Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Hasselblad DSLR
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 15, 2015 16:01:33   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
For those with severe GAS, Hasselblad is offering an FF 24MP DSLR with a 24 - 70 lens for only $4000. The price was formerly $12,000. About the same size as a Nikon. Tough looking!



Reply
Jun 15, 2015 16:07:20   #
Rich Maher Loc: Sonoma County, CA
 
Dear Santa,
Please.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 16:15:55   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
CatMarley wrote:
For those with severe GAS, Hasselblad is offering an FF 24MP DSLR with a 24 - 70 lens for only $4000. The price was formerly $12,000. About the same size as a Nikon. Tough looking!


Interesting.
According to DP review: A restyled Sony SLT-a99
http://www.hasselblad.com/dslr/hv

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2015 16:16:01   #
hlmichel Loc: New Hope, Minnesota
 
Well that is a nice-looking camera.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 16:41:10   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
Sony sells their camera and zeiss lens for $4K also (a $2K camera and a $2K lens) so it's a question of whether you want the Sony or Hassie logo.
GoofyNewfie wrote:
Interesting.
According to DP review: A restyled Sony SLT-a99
http://www.hasselblad.com/dslr/hv

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 16:44:33   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
Bobspez wrote:
Sony sells their camera and zeiss lens for $4K also (a $2K camera and a $2K lens) so it's a question of whether you want the Sony or Hassie logo.


$2k for a full-frame body and $2k for the lens is about right....actually less than my Nikon D800 and 24-70 cost.
For that price, the 'blad version would be great for an "image enthusiast"
They both look like a DSLR on anabolic steroids.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 17:36:50   #
CatMarley Loc: North Carolina
 
Bobspez wrote:
Sony sells their camera and zeiss lens for $4K also (a $2K camera and a $2K lens) so it's a question of whether you want the Sony or Hassie logo.


Are you kidding? Sony v Hassie? Since when has Sony had cachet?

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2015 17:51:22   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
Only important if you value cachet. I have always been a sort of anti-cachet person myself.
Bob
CatMarley wrote:
Are you kidding? Sony v Hassie? Since when has Sony had cachet?


:-D

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 18:22:50   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
CatMarley wrote:
For those with severe GAS, Hasselblad is offering an FF 24MP DSLR with a 24 - 70 lens for only $4000. The price was formerly $12,000. About the same size as a Nikon. Tough looking!


ONLY

Plus lenses

Guess I will stick with my Canons and Sigmas.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 18:38:48   #
boberic Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
 
CatMarley wrote:
Are you kidding? Sony v Hassie? Since when has Sony had cachet?


Cachet? Is it also a FF or is it a crop sensor. MP? cost? Is Cachet an independent company or just some name for another outfit. I think I heard a rumor that it will hgave 100mp and cost 2300 body only and will take either Canon or Nikon lenses.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 18:53:30   #
BebuLamar
 
CatMarley wrote:
Are you kidding? Sony v Hassie? Since when has Sony had cachet?


I think it's the Sony A99. I wouldn't be surprised if most of the camera is made by Sony.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2015 19:01:02   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
I remember when Pentax had a 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 film camera built just like a regular 35mm camera. I'm waiting for a medium format dslr built like a regular Nikon dslr.

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 22:30:08   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
SteveR wrote:
I remember when Pentax had a 2 1/4 x 2 1/4 film camera built just like a regular 35mm camera. I'm waiting for a medium format dslr built like a regular Nikon dslr.


The Pentax 6x7 (2 1/4 x 2 3/4) did look like a scaled up 35mm camera.
Mike Tyson and his big hands would have been right at home with it.
I had one for a while but did not find it very comfortable to use.
Here it is next to the 35mm Pentax K1000.
(cute new avitar photo, Steve)



Reply
Jun 15, 2015 23:20:58   #
SteveR Loc: Michigan
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
The Pentax 6x7 (2 1/4 x 2 3/4) did look like a scaled up 35mm camera.
Mike Tyson and his big hands would have been right at home with it.
I had one for a while but did not find it very comfortable to use.
Here it is next to the 35mm Pentax K1000.
(cute new avitar photo, Steve)


Here's one that might work a little better.

Fujica GW690
Fujica GW690...

Reply
Jun 15, 2015 23:45:58   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
SteveR wrote:
Here's one that might work a little better.

The bigger prototype of the Fuji X100!
No mirror slap either.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.