Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Porthcurno Beach at dawn
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Feb 9, 2015 15:24:50   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!

BTW, please have a look at the download, thanks.


(Download)

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:37:19   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!


Just beautiful. Can I ask which lens you used for this shot?

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:39:52   #
photophile Loc: Lakewood, Ohio, USA
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!


I love the lighting throughout this lovely scene. :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2015 15:41:00   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Here's another one of this beautiful beach. My only reservation about this shot is not having an "anchor" on the right - there was a small amount of headland but unfortunately this got "lost" when I levelled the photo. Note to self - make sure the camera is level!!!

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:43:38   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
Just beautiful. Can I ask which lens you used for this shot?


Many thanks for looking and I'm really pleased you like it. The lens is a Canon 16-35 f2.8 at 17mm, ISO 100 and 1/13th of a second. Lens was mounted on a Canon 5D III. I know you didn't ask for the extra details but just thought you may be interested.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 15:47:26   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
Many thanks for looking and I'm really pleased you like it. The lens is a Canon 16-35 f2.8 at 17mm, ISO 100 and 1/13th of a second. Lens was mounted on a Canon 5D III. I know you didn't ask for the extra details but just thought you may be interested.


thank you, yes. I have the 7DM2 and the first L lens I got is the new 100-400 L II. However, like you, I live on the coast and my next purchase is going to be a wide angle. This is one I was considering. thank you. I like all your photographs, but find this one outstanding.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:03:32   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
photophile wrote:
I love the lighting throughout this lovely scene. :thumbup:


Thank you Karin, always love to hear from you and you're always complimentary.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2015 16:06:24   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
thank you, yes. I have the 7DM2 and the first L lens I got is the new 100-400 L II. However, like you, I live on the coast and my next purchase is going to be a wide angle. This is one I was considering. thank you. I like all your photographs, but find this one outstanding.


If you have the 7DM2 then you'll need the Canon 10-22 (or equivalent) for a similar perspective.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:11:45   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
If you have the 7DM2 then you'll need the Canon 10-22 (or equivalent) for a similar perspective.


Yes and now they just announced the 11-24 but it's an f4. But it would be in the ball park and I am planning to get a FF before the year is out. So many decisions, so few $$$'s. ;)

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:23:43   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
cmc65 wrote:
Yes and now they just announced the 11-24 but it's an f4. But it would be in the ball park and I am planning to get a FF before the year is out. So many decisions, so few $$$'s. ;)


If you're after a landscape lens then I wouldn't be put off just because the 11-24 is f4. If on the other hand you're going to get yourself a full-frame camera then the 16-35 f2.8 is a fabulous lens.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:28:23   #
cmc65
 
Luggerbugs wrote:
If you're after a landscape lens then I wouldn't be put off just because the 11-24 is f4. If on the other hand you're going to get yourself a full-frame camera then the 16-35 f2.8 is a fabulous lens.


Thank you for the feedback. I make my best decisions by looking at other people's photography. Thank you for sharing yours.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2015 16:36:24   #
Bob Yankle Loc: Burlington, NC
 
You can use content-aware fill when leveling photos to that you never lose any pixels Luggerbugs. I use it quite often.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:40:33   #
Big Stopper Loc: London
 
Bob Yankle wrote:
You can use content-aware fill when leveling photos to that you never lose any pixels Luggerbugs. I use it quite often.


Thanks Bob, I didn't know about that so will check it out. It's good to learn new things.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:54:45   #
jederick Loc: Northern Utah
 
Love your seascapes and this one is magnificant! :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 16:59:57   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Another stunning wide-angle capture. Love it!

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.