Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
My First Attempt Photographing Jupiter with Canon 60D
Mar 15, 2015 03:09:32   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
My first attempt photographing Jupiter at 7,680mm or 7,680/50 = 153X Zoom... more or less... unless my math is wrong...

Canon 60D = 1.6x
Kenko Pro 300 TC (2ea 2.0X = 4.0X)
Crop Factor 2.0X(+/-)

1.6x600mmx4x2 = 7,680mm
7,680mm/50mm(normal lens) = 153X
Jupiter Taken with Canon 60D + Tamron 150-600mm + 2ea 2x Kenko Pro TCs
Single shot - No stacking... I bet you knew that already!

P.S. I'll have to try with my Dynamax 8 telescope next time...



Jupiter Taken with Canon 60D + Tamron 150-600mm + 2ea 2x Kenko Pro TCs
Jupiter Taken with Canon 60D + Tamron 150-600mm + ...
(Download)

Jupiter Info at time of photographing
Jupiter Info at time of photographing...
(Download)

Reply
Mar 15, 2015 03:52:12   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Nice :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 15, 2015 11:18:14   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Nice :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Thanks dirtpusher... much appreciated...

Reply
 
 
Mar 16, 2015 07:04:40   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Bruce, Nice shot. Now you got me going. I have wanted to do this but have not started the research to find. Are you also shooting the Orion nebulas as well? Check the math, I think you may be half of what you are thinking of. Gary
brucew29 wrote:
My first attempt photographing Jupiter at 7,680mm or 7,680/50 = 153X Zoom... more or less... unless my math is wrong...

Canon 60D = 1.6x
Kenko Pro 300 TC (2ea 2.0X = 4.0X)
Crop Factor 2.0X(+/-)

1.6x600mmx4x2 = 7,680mm
7,680mm/50mm(normal lens) = 153X
Jupiter Taken with Canon 60D + Tamron 150-600mm + 2ea 2x Kenko Pro TCs
Single shot - No stacking... I bet you knew that already!

P.S. I'll have to try with my Dynamax 8 telescope next time...


My first attempt photographing Jupiter at 7,680mm ... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 16, 2015 08:35:02   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
gwong1 wrote:
Bruce, Nice shot. Now you got me going. I have wanted to do this but have not started the research to find. Are you also shooting the Orion nebulas as well? Check the math, I think you may be half of what you are thinking of. Gary

Good morning Gary if you are still in front of your computer... no I haven't tried the Orion Nebulae because I haven't looked for it yet... it has been difficult enough seeing the Moon from here lately because of the weather and too many trees... I checked and it is supposed to be located at approximately 177 degrees east of north and 45 degrees above the horizon at 7:30 PM on 03-16-2015 at my location. I belive that would be approximately 180 degrees east of north and 57 degrees above the horizon at 7:30 PM on 03-16-2015 from your location.

Where did I make a mistake in my math calcs on the Moon shot... I don't mind some help... :)

Reply
Mar 16, 2015 11:10:46   #
gwong1 Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Bruce,
I believe the focal distance is - 600*1.6*4=3840mm equiv.
Let me know if I am wrong. (Get some sleep!) Gary
brucew29 wrote:
Good morning Gary if you are still in front of your computer... no I haven't tried the Orion Nebulae because I haven't looked for it yet... it has been difficult enough seeing the Moon from here lately because of the weather and too many trees... I checked and it is supposed to be located at approximately 177 degrees east of north and 45 degrees above the horizon at 7:30 PM on 03-16-2015 at my location. I belive that would be approximately 180 degrees east of north and 57 degrees above the horizon at 7:30 PM on 03-16-2015 from your location.

Where did I make a mistake in my math calcs on the Moon shot... I don't mind some help... :)
Good morning Gary if you are still in front of you... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 16, 2015 13:23:00   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
gwong1 wrote:
Bruce,
I believe the focal distance is - 600*1.6*4=3840mm equiv.
Let me know if I am wrong. (Get some sleep!) Gary

Hi Gary....

There is also a "Print Crop Factor" that is calculated into the mix... by cropping in close enlarges the image... by enlarging the image creates a zoom effect... "Photofiltre" calculates the amount of crop and correlates it into an effective zoom factor and gives an equivalent comparison relative to a standard 35mm film camera... an effective focal length equivalency... what it would take to get the same picture area in a 35mm film area... so the computer cropped Moon image adds a 2X into the equation... therefore, 2 x 3,840mm = 7,680mm... 8-)

The total zoom factor is based upon a standard 50mm lens which is required to cover a 35mm camera format area...

Therefore,
7,680mm/50 = 153.6x total zoom factor...

Reply
 
 
Mar 16, 2015 14:20:19   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
brucew29 wrote:
My first attempt photographing Jupiter at 7,680mm or 7,680/50 = 153X Zoom... more or less... unless my math is wrong...

Canon 60D = 1.6x
Kenko Pro 300 TC (2ea 2.0X = 4.0X)
Crop Factor 2.0X(+/-)

1.6x600mmx4x2 = 7,680mm
7,680mm/50mm(normal lens) = 153X
Jupiter Taken with Canon 60D + Tamron 150-600mm + 2ea 2x Kenko Pro TCs
Single shot - No stacking... I bet you knew that already!

P.S. I'll have to try with my Dynamax 8 telescope next time...


My first attempt photographing Jupiter at 7,680mm ... (show quote)


Real nice Bruce, can't wait to see your shots with the 8"
Craig

Reply
Mar 16, 2015 21:34:49   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
CraigFair wrote:
Real nice Bruce, can't wait to see your shots with the 8"
Craig

Thanks Craig... I got spoiled carrying my camera setup out instead of my Dynamax 8 which weighs about 4 or 5 times as much as my camera rig...

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 12:59:27   #
brucew29 Loc: Cincinnati, Ohio
 
Thanks again to all that have commented on my photo...

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.