StevenG Loc: Long Island, NY

Before I begin, let me say this is not meant to open any new debates about Canon vs Nikon. I presently use a Canon 60D, which my wife got me for my 65th birthday. As I approach my 70th birthday, both my camera and I are getting a bit worn. The camera is giving me a little trouble (doesn't always function when the shutter is depressed). This is the second issue I had with the camera, and at this point I don't want to spend $250 for a repair. (That is my estimate, based on previous service.) Also, In the five years I have used the camera, I am beginning to outgrow it, and I am looking to upgrade.

I shoot mostly travel photos, which include many landscapes, seascapes, cityscapes, buildings and dimly lit building interiors. I also shoot many portraits of my grandchildren. I do no sport or wildlife photography. I do my own printing with an Epson 3880.

I would like to upgrade to a full frame camera. I was looking at the Canon 7D Mark II, which I know is a crop sensor, but which by all reports an awesome camera. However, the 10 frames per second is overkill for me, and it is still a crop sensor. I am also looking at the Canon 5D Mark III. Again, an awesome camera by all reports. However, it still sells for $2499 at B and H, although I think it can be purchased for less, or possibly offered with rebates. However, if the Mark IV is ever released (early next year?), I am still purchasing a great camera (in the Mark III), but probably lacking the latest technology. Also, the Mark III weighs 1.89 pounds, without battery. Weight is important to me, as I travel frequently, and don't enjoy lugging around any more than necessary. And, the Mark IV, if it is released, will probably sell for more than $2499.

I also considered the Canon 6D. A very good entry level Full Frame camera for $1399 at B and H. However, the 11 focus points, (1 cross type) is a deal breaker.

This brings me to the Nikon D750. Again, by all accounts, a great camera. In fact, in all comparison reviews I read, it "beats" the Mark III in most specs, and outperforms it in many areas, including better detail in shadow areas, which I consider important for many landscapes. And, it only weighs 1.65 pounds, less than my Canon 60D! and costs $1997 at B and H.

In terms of Canon equipment, I am not very heavily invested. I use a Tamron 18-270, (canon mount, obviously), Canon 50mm f1.8, and the Canon 430EXII speedilte. I realize I would have to bite the bullet on this stuff. (Although I don't know if the speedilte will work on the Nikon.)

So, I am not asking if I should switch from Canon to Nikon. Based on my desire to upgrade, and the type of photos I am interested in, weight, and price, (and I know I will need to purchase new lenses) I am interested in your opinions as to weather or not the Nikon D750 is the best fit for my needs.

dmsM43

If you are that concerned about weight, you should take a look at mirrorless cameras. Sony makes 3 full frame models, the A7ii, A7rii, and the A7s, as well as crop sensor models like the a6000. Fuji, Olympus, and Panasonic also make mirrorless crop sensor cameras. And since you don't have a lot invested in lenses, you are free to choose whatever you think will work best for you. Personally, if weight is a big issue, I would stick with the crop sensor cameras. I have the Olympus OMD E-M1 and it's amazing in low light with little noise even at ISO 1600. Also the lenses for crop sensor cameras are smaller and lighter in weight as well.

Bill Emmett Loc: Bow, New Hampshire

Take a look at "Canonpricewatch.com" for their street pricing on the Mark III, and refurbished prices for the Mark III. You may also want to check "KEH.com" for a excellent used Canon Mark III. If you stay with Canon be prepared for Canon "L" quality lenses, and prices. Today on Canon Price Watch, there is a deal for the Mark III, with 24-105mm f4L IS lens that sounds pretty good. If you're still intent on the Nikon, enjoy your new camera.

Terrym9 Loc: Hillsboro, Oregon

Steve, I cannot say if the d750 will fit your needs, but it has certainly filled mine. I grappled for about a year coming up with which camera to upgrade to. I had decided on the d810 with some reservations because of file size and I wanted more frames per second. The d750 was announced and it seemed like exactly what I was looking for. The autofocus and low light capabilities are what I really enjoy. I always read that the camera is not what makes the picture, but for me it has certainly improved mine. I can foresee using this for many years. I purchased the 24-120 f4 lens also and have really liked it. I have taken about 6000 pictures with it since last November

Terry

Terry

CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City

Steve - I see Bill E already recommended shopping around for new and used 5DIII prices. You're still going to be the best judge of the camera body that best fits your needs. The focus system on the 5DIII is a dream where you can group clusters of 9 from the 61 total focus points. Or, pick one or a small group of 5 from any of all 61 (depending the lens used). As Bill also pointed out, the 24-105L is IS enabled and well discounted in both the new and used market given this was the kit lens for a number of full frame packages as well as sold separately.

