ISO
Feb 7, 2015 20:05:22 #
Feb 7, 2015 20:13:15 #
I do not have one but I am curious what ISO has to do with the lens. Is it that I am not familiar with Canon products? Is it a Canon lens designation?
Dennis
Dennis
Feb 7, 2015 20:14:46 #
wrightwrjr
Loc: Paducah, KY
dennis2146 wrote:
I do not have one but I am curious what ISO has to do with the lens. Is it that I am not familiar with Canon products? Is it a Canon lens designation?
Dennis
Dennis
ISO = In Search Of.....nothing to do with the lens.
Feb 7, 2015 20:23:03 #
wrightwrjr wrote:
ISO = In Search Of.....nothing to do with the lens.
AHHH yes, you must remember the generation you're working with....... :-D
Feb 7, 2015 20:25:30 #
wrightwrjr wrote:
ISO = In Search Of.....nothing to do with the lens.
OK. I guess I can see that, kind of, maybe. Good luck finding one.
Dennis
Feb 7, 2015 21:11:40 #
wrightwrjr wrote:
ISO Canon EF 100L 2.8 Macro IS USM. Anyone have one they want to sell?
There is a member on here who has a store, look him up he might have what you are looking for. MT Shooter.
Feb 7, 2015 21:18:42 #
wrightwrjr wrote:
ISO Canon EF 100L 2.8 Macro IS USM. Anyone have one they want to sell?
Have you checked KEH? They sell lots of used equipment at fair prices.
Dennis
Feb 8, 2015 07:48:39 #
Feb 8, 2015 08:57:10 #
Feb 8, 2015 10:24:44 #
Michael Hartley wrote:
Some use, WTB - Want To Buy
And others just come out and say it....Wanted.
Feb 8, 2015 10:37:46 #
dennis2146 wrote:
I do not have one but I am curious what ISO has to do with the lens. Is it that I am not familiar with Canon products? Is it a Canon lens designation?
Dennis
Dennis
In search of!
Feb 8, 2015 11:28:04 #
warrior wrote:
In search of!
Yes, warrior, I have it now. Thanks. I do think writing ISO on a photographic forum and having it mean other than the normal ISO/ASA is beyond my thinking but to each his own. I think most of us would have written, Wanted or Want to Buy...
The problem with using abbreviations is many people have no idea what you are talking about. Many people on the forum use them and I would guess just as many scratch their head and wonder WTF is he talking about.
Other than my first sentence none of this is meant for you personally. Just venting for the rest of us and no offense meant to anyone.
Have a great day sir.
Dennis
Feb 8, 2015 12:43:50 #
wrightwrjr
Loc: Paducah, KY
dennis2146 wrote:
Yes, warrior, I have it now. Thanks. I do think ... (show quote)
You know Dennis, it really doesn't matter what you think. It seems that YOU were the only person here wondering WTF I was talking about. You don't have what I want anyway, so I really don't even know why you entered the conversation.
Feb 8, 2015 12:48:13 #
wrightwrjr
Loc: Paducah, KY
Jack47 wrote:
And others just come out and say it....Wanted.
And others don't.
Feb 8, 2015 13:00:18 #
wrightwrjr wrote:
You know Dennis, it really doesn't matter what you think. It seems that YOU were the only person here wondering WTF I was talking about. You don't have what I want anyway, so I really don't even know why you entered the conversation.
No need to be offended. I asked because I was curious about possible Canon lens markings and also because many people here on the forum are new and/or have no experience with cameras. I wondered what ISO had to do with lens markings. Simple as that and I do have a right to comment.
Are you going to tell me you know every abbreviation that anyone might use? Really??? Most people will tell you that abbreviations are often misused or not understood by everyone.
Dennis
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.