Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Planned Parenthood... STRIKE TWO!!!
Page <prev 2 of 19 next> last>>
Jul 22, 2015 16:02:52   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
idaholover wrote:
You are a great example of the Karma thing if there were one.


Hi, Spud, welcome back! Good to see that you haven't lost your talent for witless invective.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 16:40:02   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
dljen wrote:
Great article George, it's just the religious crazies who wouldn't want this done. Personally, I would prefer fetuses be used to practice medical research but the nut jobs go wild. A******ns have been done throughout history and will continue to be.


It wasn't an article it was an opinion! DSD, dumb as hell!

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 17:07:10   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
idaholover wrote:
It wasn't an article it was an opinion! DSD, dumb as hell!


Woohoo! Touched a nerve, did we? Yes, there was opinion in the NYTimes editorial, that being that Faux News was either suckered by the heavily edited video clip, or that they were willing participants in what amounts to journalistic fraud. To refresh your memory:

"The full video of the lunch meeting, over two hours long and released by the Center for Medical Progress after complaints by Planned Parenthood, shows something very different from what these critics claim. Clearly, the shorter version was edited to eliminate statements by Dr. Nucatola explaining that Planned Parenthood does not profit from tissue donation, which requires the clear consent of the patient. Planned Parenthood affiliates only accept money — between $30 and $100 per specimen, according to Dr. Nucatola — to cover costs associated with collecting and t***sporting the tissue. “This is not something with any revenue stream that affiliates are looking at,” she said. Under federal law, facilities may be reimbursed for costs associated with fetal tissue donation, like t***sportation and storage."

Have another look at my post of the full editorial. Or you can find it on the Times website for today. Do note that "Center for Medical Progress" would seem to be a one-trick pony existing primarily for attacking Planned Parenthood and probably other pro-choice groups. Note also that the Manhattan Institute has a "Center for Medical Progress" which looks to be a legitimate group. I wonder how the Manhattan Institute feels about possible confusion with the group featured in the Faux News feature. I'd bet they aren't amused. What do you think??

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2015 17:14:41   #
dljen Loc: Central PA
 
George, you do understand how these overly religious RWNJ's have trouble understanding, don't you? Anything involving science and research is an unknown to them.

Better let Spud go so he can go get Dino and ride him to the local watering hole. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 17:18:57   #
SBW
 
GeorgeH wrote:
I wonder, did any of you bother to READ the editorial I posted from the NY Times? Perhaps that was too much work?


Yes, I held my nose and read it. But there is an unedited video you can watch that refutes almost all of it. I would expect the NY Times to defend the indefensible. Par for the course. The videos from Planned Parenthood are real, they said it, they meant it and not a million opinion pieces from the NY Times will make that go away. The T***H is very stubborn. Facts are stubborn. If you defend Planned Parenthood you are defending the indefensible. No matter what your political stripe, SELLING the body parts of unborn INFANTS is beyond horrible.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 17:24:19   #
SBW
 
GeorgeH wrote:
Woohoo! Touched a nerve, did we? Yes, there was opinion in the NYTimes editorial, that being that Faux News was either suckered by the heavily edited video clip, or that they were willing participants in what amounts to journalistic fraud. To refresh your memory:

"The full video of the lunch meeting, over two hours long and released by the Center for Medical Progress after complaints by Planned Parenthood, shows something very different from what these critics claim. Clearly, the shorter version was edited to eliminate statements by Dr. Nucatola explaining that Planned Parenthood does not profit from tissue donation, which requires the clear consent of the patient. Planned Parenthood affiliates only accept money — between $30 and $100 per specimen, according to Dr. Nucatola — to cover costs associated with collecting and t***sporting the tissue. “This is not something with any revenue stream that affiliates are looking at,” she said. Under federal law, facilities may be reimbursed for costs associated with fetal tissue donation, like t***sportation and storage."

Have another look at my post of the full editorial. Or you can find it on the Times website for today. Do note that "Center for Medical Progress" would seem to be a one-trick pony existing primarily for attacking Planned Parenthood and probably other pro-choice groups. Note also that the Manhattan Institute has a "Center for Medical Progress" which looks to be a legitimate group. I wonder how the Manhattan Institute feels about possible confusion with the group featured in the Faux News feature. I'd bet they aren't amused. What do you think??
Woohoo! Touched a nerve, did we? Yes, there was ... (show quote)


You feeble, old lying, decrepit, miscreant. The more you defend this the stupider you look. I did not think that was possible.

Maybe one of your potential grand kids will end up on the market.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 17:37:52   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
SBW wrote:
You feeble, old lying, decrepit, miscreant. The more you defend this the stupider you look. I did not think that was possible.

Maybe one of your potential grand kids will end up on the market.


Ah, yes! SBW, who substitutes invective and insults for the thought process. Do call home, the pond scum from which you arose awaits your return. Remember to take your psychotropics, your mind is wandering and its too small to be out alone. We try to look out for the intellectually challenged here on UHH. Toddle along, now. Thats a good little boy!

