Canon 5DS and 5DS R Shots: Check out some shots posted with the newest Canon 5DS and S R. http://www.georgeleppimages.com/new-page-2 Chris...

Chris F. Loc: San Francisco

Check out some shots posted with the newest Canon 5DS and S R.

http://www.georgeleppimages.com/new-page-2

Chris

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

Chris F. wrote:

Check out some shots posted with the newest Canon 5DS and S R.

http://www.georgeleppimages.com/new-page-2

Chris

Nice, but I'm not impressed by sample images. They always look good.

oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA

jerryc41 wrote:

Nice, but I'm not impressed by sample images. They always look good.

they are supposed to be the best of the best, that is what makes them useful.

SBW

jerryc41 wrote:

Nice, but I'm not impressed by sample images. They always look good.

Ho Hum. What a rude remark.

SBW

Chris F. wrote:

Check out some shots posted with the newest Canon 5DS and S R.

http://www.georgeleppimages.com/new-page-2

Chris

Nice! Great images. Thanks. I want one. Maybe two, one of each!

Chris F. Loc: San Francisco

I was just reading a post yesterday on the hog, that if you get the 5DS R, the filter will be able to be turned off so it will behave like the 5DS. It's the more expensive one with a $200 premium. I think that would be the way to go though, after dishing out that much, what's another $200!

Chris

SBW wrote:

Nice! Great images. Thanks. I want one. Maybe two, one of each!

SBW

Chris F. wrote:

I was just reading a post yesterday on the hog, that if you get the 5DS R, the filter will be able to be turned off so it will behave like the 5DS. It's the more expensive one with a $200 premium. I think that would be the way to go though, after dishing out that much, what's another $200!

Chris

It sure appears that Canon has raised the bar once again. It will be interesting to see how long it holds it's release price point. A couple months back there was a rumor that Sony was manufacturing the sensor to the 5Ds but I think that has turned out to not be true.

Chris F. Loc: San Francisco

Oops! Just read now here on another thread that the camera filtering system is not switchable.

Chris

Chris F. wrote:

I was just reading a post yesterday on the hog, that if you get the 5DS R, the filter will be able to be turned off so it will behave like the 5DS. It's the more expensive one with a $200 premium. I think that would be the way to go though, after dishing out that much, what's another $200!

Chris

SBW

Chris F. wrote:

Oops! Just read now here on another thread that the camera filtering system is not switchable.

Chris

I guess that makes sense if you think about it. They would not have two different models at two different price points if it was switchable. Still, I want one.

The expense will be more than just the camera. Most any home PC will have to be either upgraded or replaced to handle the file size it will produce.

Chris F. Loc: San Francisco

Me too, I think!

Chris

SBW wrote:

I guess that makes sense if you think about it. They would not have two different models at two different price points if it was switchable. Still, I want one.

The expense will be more than just the camera. Most any home PC will have to be either upgraded or replaced to handle the file size it will produce.

Jer Loc: Mesa, Arizona

I agree.Sample photos are always great. The question is how well it works in real life situations. Also things like additional costs like do you also need to upgrade lens.

jerryc41 wrote:

Nice, but I'm not impressed by sample images. They always look good.

SBW

Jer wrote:

I agree.Sample photos are always great. The question is how well it works in real life situations. Also things like additional costs like do you also need to upgrade lens.

So what should they do? When they are testing new photo equipment they should take and publish sample photos that are not so great? Why not publish the best photos? Why publish something mediocre? What would that accomplish?

Jer Loc: Mesa, Arizona

I agree but you don't solely judge by sample shots.

SBW wrote:

So what should they do? When they are testing new photo equipment they should take and publish sample photos that are not so great? Why not publish the best photos? Why publish something mediocre? What would that accomplish?

SBW

Jer wrote:

I agree but you don't solely judge by sample shots.

You are absolutely right. I just do not understand why some fault seeing the best a camera can do. It seems to me that would be an inspiration for a budding or an experienced photographer. But we all know that to a large degree it is not the camera making the photo exceptional.