$ 3.5 Billion in taxmoney to study "fat lesbians"
Jul 14, 2015 16:53:39 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
$ 3.5 Billion spent already to study why lesbians are statistically far more likely to be obese than non-lesbians. The study doesn't even address the billion dollar question of where "bi" women fit in.
Coming up: A multi-billion dollar study to find out why gay men are statistically more fit than "breeder" men. Maybe there will be a billion or so left to spend on the issue of whether gay men dress better than breeders.
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/taxpayers-continue-spend-millions-find-out-why-lesbians-are-fat#.ltn1qh:KYGs
Coming up: A multi-billion dollar study to find out why gay men are statistically more fit than "breeder" men. Maybe there will be a billion or so left to spend on the issue of whether gay men dress better than breeders.
http://www.mrctv.org/blog/taxpayers-continue-spend-millions-find-out-why-lesbians-are-fat#.ltn1qh:KYGs
Jul 14, 2015 17:09:21 #
I don't think I want to study fat lesbians.....
not even for $3.5 billion dollars.
not even for $3.5 billion dollars.
Jul 14, 2015 17:12:57 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
$ 3.5 Billion spent already to study why lesbians ... (show quote)
I could answer that question for $50.
Jul 14, 2015 18:32:31 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
RixPix wrote:
I could answer that question for $50.
Raise your rate to $500,000 and get to know some politicians and maybe you can get a grant ...
Jul 14, 2015 18:40:35 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
Note to everyone: I made a typo. It was merely many millions of dollars wasted, not billions.
As to billions, we're about to hand Iran $150 Billion as a thank you for signing our "agreement" and continuing their work toward getting nukes and becoming a nuclear jihadist. That's if congress is insane enough to ratify the agreement.
As to billions, we're about to hand Iran $150 Billion as a thank you for signing our "agreement" and continuing their work toward getting nukes and becoming a nuclear jihadist. That's if congress is insane enough to ratify the agreement.
Jul 14, 2015 19:02:39 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
Note to everyone: I made a typo. It was merely many millions of dollars wasted, not billions.
As to billions, we're about to hand Iran $150 Billion as a thank you for signing our "agreement" and continuing their work toward getting nukes and becoming a nuclear jihadist. That's if congress is insane enough to ratify the agreement.
As to billions, we're about to hand Iran $150 Billion as a thank you for signing our "agreement" and continuing their work toward getting nukes and becoming a nuclear jihadist. That's if congress is insane enough to ratify the agreement.
The way I read the Iran thing, is that the US agree to lift trade embargoes, in return for Iran allowing rigorous weapons inspections. How does that help them get nukes? Sorry it's a bit off topic, but it is your thread and you took it off topic.
Jul 14, 2015 19:27:12 #
MRC: Media Researce Center ...
MRCTV is an online media platform designed to broadcast conservative values, culture, politics, liberal media bias, and entertainment to a new and diverse audience on a social media optimized site.
Our goal is to break down the boundaries between traditional conservative media and mainstream culture.
Ideology:
● Homophobia and other positions of fundamentalist Christianity.
● Apologetics for Saint Ronnie, Dubya, and Fox News.
● Persistent racial hatred against Barack Obama.
● The evil media didn't cover all those Bill Clinton scandals.
● Jon Stewart is a big meanie and he's leading the War on Christmas,
just like the 7,873 other guys who previously led it.
● G****l w*****g denialism, as in any media source that doesn't run a
g****l w*****g "skeptic" to counter scientists is clearly liberal; same
for any media source that simply accepts g****l w*****g as real.
Projects:
The MRC runs a conservative-leaning "news" site, CNS News. Also the
MRC's Business and Media Institute complains about how the media
isn't 100% in line with the free market ideology, while at the same time
demanding the government censor "smut". The Culture and Media
Institute vents and reminisces for the good old days when gays had to
stay in the closet and ladies saved themselves for marriage.
The MRC's blog is NewsBusters, with frequent rapid-response blog posts
about the slightest suspicion of liberal bias in media. Given the views
promoted by the MRC, it's best to avoid reading the comments section.
Don't worry, ConWebWatch has screenshots and excerpts from CNS
News comments sections so you don't have to give MRC more traffic to
satisfy your morbid curiosities
FYI: There is no way 3.5 billion was spent on a study. Unless is was Pesos perhaps?
MRCTV is an online media platform designed to broadcast conservative values, culture, politics, liberal media bias, and entertainment to a new and diverse audience on a social media optimized site.
