I know, I know
Mar 3, 2012 11:27:57 #
Mar 3, 2012 11:39:37 #
Mar 3, 2012 12:39:21 #
Maybe it's just me, but I think SC should highlight the important part of the photo. That's why ads that use this technique color the products they are selling.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
Mar 3, 2012 13:56:39 #
snowbear wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I think SC should highlight the important part of the photo. That's why ads that use this technique color the products they are selling.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
It was to her
Mar 3, 2012 14:00:05 #
Mar 3, 2012 14:02:22 #
i enjoy selective color also. if you follow her line of sight you come to the ball in a vibrant red color. wouldn't change a thing.
Mar 3, 2012 14:04:34 #
snowbear wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I think SC should highlight the important part of the photo. That's why ads that use this technique color the products they are selling.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
ditto, think some red in the shirt might pull the eye back to the child????
Mar 3, 2012 14:07:08 #
Bunny-Jean wrote:
ditto, think some red in the shirt might pull the eye back to the child????
snowbear wrote:
Maybe it's just me, but I think SC should highlight the important part of the photo. That's why ads that use this technique color the products they are selling.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
The eye is certainly drawn to the ball, but in doing so, attention is not on the child. IMO, the ball has become more important.
ditto, think some red in the shirt might pull the eye back to the child????
I agree, but I did this back when all I had to work with was Picasa, and it limits you with what you can select
Mar 3, 2012 14:08:02 #
Mar 3, 2012 14:24:17 #
Grampa Bob wrote:
How about this one
Not bad, Flag is the focus, but my eye did move back and forth across the line of guys...is that your intent????? Have not done much with selective coloring...so don't just go by my thoughts.......
Mar 3, 2012 14:29:46 #
Bunny-Jean wrote:
Not bad, Flag is the focus, but my eye did move back and forth across the line of guys...is that your intent????? Have not done much with selective coloring...so don't just go by my thoughts.......
Grampa Bob wrote:
How about this one
Not bad, Flag is the focus, but my eye did move back and forth across the line of guys...is that your intent????? Have not done much with selective coloring...so don't just go by my thoughts.......
No intent, just messin around
Mar 4, 2012 07:15:19 #
Mar 4, 2012 08:58:03 #
Mar 4, 2012 09:09:51 #
I really like them,agree with sinatraman and Bunny-Jean as to where my eyes went../I might crop a little of the kitchen floor.I love the photo choices for selective color.Jen
Mar 4, 2012 09:13:12 #
I love them both ... with just the ball red in the first one there is no doubt where the child is looking and why ...
the flag in the second one shows what is most important to them .. well done on both !
the flag in the second one shows what is most important to them .. well done on both !
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.