GoofyNewfie wrote:
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it reviewed on another site.
It looked interesting.
I do a lot of event photography and don't really like carrying a bag around all the time just for one lens.
Just got mine today.
This appears to do the trick really well!
Lens changes are fast without need of growing another arm.
Construction could probably be a bit better- the pin that the strap is attached to has some play and makes a bit of noise, but it works well.
The exterior is plastic but the metal mount is secured to a metal ring, so it's just a cosmetic thing.
Can't wait to use it on the job!
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it rev... (
show quote)
Great! Taking a quick look, I wasn't impressed, but watching the videos changed my opinion.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I'll be using this with the 24-70 2.8 and 70-200 2.8.
And the attaching point for the strap looks strong enough?
blackest wrote:
So like a double ended end cap,on a strap?.
I am just a photographer, not a mechanical engineer - but as far as I know, the lenses are secured to body mounts with locks, not caps.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it reviewed on another site.
It looked interesting.
I do a lot of event photography and don't really like carrying a bag around all the time just for one lens.
Just got mine today.
This appears to do the trick really well!
Lens changes are fast without need of growing another arm.
Construction could probably be a bit better- the pin that the strap is attached to has some play and makes a bit of noise, but it works well.
The exterior is plastic but the metal mount is secured to a metal ring, so it's just a cosmetic thing.
Can't wait to use it on the job!
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it rev... (
show quote)
Seems to me that you are leaving the camera body uncovered in exactly the wrong orientation. I have always been told that when the lens is off, the camera should be held with the opening facing the ground.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it reviewed on another site.
It looked interesting.
I do a lot of event photography and don't really like carrying a bag around all the time just for one lens.
Just got mine today.
This appears to do the trick really well!
Lens changes are fast without need of growing another arm.
Construction could probably be a bit better- the pin that the strap is attached to has some play and makes a bit of noise, but it works well.
The exterior is plastic but the metal mount is secured to a metal ring, so it's just a cosmetic thing.
Can't wait to use it on the job!
I think Jerry41 showed this to me and I saw it rev... (
show quote)
Looks like trouble to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHeCzgpshxkNotice how his camera sits with the mirror exposed while he is making the lens change. Bet even more disturbing is that the lens flipper, with lens mounted and hanging, leaves the other side open and facing up to collect dust, dirt, lint, etc. while you are walking around with it. Then, when you make a lens change, the lens that you attach to it will get all that debris "dumped" on it when you flip it over to hang it on your shoulder. I think this may make more problems than it solves.
BobHartung wrote:
Seems to me that you are leaving the camera body uncovered in exactly the wrong orientation.
I have always been told that when the lens is off, the camera should be held with the opening facing the ground.
True, but contrary to popular belief, the sky will not fall if you do it.
I also hand-hold for most of my HDR's and stitched panoramas.
I must be evil. ;)
GoofyNewfie wrote:
True, but contrary to popular belief, the sky will not fall if you do it.
I also hand-hold for most of my HDR's and stitched panoramas.
I must be evil. ;)
You are making a trade with this unit. Speed for spots. Going by the old "haste makes waste" adage, the time saving may not be worth the problems with spots in your photos.
Have had the Lens Flipper for years and love it. When I go out with more than my 16-300 walkabout lens it is the first thing I grab. When people see me swap a lens SO quickly, easily, and SAFELY, they ask where I got it. It often carries my Tokina 11-16 & Canon 100-400 while I have another lens on the camera. Never has a problem with it and would buy another in a heartbeat.
JMHO.
Pete
lowkick wrote:
You are making a trade with this unit. Speed for spots. Going by the old "haste makes waste" adage, the time saving may not be worth the problems with spots in your photos.
Somewhat alarmist. Even without the flipper, I don't keep the camera mount pointed down when changing lenses and no catastrophic events yet
pking5820 wrote:
Have had the Lens Flipper for years and love it. ..... Never has a problem with it and would buy another in a heartbeat.
I wonder how may of the critics have never used one.
OddJobber wrote:
I wonder how may of the critics have never used one.
Like most cases, my guess is
all of them.
It's not a bad thing to see their concerns though.
They show good reasons why
they would avoid using them.
The benefit to me outweighs all of those concerns.
None of them know the conditions where I'll be using mine or my shooting style.
Example: I have a yearly 5- day event with four 14-hour days.
It's all indoors spread through two connected hotels and connected shopping area.
All I use are my Nikon D800, 24-70, 70-200 and a flash.
I have a place to store my back-up equipment in case I need it so there is no need to carry a bag around.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.