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2015 17:44:39   #
SBW
 
GeorgeH wrote:
Ah, yes! SBW, who substitutes invective and insults for the thought process. Do call home, the pond scum from which you arose awaits your return. Remember to take your psychotropics, your mind is wandering and its too small to be out alone. We try to look out for the intellectually challenged here on UHH. Toddle along, now. Thats a good little boy!


That is right senile old fart. You really cannot defend it so change the subject.

Come on, keep coming back you old fool. Stupid is as stupid does. Why don't you go and defend the N**is for awhile. That seems your speed. I hear they are looking for body parts for experiments. You certainly have the contacts, don't you?

If you cannot stay on the subject, shut your stupid, ignorant mouth.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 17:44:47   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
dljen wrote:
They'd be whining loudly demanding that their condition be addressed any way possible but you know, George, how science is regarded by them. They want only to be firmly entrenched in the 1950's, they haven't evolved nor do they realize that it's 2015. It's pitiful.

I do believe there is payback in life, that Karma really does exist. It would be such a shame that any of them suffer from a disease that could be cured if scientists used stem cell research on fetuses. Why would anyone want something disposed when it could be of beneficial use to living beings? Confusing as hell. Thanks George. :)
They'd be whining loudly demanding that their cond... (show quote)


Funny, I don't think any of us are using 1950's computers.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 18:07:18   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
SBW wrote:
That is right senile old fart. You really cannot defend it so change the subject.

Come on, keep coming back you old fool. Stupid is as stupid does. Why don't you go and defend the N**is for awhile. That seems your speed. I hear they are looking for body parts for experiments. You certainly have the contacts, don't you?

If you cannot stay on the subject, shut your stupid, ignorant mouth.


Well, you referred to a video which would prove all. How about a link? As far as straying from the subject, you and some of your fellow trolls go far afield from any subject save vilification, the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 18:40:31   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
SBW wrote:
Here is your karma trixie. Think about this a lot trixie. This is your science, this is your karma. Coming to you soon trixie.


It's a (was going to be) Boy!

Birth control by murder. You've come a long way, Baby!

How many does it take to make a meal for George and Donna? Yum! :hunf:

Reply
 
 
Jul 22, 2015 18:52:19   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
SonnyE wrote:
It's a (was going to be) Boy!

Birth control by murder. You've come a long way, Baby!

How many does it take to make a meal for George and Donna? Yum! :hunf:


Well, Sonny. Your rather maniacal avatar says a lot about you. Looks as though your BP is through the roof. Lie down in a dark room..... How about some Lithium Carbonate for your manic depressive self? You seem really cowardly to hop in to this "discussion" without posting anything of substance. Or do you just like to stir the s**t as one might say??

Drivel posts, unencumbered by the thought process. Fit you, Bug Eyes?? Thought so.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 19:06:03   #
phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO
 
I think every woman who get an a******n should have to view the procedure on video upon completion of the process. Why should the folks who elect to murder their babies be insulated from the process that took their babies lives.
When I was in Vietnam, we witnessed the result of what we did, and we were fighting to keep others from k*****g us. These women should see the babies who were attempting to attack them.

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 19:09:41   #
idaholover Loc: Nampa ID
 
GeorgeH wrote:
Woohoo! Touched a nerve, did we? Yes, there was opinion in the NYTimes editorial, that being that Faux News was either suckered by the heavily edited video clip, or that they were willing participants in what amounts to journalistic fraud. To refresh your memory:

"The full video of the lunch meeting, over two hours long and released by the Center for Medical Progress after complaints by Planned Parenthood, shows something very different from what these critics claim. Clearly, the shorter version was edited to eliminate statements by Dr. Nucatola explaining that Planned Parenthood does not profit from tissue donation, which requires the clear consent of the patient. Planned Parenthood affiliates only accept money — between $30 and $100 per specimen, according to Dr. Nucatola — to cover costs associated with collecting and t***sporting the tissue. “This is not something with any revenue stream that affiliates are looking at,” she said. Under federal law, facilities may be reimbursed for costs associated with fetal tissue donation, like t***sportation and storage."

Have another look at my post of the full editorial. Or you can find it on the Times website for today. Do note that "Center for Medical Progress" would seem to be a one-trick pony existing primarily for attacking Planned Parenthood and probably other pro-choice groups. Note also that the Manhattan Institute has a "Center for Medical Progress" which looks to be a legitimate group. I wonder how the Manhattan Institute feels about possible confusion with the group featured in the Faux News feature. I'd bet they aren't amused. What do you think??
Woohoo! Touched a nerve, did we? Yes, there was ... (show quote)


Wow! Guess I'm the one who touched a nerve!

Chill out big guy!
"The Opinion Pages | EDITORIAL

The Campaign of Deception Against Planned Parenthood
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD JULY 22, 2015"


Maybe you are the one not reading your own excrement!

Reply
Jul 22, 2015 19:11:09   #
GeorgeH Loc: Jonesboro, GA
 
phcaan wrote:
I think every woman who get an a******n should have to view the procedure on video upon completion of the process. Why should the folks who elect to murder their babies be insulated from the process that took their babies lives.
When I was in Vietnam, we witnessed the result of what we did, heand we were fighting to keep others from k*****g us. These women should see the babies who were attempting to attack them.


Let me get back to you. Its time for dinner here, and you raise some interesting points.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.