Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
New Nikon 24-70 mm with VR coming.
Aug 10, 2015 18:46:28   #
Boney Loc: Huntington Beach
 
I have the present Nikon 24-70 mm, f2.8 lens without VR. I shoot a D7000 and a D800E but suffer from a tremor. I depend on the mass of these DSLRs and lenses to steady my shake. I have hardly used this lens because of the lack of VR, which really helps me. The new lens has changed the optics in addition to adding the VR.
My question is should I sell my 24-70 mm lens now to get highest value, or wait and see if the new one really performs better. My lens has less than 50 shots through it, virtually untouched by human hands, except for mine.

Reply
Aug 10, 2015 19:39:26   #
coj Loc: NJ, USA
 
For your purpose it would seem that the VRII is essential. Nikon usually does not put out worse optics in a series than a previous lens, so IMHO I would sell the one you have now before the price drops when the new one comes out.

Reply
Aug 11, 2015 07:50:21   #
The Villages Loc: The Villages, Florida
 
Life's to short. Go for it!

Reply
 
 
Aug 11, 2015 08:05:03   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
Boney wrote:
I have the present Nikon 24-70 mm, f2.8 lens without VR. I shoot a D7000 and a D800E but suffer from a tremor. I depend on the mass of these DSLRs and lenses to steady my shake. I have hardly used this lens because of the lack of VR, which really helps me. The new lens has changed the optics in addition to adding the VR.
My question is should I sell my 24-70 mm lens now to get highest value, or wait and see if the new one really performs better. My lens has less than 50 shots through it, virtually untouched by human hands, except for mine.
I have the present Nikon 24-70 mm, f2.8 lens witho... (show quote)

That's always the question: when to sell the old to buy the new. Generally speaking, prices for old gear do not rise. Another generality: Nikon does not replace great lenses with inferior ones.

Read all you can about the new lens. If there is something major you don't like, keep what you have. Otherwise, put it on ebay, and you'll have your money in a week.

Reply
Aug 11, 2015 10:09:27   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Boney wrote:
I have the present Nikon 24-70 mm, f2.8 lens without VR. I shoot a D7000 and a D800E but suffer from a tremor. I depend on the mass of these DSLRs and lenses to steady my shake. I have hardly used this lens because of the lack of VR, which really helps me. The new lens has changed the optics in addition to adding the VR.
My question is should I sell my 24-70 mm lens now to get highest value, or wait and see if the new one really performs better. My lens has less than 50 shots through it, virtually untouched by human hands, except for mine.
I have the present Nikon 24-70 mm, f2.8 lens witho... (show quote)


You do need VR if you are not going to be using a tripod or a high ISO for a faster shutter speed.
Right now all we know about the new lens is that it is very expensive, I believe around $2,236. Like yours, the new lens is a professional lens with new coatings and a new optical formula plus the needed VR. If you have the money and persist on buying the lens you know what you have to do. Soon we will know of its optical abilities.
Tamron also makes a very nice similar optics with VR at a more reasonable price. If you are not going to enlarge to 20x30 often this Tamron lens could be a very good alternative for considerable less money.

Reply
Aug 11, 2015 10:25:20   #
Mark7829 Loc: Calfornia
 
BTW, the lens you have is exceptional, if not one the finest ever made. You will likely get a good price now or later. If you were to buy a Tamron or other you could lose the resale value. Although, Tamron is getting much better.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.