The new Environmentalist at the wetlands area was not pleased when she found out that this flower was a non-native and was invasive. But I brightened her day when I told her it would take her 40 years to eradicate it all. So she had her dream job for life.
I very much like image #1. What magnification? Image #2 & #3 demonstrate blocked-up highlights. Histogram of image #2 is against left side; histogram of image #3 is well left from center.
I very much like image #1. What magnification? Image #2 & #3 demonstrate blocked-up highlights. Histogram of image #2 is against left side; histogram of image #3 is well left from center.
The first is 1:1 with no crop. I agree on the blocked highlights, I will have to figure something else out, the flowers are highly reflective. I have not been able to get a decent picture out of my underexposed shots.
I agree on the blocked highlights, I will have to figure something else out, the flowers are highly reflective. I have not been able to get a decent picture out of my underexposed shots.
Are you processing JPGs or raw captures (which have a much wider dynamic range)?
I use raw. The underexposed shots were taken from a distance and didn't crop well. I could bring them to the correct exposure but the focus wan't there. I hope to go back before they fade. I don't know these flowers but I have at least 6 weeks before the first frost.
I use raw. The underexposed shots were taken from a distance and didn't crop well.
What is your illumination source? One characteristic of diffused speedlight in the field is extended contrast, allowing more detail in highlights and shadows.
I use a Neewer 850 with a 6x8 diffuser on my modified bracket from above the lens. It was set at 1/4 power which I thought would do it. I only got 2 shots at this distance so no chance to adjust the settings. I am going to have to continue to shoot macro while working on my other photographic interests or I will lose even more of the skills I had developed.