Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
The Original Photo and The Cropped Version
Feb 17, 2015 14:08:23 #
I like the cropped version better....but that's just me.
Feb 17, 2015 14:10:51 #
ducwic wrote:
I like the cropped version better....but that's just me.
sorry but I like the original...viewers option.... :) :)
Feb 17, 2015 14:29:01 #
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Feb 17, 2015 15:03:26 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
The original is by far the better of the two... It shows what is much more to the story of wildlife...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
Feb 17, 2015 15:03:26 #
donrent
Loc: Punta Gorda , Fl
The original is by far the better of the two... It shows what is much more to the story of wildlife...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
Feb 17, 2015 16:02:01 #
When shooting wildlife one should include their habitat as judges and environmentalists will mark you down if you don't.
Having said that - you were photographing the birds so why did you not fill the frame with them and not the uninteresting tree and yards of water?.....There should have been a better composition possible.
Your crop is a tad tight. The geese on the right need a little more space to 'look into'. Perhaps including the far right cropped out one would have balanced the picture by having the two outsiders looking in.
I think you could darken the image slightly and get more definition into the snow.
Its not up to me to like.....so I hope my criticism helps you get an image that you like (better)
Have fun and keep shooting
Having said that - you were photographing the birds so why did you not fill the frame with them and not the uninteresting tree and yards of water?.....There should have been a better composition possible.
Your crop is a tad tight. The geese on the right need a little more space to 'look into'. Perhaps including the far right cropped out one would have balanced the picture by having the two outsiders looking in.
I think you could darken the image slightly and get more definition into the snow.
Its not up to me to like.....so I hope my criticism helps you get an image that you like (better)
Have fun and keep shooting
Feb 17, 2015 17:52:08 #
Tom DePuy wrote:
sorry but I like the original...viewers option.... :) :)
Tom DePuy, thanks for stopping by and commenting.
Feb 17, 2015 17:53:22 #
ebbote wrote:
I too like the original Ducwic, even that the cropped one is very good.
ebbote, thanks for stopping by and commenting.
Feb 17, 2015 17:54:20 #
donrent wrote:
The original is by far the better of the two... It shows what is much more to the story of wildlife...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
If any cropping is done , then maybe chop of about 1/3 or so of the bottom water area...
donrent, thanks for stopping by and commenting.
Feb 17, 2015 18:16:17 #
G Brown wrote:
When shooting wildlife one should include their ha... (show quote)
G Brown, interesting dissection of the photos. Thank you, but I'm sticking with the crop. This is what I would have captured
if I had longer glass. But I had a 18-135mm lens and shot the original photo at 135mm. The eye of the beholder is still king, or should I say queen!!
Feb 18, 2015 06:59:22 #
I would have gone 1/3 water, 1/3 ducks and snow and 1/3 trees. Otherwise, the original would do.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Feb 18, 2015 11:31:44 #
Snap Shot wrote:
I would have gone 1/3 water, 1/3 ducks and snow and 1/3 trees. Otherwise, the original would do.
agree; because with that, you do get their environment, which is both land and water.
Feb 18, 2015 11:38:41 #
ducwic wrote:
I like the cropped version better....but that's just me.
I do also.
Feb 18, 2015 12:39:48 #
Snap Shot wrote:
I would have gone 1/3 water, 1/3 ducks and snow and 1/3 trees. Otherwise, the original would do.
Thanks for your comments. I tried it . Too busy
Still like my cropped version.
Feb 18, 2015 12:41:50 #
amyinsparta wrote:
agree; because with that, you do get their environment, which is both land and water.
Thanks for your comments. I tried it . Too busy
Still like my cropped version.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.