Guns & Cameras
Sep 24, 2015 14:27:55 #
In one of Stephen Hunter's Earl Swagger novels there was a brief passage regarding gun owner's interest in cameras implying that the characteristics we find attractive in both are similar. It has stuck in my mind for several weeks and I have concluded that I would agree that the same feel, sounds and even smells of mechanical precision that I enjoy when handling an old SLR or quality rangefinder are shared with my guns.
The story setting was mid '50's so I doubt if the same could be said of today's digital cameras but I agree with his observation from that period.
Are there other members who are shooters with cameras who can relate to this?
The story setting was mid '50's so I doubt if the same could be said of today's digital cameras but I agree with his observation from that period.
Are there other members who are shooters with cameras who can relate to this?
Sep 24, 2015 15:27:17 #
Sep 24, 2015 15:39:07 #
Sep 24, 2015 16:25:19 #
I feel about the same -- however, I don't care for plastic guns. All the good cameras I can afford, or am willing to pay for, at least, have got some plastic -- even the DF. Suppose that similarity is part of the reason I still use my old film cameras!
Sep 25, 2015 06:20:33 #
They are similar because sight alignment and steady squeeze of the trigger( or the shutter button) is required for a good shot. There is no composition or exposure involved in shooting a gun, but you have to be right on target.
Sep 25, 2015 07:02:40 #
Thruxton wrote:
In one of Stephen Hunter's Earl Swagger novels the... (show quote)
I agree 100% even with the modern cameras.
Sep 25, 2015 07:43:38 #
Sep 25, 2015 07:54:23 #
Except that a camera produces something positive whereas a gun's ultimate purpose is to destroy.
Sep 25, 2015 08:30:59 #
dinosaur39 wrote:
Except that a camera produces something positive whereas a gun's ultimate purpose is to destroy.
I agree with you, one cannot save anyone's life with a camera!
Sep 25, 2015 08:55:42 #
dinosaur39 wrote:
Except that a camera produces something positive whereas a gun's ultimate purpose is to destroy.
My guns ultimate purpose is to protect!
Sep 25, 2015 09:21:52 #
dinosaur39 wrote:
Except that a camera produces something positive whereas a gun's ultimate purpose is to destroy.
The way I look at it is slightly different. Yes I do have some of my guns for protection but the primary use is for hunting. I also use my camera for hunting among other items. When I use my camera for hunting I am practicing Hunt and Release.
Greg
Sep 25, 2015 09:24:48 #
nimbushopper wrote:
I agree with you, one cannot save anyone's life with a camera!
That may not be a totally accurate statement but I know what you mean
Sep 25, 2015 09:30:37 #
This seems better suited for the Chit-Chat section. BTW, my Walter is for self defense.
Sep 25, 2015 10:03:34 #
nimbushopper wrote:
I agree with you, one cannot save anyone's life with a camera!
Well said! :thumbup:
Andy
Sep 25, 2015 10:19:14 #
Notwithstanding the valiant efforts of police, fire and EMT, they can't be everywhere. Prudent individuals prepare to protect their loved ones in the absence of services. First aid, kit and training, fire extinguishers and plans, Flashlights, food and water and ways to stay dry and warm. In addition firearms and training are a part of that preparedness. Alternately, you can take pictures of the event for future reference while you wait for responders.
I have past experience in all of the three public services mentioned and can tell you that your personal situation may be one of several with not enough responders for all. Darwin rules.
I have past experience in all of the three public services mentioned and can tell you that your personal situation may be one of several with not enough responders for all. Darwin rules.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.