How v******ted kids can infect, endanger, k**l non-v******ted
Feb 9, 2015 18:40:30 #
Feb 9, 2015 21:51:13 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/how-v******ted-kids-infect-non-v******ted
Just like the flu v*****e can spread the flu...
Feb 9, 2015 23:06:56 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
RixPix wrote:
Just like the flu v*****e can spread the flu...
"Spread" may not be the punctiliously precise verb but the v*****e can increase likelihood of the flu because the various toxins (mercury, others) depress the body's immune function for a while. So in a way the flu v*****e can "cause" flu.
Feb 10, 2015 10:05:46 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
"Spread" may not be the punctiliously precise verb but the v*****e can increase likelihood of the flu because the various toxins (mercury, others) depress the body's immune function for a while. So in a way the flu v*****e can "cause" flu.
The v*****e does not CAUSE Flu.
Your i****e s****m hasn't built up enough to prevent getting it, maybe.
Saying it CAUSES the Flu is entirely misleading.....and inaccurate.
It is my understanding the Flu v*****es use dead v***s.
Is this NOT the case?
Feb 10, 2015 13:08:50 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter
Loc: Los Angeles
chrisscholbe wrote:
...
It is my understanding the Flu v*****es use dead v***s.
Is this NOT the case?
It is my understanding the Flu v*****es use dead v***s.
Is this NOT the case?
You miss the point. People who get the flu "because" of the shot do not get it directly from the shot. What happens is that the various toxins in the shot, including the Mercury, weaken the body's i****e s****m, leaving it unable to resist exposure to the flu.
You also ignore the salient fact that even the CDC is only claiming (with dubious "evidence") about 25% "effectiveness" for the flu shot. And that is only in the most healthy population. Which is better able to resist the flu anyhow, so it is incorrect to credit the shot for protecting them.
The CDC has been involved in many scandals relating to its close relationship to the medical-drug industry. The most quoted spokesman for the "benefits" of v******tion is on the payroll of a drug company. You would do well to be dubious about claims coming from the medical establishment.
Feb 10, 2015 14:07:47 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
You miss the point. People who get the flu "because" of the shot do not get it directly from the shot. What happens is that the various toxins in the shot, including the Mercury, weaken the body's i****e s****m, leaving it unable to resist exposure to the flu.
Are you suggesting that the number of times this happens is so significant that people shouldn't get v******ted?
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
You also ignore the salient fact that even the CDC is only claiming (with dubious "evidence") about 25% "effectiveness" for the flu shot. And that is only in the most healthy population. Which is better able to resist the flu anyhow, so it is incorrect to credit the shot for protecting them.
Didn't ignore it.
It's a know fact.
You take your best guess based on what you know and sometimes you get it right and sometime you don't.
This is NOT an argument to not get v******ted.
25% is much better than 0%.
Feb 10, 2015 14:22:37 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
YOU ARE ABSOUTELY RIGHT!-
Therefore they should not mix with my v******ted and healthy children! Keep them home where they will be safe!!!
In all but one VERY SPECIAL type of flu v*****e, there is NO MERCURY IN CHILDREN'S V*****ES!
A six ounce serving of light tuna contains about the same amount of mercury as one adult flu shot.. are you suggesting that eating Tuna gives you flu?
Funny thing, I know of no child who has had ANY complications, and no Child that has had any of these diseases... but I knew the ROI was better if they had them, because i took the time to research into how they work... so mine are inoculated- as well as my animals- who are also healthy. So if i was a betting man, I'd bet against you... and Vegas odds will be on my side about 100,000 to 1.
Therefore they should not mix with my v******ted and healthy children! Keep them home where they will be safe!!!
In all but one VERY SPECIAL type of flu v*****e, there is NO MERCURY IN CHILDREN'S V*****ES!
A six ounce serving of light tuna contains about the same amount of mercury as one adult flu shot.. are you suggesting that eating Tuna gives you flu?
Funny thing, I know of no child who has had ANY complications, and no Child that has had any of these diseases... but I knew the ROI was better if they had them, because i took the time to research into how they work... so mine are inoculated- as well as my animals- who are also healthy. So if i was a betting man, I'd bet against you... and Vegas odds will be on my side about 100,000 to 1.
Feb 10, 2015 17:06:24 #
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
"Spread" may not be the punctiliously precise verb but the v*****e can increase likelihood of the flu because the various toxins (mercury, others) depress the body's immune function for a while. So in a way the flu v*****e can "cause" flu.
The current flu v*****e pr********ns do not contain mercury, and looking over the the list of ingredients at the CDC web site, I see no immunosuppressants. There are several immunostimulators in the various pr********ns, and many neutral components, but no suppressors of immune function. Nice try, but no conspiracy award for you this time.
Feb 15, 2015 22:18:29 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.