Another question re: small cameras: Like many others I downsized a few years ago only to be dissatisfied with the smaller cameras because of lag time and just general speed compared to...

RJWagons Loc: Lake Ridge Virginia

Like many others I downsized a few years ago only to be dissatisfied with the smaller cameras because of lag time and just general speed compared to a DSLR. Several months ago I went back to heavier equipment (Canon 6D) which is working out great but now I want a small camera to stick in a bag when I'm not doing professional work. (I sell prints and greeting cards.)
Many of you speak so highly of the Canon SX50 and I was ready to buy one but then remembered a professional photographer who told me about the PowerShotG16 or PowerShotG15. Both the SX50 and the G15 are available in Canon's refurbished shop.
I've looked at the comparisons but wonder if any of you can comment on the G15. Thank you.

mickley Loc: Schenectady NY

May I suggest the Canon SL1? It's small and light, and uses your standard EF lenses.

RJWagons Loc: Lake Ridge Virginia

Thank you. I've looked at that but for this one, was hoping to find a really good quality one without extra lens. I forgot to mention that I also have the Canon T2i which is a great little camera but not as small as the two I mentioned.
Thank you again.

wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado

RJWagons wrote:

Thank you. I've looked at that but for this one, was hoping to find a really good quality one without extra lens. I forgot to mention that I also have the Canon T2i which is a great little camera but not as small as the two I mentioned.
Thank you again.

Unless you go with a "too" cheap point and shoot camera, most have very little shutter lag. My wife's older Olympus XZ-1 has almost no shutter lag. The Canon G series should have almost no shutter lag along with the other Canon you are considering. The G15 will probably be as good as the SX50 as far as shutter lag. I would look at the other features to decide which to buy.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

RJWagons wrote:

Like many others I downsized a few years ago only ... (show quote)

As I always say in cases like this, do comparisons and see what each has to offer. It's free!

http://camerasize.com/
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM
http://snapsort.com/compare
http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/cameras?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=mainmenu&utm_medium=text&ref=mainmenu

John N Loc: HP14 3QF Stokenchurch, UK

The G series are good. I have an old G7 and it's a trooper. Usually got it somewhere to hand. They also do RAW so if you are in to PP a good option.

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

RJWagons wrote:

Like many others I downsized a few years ago only ... (show quote)

The 6D has spoiled you for great IQ, so the next step is to try to duplicate that IQ in a smaller machine: The G15 is closer to that than the SX50, the G16 a little closer yet, but the right one for you is the G1X Mkii. It's an exceptional camera: great features, large sensor, great lens, up-to-date technology, and wonderful IQ. If you don't want to spend the $$, then the refurbed G15 certainly isn't bad, but the G7X should be considered as well.
Of them all, the G1X Mkii is probably the best shooter, but it's build quality might give it a little too much heft for your needs.

lukan Loc: Chicago, IL

mickley wrote:

May I suggest the Canon SL1? It's small and light, and uses your standard EF lenses.

^^^ Great choice! Awesome little shooter, feature-packed, great IQ. Canon refurb dep't = $309! :thumbup:

bobmcculloch Loc: NYC, NY

RJWagons wrote:

Like many others I downsized a few years ago only ... (show quote)

I have and use a G15 a lot, great camera, just did a christening yesterday as a guest, only looked quickly at the shots but they all look great, nice having a F1.8-f2.8 lens in church, did not need flash, could have used more zoom, if I'd been getting paid I'd have moved closer, more than enough for a guest, over all IMHO a great camera, Bob.

47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range

I have a G16 and the only real issue I have with it is the size of the sensor. It's a 1/1.7, step up to a Canon G1x and you have close to a APS-C sensor. It's a camera with a lot to like. You can also check the specs out and do comparisons with the links provided by Jerry. Best news is Canon's current refurb prices, which put the G1x at less than $295 and the G15 at less than $245. Also, don't ignore the S110, which can be had right now for $142. The Canon refurb store is really running some sweet specials right now.

RJWagons Loc: Lake Ridge Virginia

Thank you. I've already done some comparison studies; was hoping to find someone's personal experience or maybe even someone who has used both.

Apprieciate your help!

ole sarg Loc: south florida

The G1XMkii does not have an optical viewfinder. Also, it is rather large.
The G16 is a wonderful camera. This fall it will be replaced by the G17 and will have a larger 1 inch sensor. I would wait for that.

lukan wrote:

The 6D has spoiled you for great IQ, so the next s... (show quote)

47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range

My wife and I recently went to Costa Rica. We used both the SX50 and the G16. Both produced good quality images. The G16 was far better in low light scenarios. It's shape was also easier to manage. The build quality of the G16 is also better if not heavier than the SX50. The extended range of the SX50 was both good and bad. Shooting critters and other beasts, the long range was handy but tricky. We shot raw the entire trip mostly in aperture priority. No video. The G16 was in many ways easier to operate since you don't have to dig down into menus to make as many changes. Manual focus with the SX50 is a real PITA, but it isn't much easier with the G16. Those birds in trees among the branches type shots can really be a challenge. If I had to make a choice, I repeat what I did before, buy both! Lastly, the SX50 electronic viewer has much to be desired. The G16 has an optical view.

47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range

ole sarg wrote:

The G1XMkii does not have an optical viewfinder. Also, it is rather large.
The G16 is a wonderful camera. This fall it will be replaced by the G17 and will have a larger 1 inch sensor. I would wait for that.

Which is a good reason to consider the G1x refurb right now. Larger sensor.

RJWagons Loc: Lake Ridge Virginia

Wow! To the point and very helpful! Thank you.
Now - more selections to consider. This is great! I really appreicate all of the comments.