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol good luck until then you're wrong, by the way life is not just a physics tissue it is a spiritual issue. But let's say that we did are able to create life, guess what you just proved intelligent design creates life


Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha nik nak paddy whack you just got burned. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 02:53:11   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Racmanaz wrote:
There is no diversion from me, the diversion is coming from YOUR side
The title of the post is "Why we don't look like chimps".........."Remembering Will Provine" has no relevance to this subject...........A diversion, plain and simple..........

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 02:53:14   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Hmm lets see, man has all the components (C********es) "one X and one Y) to be either male or female. Females have c********es to be female only (two X's), therefore we can hypothesize and say female came from male because Eve did not have the Y c********e to pass on to adam. Of course this is all speculation and does not absolutely indicate one way or another, just a fun "fact" that is interesting.

"The components needed to make Eve were already in Adam’s cells, i.e. human c********es, which carry the genetic material to make the human body. All humans have 46 c********es, but sex is determined by only two of them – called X and Y. Males have one X and one Y. Females have two Xs. The other 44 c********es are called autosomes, and are the same in males and females. Therefore, to make female cells from male cells God had all the different kinds of c********es he needed. He had to take out the Y and duplicate the X, but He did not have to invent any new kind of c********e that did not already exist, but if you can invent c********es in the first place – such a small act as deletion and duplication would be relatively simple. Therefore, Adam and Eve were separate, unique creations, with Adam being fully male and Eve being fully female. God did not need to create any new material to make Eve, nor was Eve simply a clone of Adam – she was a creation of God, a different individual, but still one flesh with Adam.

Furthermore, Adam and Eve (and all males and females since then) need the combination of c********es God gave them to live a normal life and reproduce. Males need one X to live, and the Y for male reproductive functions. Females need two X’s for female reproductive functions – all of which must have been carefully predesigned by God so He could make man and woman in such an amazing way.

http://askjohnmackay.com/adams-rib-eve-made-adams-rib-clone-adam-y-c********e/
Hmm lets see, man has all the components (C*******... (show quote)


Just silly nonsense.

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 02:55:43   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
slocumeddie wrote:
The title of the post is "Why we don't look like chimps".........."Remembering Will Provine" has no relevance to this subject...........A diversion, plain and simple..........


Wrong, read why I posted it and you will see it was relevant to the vitriol comments coming from your friends. Your friends vitriol is what is the true diversion

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2015 02:55:44   #
Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!
 
slocumeddie wrote:
The title of the post is "Why we don't look like chimps".........."Remembering Will Provine" has no relevance to this subject...........A diversion, plain and simple..........


..

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 02:59:28   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
I'm trying to understand what you are implying, here what the report said... Durrett and Schmidt published a paper examining how long it would take to have two coordinated mutations (one inactivating and the other activating) take place in an evolving hominin population. They found it would require in excess of 100 million years.
This is what you proposed...the time required is more in the very few hundreds of thousand years-very practicable for evolution.

Two coordinated mutations every 300,000 years? That's still way too long for the difference between chimps and humans from what I can tell. In 6 million years with 2 coordinated mutations every 300,000 years would be a total of 20 pairs of mutations. What am I getting wrong here? Please help me understand.
Sorry, I will go with Michael Behe's findings, he was vindicated and you guys will just have to accept his work whether you believe it or not, he won this battle.

"So, Michael Behe Was Right After All; What Will the Critics Say Now"
http://chab123.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/so-michael-behe-was-right-after-all-what-will-the-critics-say-now/

Michael Behe Vindicated! (Part 1 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bTYvYzm7jE

Michael Behe Vindicated! (Part 2 of 2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyK7FyNnx0w

I am sorry, no offence intended...but darwinian evolution is just pure speculation and NOT based on any empirical observable scientific evidence. Now I understand that just because a theory is not observable does not mean it is not true, it just means it is not scientifically observable.
I'm trying to understand what you are implying, he... (show quote)


http://thewaronbulls**t.com/2008/05/08/intelligent-design-not-very-intelligent/

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 03:03:30   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
LarJgrip wrote:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha nik nak paddy whack you just got burned. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Typical, childish school yard response..........are you just the brain of a 10 year old planted in an adult's body.....???

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 03:06:27   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Wrong, read why I posted it and you will see it was relevant to the vitriol comments coming from your friends. Your friends vitriol is what is the true diversion
My "friend's" vitriol is not relevant either..........

Reply
 
 
Oct 6, 2015 06:22:01   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Lol good luck until then you're wrong, by the way life is not just a physics tissue it is a spiritual issue. But let's say that we did are able to create life, guess what you just proved intelligent design creates life


not really, you'd be assuming that humans are intelligent. that's a big stretch.

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 07:57:44   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Typical, childish school yard response..........are you just the brain of a 10 year old planted in an adult's body.....???


Hey, I thought it was funny. I think a lot has to do with the way things come across in text. …on occasion I've raised an eye brow or two on some of your responses as well, be happy Eddie.
:thumbup:

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 09:35:19   #
James Shaw
 
Racmanaz wrote:
Hmm lets see, man has all the components (C********es) "one X and one Y) to be either male or female. Females have c********es to be female only (two X's), therefore we can hypothesize and say female came from male because Eve did not have the Y c********e to pass on to adam. Of course this is all speculation and does not absolutely indicate one way or another, just a fun "fact" that is interesting.

"The components needed to make Eve were already in Adam’s cells, i.e. human c********es, which carry the genetic material to make the human body. All humans have 46 c********es, but sex is determined by only two of them – called X and Y. Males have one X and one Y. Females have two Xs. The other 44 c********es are called autosomes, and are the same in males and females. Therefore, to make female cells from male cells God had all the different kinds of c********es he needed. He had to take out the Y and duplicate the X, but He did not have to invent any new kind of c********e that did not already exist, but if you can invent c********es in the first place – such a small act as deletion and duplication would be relatively simple. Therefore, Adam and Eve were separate, unique creations, with Adam being fully male and Eve being fully female. God did not need to create any new material to make Eve, nor was Eve simply a clone of Adam – she was a creation of God, a different individual, but still one flesh with Adam.

Furthermore, Adam and Eve (and all males and females since then) need the combination of c********es God gave them to live a normal life and reproduce. Males need one X to live, and the Y for male reproductive functions. Females need two X’s for female reproductive functions – all of which must have been carefully predesigned by God so He could make man and woman in such an amazing way.

http://askjohnmackay.com/adams-rib-eve-made-adams-rib-clone-adam-y-c********e/
Hmm lets see, man has all the components (C*******... (show quote)

"Genesis tell us" it states early in the article. The rest is NOT science, either.

Just another misleading concoction by the clown who dwells in fairy-tale land. Bible-Science mixing-attempts are not vogue. Never were.

Reply
Oct 6, 2015 09:41:46   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
So, are some of you saying this could actually be a picture of TWO future presidents?
Jus askin.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.