Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
Persieds
Page 1 of 2 next>
Aug 13, 2015 07:19:06   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
Shot in town. from 3am to 5am
1 20 second shot every 40 seconds.
I managed to get 2.
I plan to go to a darker zone tonight. Funny how work gets in the way of some things.

Meteor
Meteor...
(Download)

Meteor
Meteor...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 13, 2015 08:55:04   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
In the 2nd image, it looks like you have a satellite. Satellites have constant brightness (and may look like a barber's pole the way they are spinning). Meteors tend to start out faint and end much brighter.

Reply
Aug 13, 2015 09:59:03   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
JimH123 wrote:
In the 2nd image, it looks like you have a satellite. Satellites have constant brightness (and may look like a barber's pole the way they are spinning). Meteors tend to start out faint and end much brighter.
The ones that I visually saw were very quick and very short lived. I only had one or two long drawn out meteors that I of course was not shooting at the time.
I'm hoping to get to a dark zone tonight and get some of the rag tag leftovers. It's pretty difficult to shoot in a red zone. At least we are not white anymore.
Jim

Reply
 
 
Aug 13, 2015 11:18:20   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
I got up at 3am (no thanks to my daughter's yappy Chihuahua I'm babysitting for a few days...)so I went outside to observe what should have been the optimum view of the shower. Half an hour. Nada. Zip. Whoopee.

Reply
Aug 13, 2015 11:53:51   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
skylane5sp wrote:
I got up at 3am (no thanks to my daughter's yappy Chihuahua I'm babysitting for a few days...)so I went outside to observe what should have been the optimum view of the shower. Half an hour. Nada. Zip. Whoopee.
It ran in little spurts here. Again, red zone is not optimal viewing but I did see close to 12 in about a 20 minute window, then I didn't see anything for a bit. I never saw a great deal here.
Sorry you didn't see anything at all.

Reply
Aug 14, 2015 13:29:26   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Nice shots Jim.
Craig From cloudy So Calif.

Reply
Aug 14, 2015 14:52:50   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
CraigFair wrote:
Nice shots Jim.
Craig From cloudy So Calif.
Last night was mostly clear but I shot until 1:30 and did not see a single meteor.
Sorry about the clouds. My high pressure shifted your way instead of Texas. I was just too tired to go anywhere

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2015 11:02:37   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
I was having trouble with my settings, so I asked GT what he recommended.
ISO 3200. 25 second exposures. And I decided to give the camera a 2 sec delay, and a 3 sec storage pause.
So my exposures were 5 seconds apart (total), and each 25 seconds long.
These are amassed on a 64G fast SD Card.

In retrospect, maybe a faster (lower F-stop than 3.5) lens would have changed the game.
I have always liked time lapse photography.

But the meteors I did catch were (obviously at 25 seconds) only a single frame out of hundreds.
Airplanes, on the other hand, were 3-4 frames long. Slow pokes that they are. ;)

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 12:26:22   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
And with the clouds I'm back turning pens.
This is from the Myrtle you sent me.

Myrtles curves.
Myrtles curves....
(Download)

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 13:15:03   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Myrtle is looking pretty sexy there....

Woo-Hoo!

On the 11th, GT, Hanna, and I decided we really did not care what the weather might bring. We were going to have fun in spite of it.
So Gordon showed us "Light Painting" and we had a blast with it.
Hanna was taking a lot of great shots, while I was trying my best to keep up.
Point being, damn the weather, have fun!

With a little creativity, I could see Myrtle developing a bust line along that upper curve.... :twisted: ;)
(Yep, I am hopelessly a red blooded American male...)

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 13:32:52   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
SonnyE wrote:
Myrtle is looking pretty sexy there....

Woo-Hoo!

On the 11th, GT, Hanna, and I decided we really did not care what the weather might bring. We were going to have fun in spite of it.
So Gordon showed us "Light Painting" and we had a blast with it.
Hanna was taking a lot of great shots, while I was trying my best to keep up.
Point being, damn the weather, have fun!

With a little creativity, I could see Myrtle developing a bust line along that upper curve.... :twisted: ;)
(Yep, I am hopelessly a red blooded American male...)
Myrtle is looking pretty sexy there.... br br Woo... (show quote)


Whoa, look at you and your new avatar..
Nice!

Reply
 
 
Aug 19, 2015 13:42:57   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
Whoa, look at you and your new avatar..
Nice!


That is Thanks to GTinSoCal!

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 14:11:18   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
SonnyE wrote:
I was having trouble with my settings, so I asked GT what he recommended.
ISO 3200. 25 second exposures. And I decided to give the camera a 2 sec delay, and a 3 sec storage pause.
So my exposures were 5 seconds apart (total), and each 25 seconds long.
These are amassed on a 64G fast SD Card.

In retrospect, maybe a faster (lower F-stop than 3.5) lens would have changed the game.
I have always liked time lapse photography.

But the meteors I did catch were (obviously at 25 seconds) only a single frame out of hundreds.
Airplanes, on the other hand, were 3-4 frames long. Slow pokes that they are. ;)
I was having trouble with my settings, so I asked ... (show quote)

On my Tokina 16-28 f/2.8 I have tried the f/3.5 & f/4 and didn't like them as much as the f/2.8 at 25 sec and ISO 800. The faster f/stop allowed me to lower the the ISO which I think gives me a cleaner, less noisy shot.
This shot is actually shot at ISO 200, 30 sec & f/2.8, 16mm

Processed in Lightroom
Processed in Lightroom...
(Download)

Original
Original...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 14:38:14   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
CraigFair wrote:
On my Tokina 16-28 f/2.8 I have tried the f/3.5 & f/4 and didn't like them as much as the f/2.8 at 25 sec and ISO 800. The faster f/stop allowed me to lower the the ISO which I think gives me a cleaner, less noisy shot.
This shot is actually shot at ISO 200, 30 sec & f/2.8, 16mm


And... your original after I tried my hand with it. :-o
That is a beautiful shot, Craig. ;)

I did an Auto Adjust of Brightness and Contrast; Then cranked the contrast out to 100% to get the sky black again.

As much as I don't like it, I'm becoming a PP pooper.

Craigs original after I fiddled with it mildly in Elements 12
Craigs original after I fiddled with it mildly in ...
(Download)

Reply
Aug 19, 2015 14:47:32   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Since I retired, Jim, I just don't see how I had time to waste at work. ;)
I look forward to you finding the freedom Retirement will bring. :)

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.