btbg wrote:
Shooting from ground level gives a different look.
Shooting with your lens wide open and only focusing on one runner can work.
Panning with the subject gives a totally different look.
Look for the cleanest backgrounds you can find to isolate the runners.
Also setting up at or near the top of hills will show stress on the runners faces.
I wish I'd noticed your query when you'd first posted it. Alas, the season is already over -- at least here in New Mexico. Probably there, too, huh?
Is it just a Flickr thing (landscape orientation, that is), or do you shoot all yours that way? I rarely shoot landscape, but occasionally crop to landscape. Just my opinion, but portrait orientation seems better suited for running sports. (However, I usually have to 'straighten' the images because I don't quite get the shots level.) With a portrait orientation, you can get a closer-in image of a runner's full body, then crop as much or as little as you want to show.
I shoot with a wide-open aperture to minimize any distractions in the background, drawing the viewer's eye to the runner as much as possible. (I almost always shoot in aperture priority.) The wider aperture also results in faster exposures that help to minimize blurring of the moving subjects.
You didn't mention what camera and lens you use. While I'm not an equipment freak, I admit there are some advantages to DSLR vs. point-&-shoot types, and optical zoom is a definite advantage (IMHO) over digital zoom. I use (an inexpensive) zoom telephoto, to get 'closer' to each runner, but not too close that I can't later straighten & crop to get a relatively pleasing composition. (Rule of thirds, running 'into' to the frame, rather than out, etc.)
I like the suggestion to be at the top (or over the crest) of a hill. Likewise, I look for curves or 'corners' in the course to show the jockeying for position/passing, and constricted areas that force runners into a very pleasing line, especially if you can use depth of field to your advantage.
Again, the suggestion to shoot from a low vantage point can create some dramatic effects, especially if your background is also appealing.
So, despite all this, there's a certain 'sameness' to all sports photography (as there is for birds in flight, which I simply can't get excited about). I've been shooting my sons' cross country teams for 14 years now. The special quality I look for is the RUNNER him/herself: I want them to each have a good, memorable action photo for their Facebook page, grandma's Christmas gift, mom & dad's mantle.
If you're going to continue shooting XC next year, and you want to do something different, you could take a look through some of my pics, find one you like, ask what I did to capture it, then try it yourself next year. (Hopefully my answer won't be, "Umm, it was an ACCIDENT!!" There
are a lot of 'so-so' pics among mine, but the kids love them nonetheless.))
http://picasaweb.google.com/kruchoski/