Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
memory card
Mar 12, 2015 17:41:15   #
custodian Loc: New York
 
Is this a good deal? Scandisk Extreme Pro 64 gb UHS-1 for $99 or a Extreme Pro Plus 64 SDXC UHS-3 for $199.99 Is it better to have a class 10? I have a Nikon d5200

Reply
Mar 12, 2015 17:51:26   #
Jahawk Loc: Rhode Island
 
custodian wrote:
Is this a good deal? Scandisk Extreme Pro 64 gb UHS-1 for $99 or a Extreme Pro Plus 64 SDXC UHS-3 for $199.99 Is it better to have a class 10? I have a Nikon d5200


check this out
http://www.cameramemoryspeed.com/

Reply
Mar 12, 2015 22:13:26   #
Mr PC Loc: Austin, TX
 
I also have a D5200 and have been using a Sony 64GB Class 10 40MB/s SDXC1 card for about a year and a half. It was probably $65 at the time. It is not the bottleneck, the camera's buffer is the limitation on writing continuous shots while doing action photos. I shoot strictly RAW, so I'm lucky to get more than 2 seconds of 5 frames a second before buffering slows me down. The new D7200 might be better able to take advantage of an extreme card like you are considering, but I think most any good Class 10 will serve you well on a D5200. My 2 cents. Hope this helps.

Reply
 
 
Mar 13, 2015 15:29:54   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
This was a very good source. Found actual 'write' test data for various cards in the Sony a6000. First impression, SD card labeling for MB/s do not even come close to test 'write' speeds. There needs to be consumer pressure to get accurate speed markers on the labels.

Reply
Mar 13, 2015 15:35:10   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
Forgot to mention that price is not an indicator, either.

Reply
Mar 13, 2015 20:05:43   #
custodian Loc: New York
 
thank you the onfo is helpful!

Reply
Mar 14, 2015 13:53:42   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
custodian wrote:
Is this a good deal? Scandisk Extreme Pro 64 gb UHS-1 for $99 or a Extreme Pro Plus 64 SDXC UHS-3 for $199.99 Is it better to have a class 10? I have a Nikon d5200


I have a Sandisk Extreme 32GB UHS-1 that I bought for $17.99 at Costco around Christmas time. That would be $36 for two of them = 64GB. It far exceeds Class 10 minimum speed of 30MB/s because it's rated at 80MB/s. I'd say $99 for a 64GB single card is quite high actually. Either one that you listed is overkill for a dSLR anyway and even overkill for 1080p video. A faster card doesn't mean the camera itself can read and write faster. It has a limit as to how fast its electronics works.

If you're into cars you might remember the days when guys would put (3) 2-barrel carburetors or (2) huge 4-barrels on a mediocre stock engine and it did no good because the engine couldn't drink that much air and fuel and was actually drowning. Same is true of sticking a super high speed card into a dSLR.

When exceeding the speed of the camera itself, you're throwing money down a rat hole if you're buying absurdly faster and faster cards - unless you plan on getting a newer future camera model that can take advantage of it later, maybe for shooting 48MP RAW files or 4K video.

In the days of Class 2, Class 4, Class 6, and Class 10, it was logical to buy faster than you need but the race for card speeds seems to have come to a saturation point with current camera technology. I don't believe a D5200 (actually considered old technology at this point) can take advantage of card speeds as high as a UHS-1.

Reply
 
 
Mar 14, 2015 15:06:49   #
JimH123 Loc: Morgan Hill, CA
 
marcomarks wrote:
I have a Sandisk Extreme 32GB UHS-1 that I bought for $17.99 at Costco around Christmas time. That would be $36 for two of them = 64GB. It far exceeds Class 10 minimum speed of 30MB/s because it's rated at 80MB/s. I'd say $99 for a 64GB single card is quite high actually. Either one that you listed is overkill for a dSLR anyway and even overkill for 1080p video. A faster card doesn't mean the camera itself can read and write faster. It has a limit as to how fast its electronics works.

If you're into cars you might remember the days when guys would put (3) 2-barrel carburetors or (2) huge 4-barrels on a mediocre stock engine and it did no good because the engine couldn't drink that much air and fuel and was actually drowning. Same is true of sticking a super high speed card into a dSLR.

When exceeding the speed of the camera itself, you're throwing money down a rat hole if you're buying absurdly faster and faster cards - unless you plan on getting a newer future camera model that can take advantage of it later, maybe for shooting 48MP RAW files or 4K video.

In the days of Class 2, Class 4, Class 6, and Class 10, it was logical to buy faster than you need but the race for card speeds seems to have come to a saturation point with current camera technology. I don't believe a D5200 (actually considered old technology at this point) can take advantage of card speeds as high as a UHS-1.
I have a Sandisk Extreme 32GB UHS-1 that I bought ... (show quote)


I also bought some of those SanDisk cards at Costco about that time. And I can take a picture and watch how long the busy light is lit on the camera and then use some other card which is supposed to be the same speed, and notice how much longer it takes for the busy light to go out. They are not anywhere near equal.

Reply
Mar 14, 2015 16:09:27   #
custodian Loc: New York
 
So just go with the 32GB uhs-1 and ill have plenty of space for pictures and video

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.