Here's an example of using a layer mask with a gradient, and Screen blending mode without having to use HDR processing. So the image looks more natural.
In this case of this RAW file the sky was overexposed and the building and foreground were underexposed. So I created 2 copies in LR and exposed one for the sky and one for the building. Then I opened them as layers in Photoshop and used a layer mask with a gradient. You could use the Quick Selection tool, but it's difficult to get a clean selection. I believe this method looks more natural. Then I used blending mode Screen to improve the exposure.
Yes, there are other ways to do this, but if I didn't tell you, would you think the results was Shopped?
Nicely done. There's deeper color to the processed shot, and hard to tell it's been messed with, which makes it perfect!
I too have needed to use this method a few times, nicely done...
Now try another duplicated layer of your second image with Multiply blend mode at 50% opacity. Gives it some depth.
And ya did all that and left the cable in Mr Lenz!!!!
Back of the Photoshop class facing the wall please.
We (meaning me but spreading the guilt) all forget some of these "tricks" to improve our images. Thanks for the kick in the pants to activate memory.
gemlenz discusses Screen blending mode without having to use HDR processing. For those who do not have HDR give away of the day has HDR Project Pro 2 for FREE.
http://www.giveawayoftheday.com/ If they have not changed the registration/s# be sure to follow the directions realizing that it is translated from German. Just do what the software company says... not what you think the say. Activation of the program will then work.
Ok I did as you suggested and also removed the cable. I think the blended layer makes the shadows look underexposed though. If I slide the shadows slider in LR to the right it starts to look better. I remember it was a bright sunny day that day.
Billyspad wrote:
Now try another duplicated layer of your second image with Multiply blend mode at 50% opacity. Gives it some depth.
And ya did all that and left the cable in Mr Lenz!!!!
Back of the Photoshop class facing the wall please.
gemlenz wrote:
Ok I did as you suggested and also removed the cable. I think the blended layer makes the shadows look underexposed though. If I slide the shadows slider in LR to the right it starts to look better. I remember it was a bright sunny day that day.
See my man worth the effort. Monitors vary so how you get the result does not matter. But its better for sure.
No idea on LR I have it hate it with a vengeance so do everything in Photoshop.
Billyspad wrote:
See my man worth the effort. Monitors vary so how you get the result does not matter. But its better for sure.
No idea on LR I have it hate it with a vengeance so do everything in Photoshop.
I agree Billy, a simple layer mask and Gemlenz could take care of the shadows he feels were effected by the new layer.
OnDSnap wrote:
I agree Billy, a simple layer mask and Gemlenz could take care of the shadows he feels were effected by the new layer.
LR just does not cut it as photo editor other than for very simple things.
Billyspad wrote:
LR just does not cut it as photo editor other than for very simple things.
Agree, It's Okay for quick and simple editing, but then I'm so used to doing most of mine with Camera Raw,if I can't with that, then into PS for more complex editing and masking etc.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.