Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
What do you think ,
Mar 25, 2012 14:22:03   #
Dback4430 Loc: Lockport Il
 
Here are a few I took this morning with an EF-S 55-250 IS f/4-5.6, What do you think ? How would l glass look any different ?

ISO 200 f/16 1/100 @ 250mm
ISO 200  f/16  1/100 @ 250mm...

ISO 200 f/5.6 1/1600 @ 250mm
ISO 200 f/5.6  1/1600 @ 250mm...

ISO 200 f/16 1/200 @ 163mm
ISO 200 f/16  1/200 @ 163mm...

Reply
Mar 27, 2012 15:58:36   #
ruffy50 Loc: Maine
 
Ilike those...GREAT SHOTS !!!!!

Reply
Mar 27, 2012 18:06:32   #
vlmar55
 
very clear and sharp. nice shots.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2012 18:09:11   #
Billybuzz Loc: Whiteford, MD
 
No critism. All very nice shots. Good work.

Reply
Mar 27, 2012 19:06:13   #
Dback4430 Loc: Lockport Il
 
Billybuzz wrote:
No critism. All very nice shots. Good work.

Thank you very much will you answer a question for me ? In these shots , would "L" lenses make a difference and what would it be ?

Reply
Mar 27, 2012 19:09:39   #
mollymolly Loc: In the heart of the Everglades.
 
These are all very nice.

Reply
Mar 28, 2012 09:44:25   #
Billybuzz Loc: Whiteford, MD
 
Dback4430 wrote:
Billybuzz wrote:
No critism. All very nice shots. Good work.

Thank you very much will you answer a question for me ? In these shots , would "L" lenses make a difference and what would it be ?


If I understand it correctly "L" lenses are top of the line "luxury" lenses manufactured by Canon. I don't know if they would have made any difference other than being able to shoot faster shutter speeds and the use of higher quality glass in the lens. Obviously the cost of these lenses is considerably higher.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.