warwoman wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/undercover-video-shows-planned-parenthood-exec-discussing-organ-harvesting/2015/07/14/ae330e34-2a4d-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
What's wrong with that? I really don't understand these anti-a******nists. One minute they're saying that an undeveloped embryo is a sacred life, the next minute they want it flushed down a toilet and so to have not had any use.
Wellhiem wrote:
What's wrong with that? I really don't understand these anti-a******nists. One minute they're saying that an undeveloped embryo is a sacred life, the next minute they want it flushed down a toilet and so to have not had any use.
Undeveloped?? I would think it would have to be developed for the organ store (PPA) to want the parts, hence it's a human. See, the pro life folks don't want to "flush" anything down the toilet, like some used piece of toilet paper. That's your domain!
warwoman wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/undercover-video-shows-planned-parenthood-exec-discussing-organ-harvesting/2015/07/14/ae330e34-2a4d-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
This will not even phase them. They could care less about human life.
SBW wrote:
This will not even phase them. They could care less about human life.
I know. I just thought Pa. lady might get her jollies off watching it!
warwoman wrote:
I know. I just thought Pa. lady might get her jollies off watching it!
Wonder if she has hers in a mason jar on the mantle?
warwoman wrote:
Undeveloped?? I would think it would have to be developed for the organ store (PPA) to want the parts, hence it's a human. See, the pro life folks don't want to "flush" anything down the toilet, like some used piece of toilet paper. That's your domain!
They're not after organs. They're after stem cells, which could be grown in a Petri dish using donor eggs and sperm. Unfortunately that's not an avenue open to them.
warwoman wrote:
I know. I just thought Pa. lady might get her jollies off watching it!
Do you mean Donna Dim-Witt, WW? I haven't heard anything out of her for a few days, (thank heavens ); maybe another one of those "k**ler truck drivers" "flattened her out" again?
Wellhiem wrote:
What's wrong with that? I really don't understand these anti-a******nists. One minute they're saying that an undeveloped embryo is a sacred life, the next minute they want it flushed down a toilet and so to have not had any use.
Ja Vilhelm, this is exactly the same as finding worth in lamp shades made of human skin from N**i concentration camps.... so tell me first hand, how does a newspaper read from the light filtered through such a lamp shade after you've washing in soap made from the same? How much can I purchase your mothers skull for, your child's liver?
RichieC wrote:
Ja Vilhelm, this is exactly the same as finding worth in lamp shades made of human skin from N**i concentration camps.... so tell me first hand, how does a newspaper read from the light filtered through such a lamp shade after you've washing in soap made from the same? How much can I purchase your mothers skull for, your child's liver?
The fact is, once an embryo has been aborted, that's it. It's been done, whether you like it or not. The only question is what do you do with it. You can either flush it, or you can use the stem cells, to grow organs to be used in t***splants. Your views on a******n are irrelevant. The choice is flush it, or use it to save other lives. Which would you prefer?
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
warwoman wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/undercover-video-shows-planned-parenthood-exec-discussing-organ-harvesting/2015/07/14/ae330e34-2a4d-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html
First of all, these right wing hit outfits have a long and sordid history of editing things out of context to make things are completely different from what they are (Brietbart, O'Keefe, etc., and etc., ad infinitum). So any fair minded person would want to see the raw video before pissing their pants.
Secondly, there appears to be no specific reference to selling body parts, as the Wahington Post noted.
Thirdly, organ and tissue donation is perfectly legal and is, in fact, a laudable thing to do as it both saves lives and advances science.
Bazbo
Loc: Lisboa, Portugal
RichieC wrote:
Ja Vilhelm, this is exactly the same as finding worth in lamp shades made of human skin from N**i concentration camps.... so tell me first hand, how does a newspaper read from the light filtered through such a lamp shade after you've washing in soap made from the same? How much can I purchase your mothers skull for, your child's liver?
Playing the N**i card again, are we? Repulsive.
A******n is legal and the death camps were not. Tissue donation saves lives and advances science. Also legal. The lampshades were not.
Your attempted argument using this analogy is both insipid and foolish.
Wellhiem wrote:
What's wrong with that? I really don't understand these anti-a******nists. One minute they're saying that an undeveloped embryo is a sacred life, the next minute they want it flushed down a toilet and so to have not had any use.
Because we think that the baby dead or alive is sacred and not to be used for body parts. It's kind of ironic, women that support a******ns and say it's THEIR bodies are the same ones that are supporting the marketing of the BABIES own bodies. So women have the "right" to abort a baby because it's HER body, yet now the baby is out of the womb, it's still the woman's body even though it is not part of her body "any longer".
Bazbo wrote:
First of all, these right wing hit outfits have a long and sordid history of editing things out of context to make things are completely different from what they are (Brietbart, O'Keefe, etc., and etc., ad infinitum). So any fair minded person would want to see the raw video before pissing their pants.
Secondly, there appears to be no specific reference to selling body parts, as the Wahington Post noted.
Thirdly, organ and tissue donation is perfectly legal and is, in fact, a laudable thing to do as it both saves lives and advances science.
First of all, these right wing hit outfits have a ... (
show quote)
Yes but isn't organ and tissue donations legal only if the persons who's body is being donated have to be voluntary?
Bazbo wrote:
Playing the N**i card again, are we? Repulsive.
A******n is legal and the death camps were not. Tissue donation saves lives and advances science. Also legal. The lampshades were not.
Your attempted argument using this analogy is both insipid and foolish.
The death camps and lampshades were legal in n**i Germany at the time.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.