Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles

Gee! Obama hasn't opened his pietrap and neither have Sharpton, Jackson, or the other leading r****t h**e-mongers. I guess ONLY black l***s m****r to those r****ts and to the media.

==============================

THAT AWKWARD MOMENT WHEN: Cops Shoot White Thugs And No One Gets Mad Or Sets Town On Fire
Screen Shot 2015-05-18 at 9.53.04 AM

Posted on May 18, 2015

Why aren’t they sending the National Guard in? Because no one is setting Waco on fire and no one is r**ting about this.

A biker brawl in Waco, Texas, Sunday that left nine bikers dead and 18 injured is drawing the astonishing response from liberal media voices that the bikers are being treated differently from inner-city r****rs because they’re white.
Barely had the news gone national before race-obsessed New York Times columnist Charles Blow posted a Twitter question wondering whether the National Guard would be activated — like a gang fight is somehow the same as a mass disturbance aimed at mass destruction.
One tweeter summed it up: “That awkward moment when police shoot white thugs and no one gets mad and sets the town on fire.”
Waco cops, though, seem to know exactly what happened — even if it was extreme.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Don't understand your Awkward Moment issue.

180 mostly white guys--armed with guns, knives, brass knuckles, sticks, and anything else they could find-- practically announce their intentions, then began something that might be called a r**t or a battle, or maybe a biker's picnic, in a situation in which the concept of police using "excessive force" is indefinable and unimaginable.

This wasn't an unarmed black man purchasing a BB gun at Walmart, murdered within seconds of police arriving on the scene; it wasn't a 12 year old black kid playing by himself, then murdered within two seconds of the police arrival; it wasn't a mentally disturbed black man, ranting on a street corner, k**led within 15 seconds of police arriving on the scene; these all involve issues of both r****m and excessive force.

One hundred mostly white bikers intent upon k*****g each other by any means possible negates any idea of any use of "excessive force" by police, and further negates any possible charge of r****m; it is a wild story, but seems to be a perfecly appropriate and competent use of force by the police.

The assumption which the post seems to advance, that w****s are superior to b****s because they didn't r**t in this situation while b****s have r**ted in other situations, is a blatently dishonest and ignorant comparison, and proves to be uninteresting to UHH members who have declined to post in reply.

As an announced liberal on this site, I tip my hat to those police, who used justified and competent force in a wild and unprecedented situation.

This is exactly the professionalism our police are supposed to display, and they displayed it.

Shutterbugsailer Loc: Staten Island NY (AKA Cincinnati by the Sea)

Unlike a r**t, rape, robbery, or race h**e attack, the line between victim and perpetrator was as blurred. Both gangs showed up at that restaurant "armed for bear" and with the same evil intent in mind. The nine "victims" could just have easily been the "perps" and vice versa

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

I'm completely lost in your first sentence: "the line between victim and perpetrator was as blurred,' as 'a r**t, rape, robbery, or race h**e attack.' ????

"Both gangs showed up a that resaturant 'armed for bear,' and with the same evel intent in mind."

Absolutely.

"The nine "victims" could just have easily been the "perps" and vice versa[/quote]"

I don't think this is quite right. I think all were perps. If two guys start a bar fight (which seem to be what we are talking about) does one have to be the victim and the other the perp? I think they can both be perps, one perhaps more injured than the other.

If one of the two 'picked' the fight, forced the issue, bullied, then there might be a perp and a victim, but I don't think that is an automatic descripton.

I don't think you would disagree on this. But I fail to see the point you are trying to make.

The point of my original post was that there was no issue of police excessive force involved, and no racial issues.

The post I was referring to seemed to claim that w****s are superior to b****s because no civil r**t followed the shooting of 9 white guys, while civil r**ts have occurred by b****s when an unarmed black man was shot by a white policeman using excessive force.

And my reply is that the two are not comparable. There was no such thing as excessive force in the 'battle,' and no racial component, either.

If you disagree, please clarify.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

Are you taking English lessons from Dirtpusher?

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

quack, quack, quack....