Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Too Bright or just right?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 8, 2015 17:05:16   #
Gdelvecc Loc: Dallas, TX
 
Whats the verdict. Please be critical!!


(Download)

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 17:40:51   #
geclevel Loc: Springville, Utah
 
To me the lighting looks odd. The dog is highly illuminated on one side and the models hair is unevenly illuminated on the opposite side. Almost looks like a spotlight on the models hair.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 17:41:31   #
traveler90712 Loc: Lake Worth, Fl.
 
:idea: If you take the Maltese out of the picture and send the pup to me, the picture will be just right! :thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2015 18:35:20   #
SonyA580 Loc: FL in the winter & MN in the summer
 
On my monitor her skin tones look too red. The lighting is a little confusing but I think it could be worked out in post-processing.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 19:43:39   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
I think you over-sharpened the image.

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 20:25:39   #
selig1656 Loc: Bel Air , Md
 
Too much light from the left .

Reply
Feb 8, 2015 22:27:31   #
Gdelvecc Loc: Dallas, TX
 
Is this better??? No Hair Light... No side Lights

Guess more is not better...
Guess more is not better......
(Download)

Reply
 
 
Feb 8, 2015 22:30:30   #
traveler90712 Loc: Lake Worth, Fl.
 
Gdelvecc wrote:
Is this better??? No Hair Light... No side Lights


Nice!

But I don't have the puppy! :-)

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 00:43:17   #
AdamK Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
Gdelvecc wrote:
Is this better??? No Hair Light... No side Lights


I think #2 is much more pleasing. The lighting looks more normal, the skin tone looks normal, it does not look over-processed. I might remove that catch low in her left eye, or subdue it a little.

The lighting on the first photo is "too much" and from too many different directions. Also, it looks over processed - her skin looks grainy in an unpleasant way.

I'll submit straight away that I'm the world's worst portrait photog, so take my feedback with a grain of salt. #2 would be a portrait that I'd be very proud of had I been the one to take it.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 05:42:12   #
avemal Loc: BALTIMORE
 
Just beauitiful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

:wink:

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 05:51:31   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Topaz Detail would bring out the detail in the dog based on micro/small contrast... then mask out the effect on the woman to allow portrait like smoothness. Best of all worlds as the saying goes.

Reply
 
 
Feb 9, 2015 06:47:23   #
stephenlouis Loc: Florida
 
The picture looks just great the way it is. Nice portrait.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 07:35:16   #
Madman Loc: Gulf Coast, Florida USA
 
Just a little, probably fixable. Also, if, possible, I would give her back the top of her head and her elbow. You might also consider removing the brown spots from her wrist.

Nice portrait.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 09:22:48   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
The first one is over sharpened, the second one, get rid of
the white background, otherwise both are good photos.

Reply
Feb 9, 2015 09:26:59   #
Picdude Loc: Ohio
 
I like the concept of the first portrait, but would definitely tone down the exposure a few clicks. There are places in the dog's hair that appear to be blown out. I agree with Rook that it looks a bit over sharpened; possibly to compensate for the exposure? I would say the image warrants another try.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.