prettynice wrote:
What tripod would you recommend with the gimbal head and the 150600 lens?
Lot's of advice, most of it words that have been read and repeated by others.
Read the three parts to this:
http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/Be-a-Gear-Expert/Choosing-a-Tripod/Part-1-Understanding-Load-Ratings.htmlAnd Page 14 of the attached catalog (see download link below)
to gain some knowledge and clarity about what tripod might be suitable and what it can cost and why.
You will immediately understand that load capacity, tripod weight, the tripod that Joe Hedgehog uses and loves, and lots of other advice I've seen - are all misguided attempts to help you, mostly with bad information. The end result is that by following such advice, you will be at least one or more tripods before you get the one you really need. The 150-600 absolutely requires a rigid, high level tripod. There are many fine less expensive ones, but most will leave you either underwhelmed or just plain frustrated. If need to or want to learn from your own mistakes. no one can stop you. Or you can read and learn and become acquainted with what you really need, and maybe buy just one more tripod and get it right in one shot.
If you are getting light (and you should), you should be looking at a carbon fiber tripod with a 37mm or larger top tube diameter. Without a head and no extendable center column it will weigh between 3.6 and 5 lbs, depending on the number of leg sections. The brand is less important, since there are only a few that make such a tripod. To my knowledge, the least expensive that meets this criteria might be the Feisol 3472 or 3372 - from experience I can tell you it is more rigid than a Gitzo Series 3 (which is expected, since it only has a 28mm top tube), and not quite as rigid as a Series 5 with its 39mm top tube.
For me the choice was a good compromise. To support a 600mm lens I needed a Gitzo series 5 carbon, or the equivalent RRS. But my budget was considerably more modest. That is how I first came across Feisol 7 yrs ago. I took a chance, returned the Gitzo Series 3 carbon I had purchased just a month earlier, and ordered a 3472 - and never looked back. It has 4 leg sections and weighs slightly over 3.5 lbs, and has a 37mm top tube, and 90% of the time it is dead stable, regardless of whether I use the 600 or a 150 macro - I get consistent, sharp results. I ordered mine directly from
www.feisol.com and it took a week to get. I think I paid $550 in 2008. I take it backpacking and on day hikes - and it solves most of my needs. I suppose I could get a lighter duty tripod for landscape work, (no long lens or macro) and it would be smaller and lighter- but I have other better things to spend my money on, a second pod would be a bit of a luxury.
I am not implying that you need to spend $2000 on a tripod and head, but I am saying that there are some reasonable alternatives to that if you are willing to deal with a small amount of compromise - but the concept is the same - performance, not stats, will determine how happy you will be with your purchase. And top tube diameter is the best predictor of performance.