The cameras are always going to be leapfrogging each other. No matter what you buy, something better will be out 6-months later. Personally, I plan to stretch my 5DIII for 10-years and I've had a focus on glass since getting the camera litely used now two years ago.

Starting over is fine. Someone seems to do it every month or so here. I find the Nikon bodies to be smaller and the menus confusing after now having shot Canon digitally for 10-years. The results are the same when comparing apples to apples between competing models. I see others have suggested mirrorless and maybe that's the direction, regardless of vendor, you should consider. The long-term direction does seem to be mirrorless in single lens cameras ...

/paul

rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin

Steve - the D750 is a fine camera. I'm sure you would be happy being challenged by its capabilities. You are clearly a thoughtful individual who researches new directions carefully. I have a very good friend who has begun to make a living as a professional photographer primarily shooting portraits and commercial architecture. He uses a D610. I know you will look at the D610 as somewhat older technology, but his results have been nothing less than spectacular. Give it some thought, perhaps as a stepping stone to a future D6xx/7xx or D8xx/9xx. Sincere best wishes for an enjoyable journey.

SharpShooter Loc: NorCal

Steven, you will get what you will get or at least have to have regardless of what anyone tells you!! I assume your mind is already made up.
I'm gonna work this slightly in reverse for you, see if you can keep up?!
What little I have seen, nowhere have I seen that the 750 is better than the 810. That makes the 810 better than the 750. Are you following me?!
Now, in most head to head comparrisons I have seen, the 5lll comes out on top of the 810. I'll give you one example so you can Google it, there are many. Google DigitalCameraWorld, Nikon 810 vs Canon 5D mklll. DO read the entire thing or skip to the very last paragraph, were they conclude, after taking into account ALL the DXO data, that the 5lll is a BETTER all-around camera than the 810!!!

So, if the 5lll is better than the 810, then in my little pea-brain, it MUST be better than a 750 as well. Steven, are you still following me?!

But hey, some find satisfaction in going backwards!!! Good luck! ;-)
SS

bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.

just my opinion, I think you are creating the delemma. I doubt that you've "outgrown" that camera. canon has plenty of camera models, even used ones", that would do.i have 5 dslr's 3 bridge, and 1 p&s dating back to 2001, if i'm lucky, I've out grown only 2 of them.

Shutter Bugger

The OP may (or may not) be going backwards if he went from a 5III, however that is not the case.

Going from what he has to a D750 is a quantum leap
forward... and up.

Furthermore a D750 cost about $1000 less than a 5III.

The D810 is a similar cost to the 5III... and the D810 has a far wider
(holy grail imho) dynamic range. And I wont mention pixel count
if you dont. Hardy haha!

DaveHam Loc: Reading UK

Where Nikon leads today in DSLR technology Canon will lead tomorrow - the manufacturers are always playing catch up as they continue to add features and functionality.

Unless some feature is truly stand out, such as low light performance with say a stop advantage over the competition, switching bodies simply means having to learn a new camera and invest in new lenses.

One area Nikon used to lead was in image quality in it's pro lenses - but in the last few years Canon has closed that gap somewhat.

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

Based on what you currently own, you are NOT "invested" in a Canon system... you merely own a few items, so a switch to any other system should be rather painless. A D750 is an excellent camera, and if it's greater dynamic range that you are after, then go for it! After you buy it, make sure you get good/ great glass, and that's where the rubber meets the road. Choose carefully, buy once.

heyjoe Loc: cincinnati ohio

the nikons are a better value,canon sells for more on the used market,

RON 11 Loc: Pittsburgh

I started with a borrowed Can 35 years ago but selected Nikon when it was time to buy my own. The primary reason was lens mounts. And that reason is still valid today. From at least the 70000 series thru all of their fx bodies you can use virtually any Nikon lens ever made. That gives a person access to some fabulous legacy lenses. Depending on where live, you do need to try the 750 out to see if the weight and balance are comfortable for you. Rent. One, if you need to. I am 72 and find I have trouble using long lenses handheld and have come to avoid them. Just sayin.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

I've always shot with Nikon SLR's, and I currently use the D750 - an excellent camera. Read some comparisons and decide what featrues are important to you.

http://camerasize.com/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
http://snapsort.com/compare
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/cameras?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_medium=text&ref=mainmenu

steveg48

I would suggest considering one of the sony mirrorless full frame cameras, perhaps the a7ii. This has in-body image stabilization which means that your shots are stabilized with any lens. Also there are adapters available which will let you use yor Canon lenses.