Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
For Your Consideration
Moment in Time
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 5, 2015 14:59:50   #
Frank2013 Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
 
ediesaul wrote:
I would not hang such a photo on my wall.


None of my business, so don't feel obligated to answer ediesaul. I don't know if it would be a main attraction on one of my walls but if I had taken it I would certainly not be opposed to it being on my wall. Why would it not go on your wall?

Reply
Aug 5, 2015 15:21:48   #
ediesaul
 
Frank2013 wrote:
None of my business, so don't feel obligated to answer ediesaul. I don't know if it would be a main attraction on one of my walls but if I had taken it I would certainly not be opposed to it being on my wall. Why would it not go on your wall?


I might hang your version on my wall; not mine!

Reply
Aug 5, 2015 15:59:35   #
Frank2013 Loc: San Antonio, TX. & Milwaukee, WI.
 
ediesaul wrote:
I might hang your version on my wall; not mine!


You are very kind ediesaul, I am enjoying watching you grow, by leaps and bounds I might add.

Reply
 
 
Aug 5, 2015 16:07:31   #
minniev Loc: MIssissippi
 
ediesaul wrote:
I would classify this photo as a "moment in time," which might serve a sociological purpose in the future, just as a photo of a 1950s soda fountain counter might.

But, just because the photo might end up in a museum with other photos of the early 2000s, is it art?

Certainly it was taken purposefully. For me, "purposefully-taken" does not, per se, make a piece "art."

What do you think?
Do you think that "creative pp " could transform this photo into art? If yes, I don't mind your playing with the photo to demonstrate your point.

Thanks.
I would classify this photo as a "moment in t... (show quote)


I agree with several others who find this less engaging than it could be. What's missing is the ingredient that Graham Smith so often treats us to in his street photography: an interesting human face, with expression of some sort. Your people are marginalized by having their backs turned or looking out the side of the frame. And there is too much unproductive space in the center.

There is some interesting detail in the place and Frank's version made the most of that. Sometimes detail shots inside a store or restaurant can be quite interesting, but we as humans are most fascinated by other humans :-D

Art is a whole different argument. I lean towards the more liberal interpretation of art, while some have extremely conservative definitions and some say they know it when when they see it. Some even deny that a photograph can be art. So obviously the definitions are not yet universalized.

You keep marching on Edie. Your artistic spirit will eventually guide you to where you feel the most creative and productive, but I bet you always experiment, as do some of us other folk here.

Reply
Aug 5, 2015 17:25:10   #
ediesaul
 
Frank2013 wrote:
You are very kind ediesaul, I am enjoying watching you grow, by leaps and bounds I might add.


Very nice of you to say. Sometimes I'm pretty discouraged, but I love photography, so I'm out there every day, and, with such learned, encouraging, and generous people to interact with, I enjoy my time on UH very much.

Reply
Aug 5, 2015 17:27:46   #
ediesaul
 
minniev wrote:
I agree with several others who find this less engaging than it could be. What's missing is the ingredient that Graham Smith so often treats us to in his street photography: an interesting human face, with expression of some sort. Your people are marginalized by having their backs turned or looking out the side of the frame. And there is too much unproductive space in the center.

There is some interesting detail in the place and Frank's version made the most of that. Sometimes detail shots inside a store or restaurant can be quite interesting, but we as humans are most fascinated by other humans :-D

Art is a whole different argument. I lean towards the more liberal interpretation of art, while some have extremely conservative definitions and some say they know it when when they see it. Some even deny that a photograph can be art. So obviously the definitions are not yet universalized.

You keep marching on Edie. Your artistic spirit will eventually guide you to where you feel the most creative and productive, but I bet you always experiment, as do some of us other folk here.
I agree with several others who find this less eng... (show quote)


Thanks for your comments, minniev. I appreciate what you have to say. Bob Yankle also suggested that I should have tried to get more of the foreground woman's face, and Frank's photo is way superior to mine. I had an idea and flew it by, and I'm learning!

Reply
Aug 7, 2015 18:47:37   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
ediesaul wrote:
I would classify this photo as a "moment in time," which might serve a sociological purpose in the future, just as a photo of a 1950s soda fountain counter might.

But, just because the photo might end up in a museum with other photos of the early 2000s, is it art?

Certainly it was taken purposefully. For me, "purposefully-taken" does not, per se, make a piece "art."

What do you think?
Do you think that "creative pp " could transform this photo into art? If yes, I don't mind your playing with the photo to demonstrate your point.

Thanks.
I would classify this photo as a "moment in t... (show quote)


I understand what you are getting at. The problem with this image as I see it is simple. The biggest element in the photo which is the woman on the left is. Unfortunately, she is looking out of the frame. For composition this is a mistake. Keep the rule of thirds in mind and be sure you know what your subject is. I like the feeling of this photo, though. It does preserve a moment. What is happening at that moment is, however, important. Unfortunately this moment seems a bit uneventful. It is hard for me to figure out what the story is.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.