Our goal is to break down the boundaries between traditional conservative media and mainstream culture.
Ideology:
● Homophobia and other positions of fundamentalist Christianity.
● Apologetics for Saint Ronnie, Dubya, and Fox News.
● Persistent racial hatred against Barack Obama.
● The evil media didn't cover all those Bill Clinton scandals.
● Jon Stewart is a big meanie and he's leading the War on Christmas,
just like the 7,873 other guys who previously led it.
● G****l w*****g denialism, as in any media source that doesn't run a
g****l w*****g "skeptic" to counter scientists is clearly liberal; same
for any media source that simply accepts g****l w*****g as real.
Projects:
The MRC runs a conservative-leaning "news" site, CNS News. Also the
MRC's Business and Media Institute complains about how the media
isn't 100% in line with the free market ideology, while at the same time
demanding the government censor "smut". The Culture and Media
Institute vents and reminisces for the good old days when gays had to
stay in the closet and ladies saved themselves for marriage.
The MRC's blog is NewsBusters, with frequent rapid-response blog posts
about the slightest suspicion of liberal bias in media. Given the views
promoted by the MRC, it's best to avoid reading the comments section.
Don't worry, ConWebWatch has screenshots and excerpts from CNS
News comments sections so you don't have to give MRC more traffic to
satisfy your morbid curiosities
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
$ 3.5 Billion spent already to study why lesbians ... (show quote)
FYI: There is no way 3.5 billion was spent on a study. Unless is was Pesos perhaps?
Jul 14, 2015 19:49:42 #
Wellhiem wrote:
The way I read the Iran thing, is that the US agree to lift trade embargoes, in return for Iran allowing rigorous weapons inspections. How does that help them get nukes? Sorry it's a bit off topic, but it is your thread and you took it off topic.
are you that fricking dumb .DO you think the ayatollah & his buddies have any intention of allowing full access to their nuclear facilities .just about the same as Sadaam did??? give me a friggin break .This was just another massive f up by big ears & his lackey Kerry .& guess who pays the bill...
Jul 14, 2015 20:10:39 #
Wellhiem wrote:
The way I read the Iran thing, is that the US agree to lift trade embargoes, in return for Iran allowing rigorous weapons inspections. How does that help them get nukes? Sorry it's a bit off topic, but it is your thread and you took it off topic.
What rigorous inspections. We must give them a 24 day notice of an inspection. Would you approve of a law that gave murders 24 day notice that they would be arrested? The deal is a joke and the laugh is on us
Jul 14, 2015 20:13:28 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
Wellhiem wrote:
Not rigorous, not unlimited, not without notice. Obama is lying about what is allowed and that's even making the i***tic assumption that Iran will live up to the agreement. I***tic because Iran has a pattern of NOT living up to its agreements, and especially not allowing unfettered surprise inspections.The way I read the Iran thing, is that the US agree to lift trade embargoes, in return for Iran allowing rigorous weapons inspections. How does that help them get nukes? Sorry it's a bit off topic, but it is your thread and you took it off topic.
Jul 14, 2015 20:14:28 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
nakkh wrote:
MRC: Media Researce Center ... br MRCTV is an onli... (show quote)
My typo. The enormous amounts are in MILLIONS, not BILLIONS
Jul 14, 2015 20:32:18 #
I saw that after I typed it ... my bad.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
My typo. The enormous amounts are in MILLIONS, not BILLIONS
Jul 14, 2015 22:07:09 #
venturer9
Loc: Newton, Il.
Wellhiem wrote:
The way I read the Iran thing, is that the US agree to lift trade embargoes, in return for Iran allowing rigorous weapons inspections. How does that help them get nukes? Sorry it's a bit off topic, but it is your thread and you took it off topic.
As written it doesn't sound too bad............... But do you BELIEVE that IRAN will uphold its side of the bargain.... Have they done so before?
Mike
Jul 15, 2015 09:50:59 #
venturer9 wrote:
As written it doesn't sound too bad............... But do you BELIEVE that IRAN will uphold its side of the bargain.... Have they done so before?
Mike
Mike
It's the trade embargos that have given rise to ISIS. I think Iran will do anything to stop them. Once ISIS has been dealt with, Iran may well renege on the deal. But that will have to be dealt with if it happens.
Jul 15, 2015 11:21:44 #
NeilL
Loc: British-born Canadian
Robert Graybeal wrote:
I don't think I want to study fat lesbians.....
not even for $3.5 billion dollars.
not even for $3.5 billion dollars.
You can do it for free at your local Walmart.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.