EXPOSED - The Politics Behind The Biggest S**m On Earth, G****L W*****G !! (Page 5): Did you read any of the posts? I have already covered Archaeopteryx, which has been discredited as...

Steven Seward Loc: Cleveland, Ohio

silver wrote:

You are quite mistaken, every life form living today is a t***sitional form. And how about Archaeopteryx? This was a feathers small dinosaur universally considered to be the first bird.

Did you read any of the posts? I have already covered Archaeopteryx, which has been discredited as a h**x. Here is a link one more time: http://tccsa.tc/articles/h**x.html

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

your refusal to believe does not naked science, there are no t***sitional forms alive now or in the fossil record it is not science it is wishful thinking. sorry but you are wrong there is no intermediate t***sitional forms in the fossil record or alive today there absolutely none.

I guess that archaeopteryx is not real according to you. Commonly recognized by rational people as the first bird.

nakkh Loc: San Mateo, Ca

You are a tiny minority. Think what you want.

Racmanaz wrote:

your refusal to believe does not naked science, there are no t***sitional forms alive now or in the fossil record it is not science it is wishful thinking. sorry but you are wrong there is no intermediate t***sitional forms in the fossil record or alive today there absolutely none.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Archaeopteryx is No T***sitional Form:

http://www.rae.org/pdf/flight.pdf

15: Modern birds have been found in the same strata. Bones of modern birds have been found in the same type of rock stratathe Jurassicin which Archaeopteryx was found. (They have been found in eastern Colorado.) According to evolutionary theory, this cannot be; for millions of years ought to be required for Archaeopteryx to change into a regular bird. If it was alive at the same time as modern birds, how can it be their ancient ancestor? Birds have also been found in the Jurassic limestone beds of Utah.

16: Modern birds have been found below it! Not only do we find modern birds in the same strata with Archaeopteryx,but we also find them below it!

"Perhaps the final argument against Archaeopteryx as a t***sitional form has come from a rock quarry in Texas. Here scientists from Texas Tech University found bird bones encased in rock layers farther down the geological column than Archaeopteryx fossils."Richard Bliss, Origins: Creation or Evolution (1988), p. 46.
Two crow-sized birds were discovered in the Triassic Dockum Formation in Texas. Because of the strata they were located in, those birds would, according to evolutionary theory, be 75 million years older than Archaeopteryx! More information on this Texas discovery can be found in *Nature, 322 (1986), p. 677.
http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/Encyclopedia/20hist08.htm

Easier to read than the first link...
http://www.harrypottermagic.org/17Devilution/ARCHAEOPTERYX.pdf

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

nakkh wrote:

You are a tiny minority. Think what you want.

Not tiny at all, and the trajectory is heading towards Creation not Neo Darwinian evolution. Regardless, popularity does not equal t***h.

nakkh Loc: San Mateo, Ca

In your small world I'm sure it is.
http://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/shaking_head_breaking_bad.gif

Racmanaz wrote:

Not tiny at all, and the trajectory is heading towards Creation not Neo Darwinian evolution. Regardless, popularity does not equal t***h.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

[quote=nakkh]In your small world I'm sure it is.

Love the usual empty rebuttal from you atheists lol, there will be relatively very few who will find the t***h.

Matthew 7:13
Enter through the narrow gate; for the gate is wide and the way is broad that leads to destruction, and there are many who enter through it. 14"For the gate is small and the way is narrow that leads to life, and there are few who find it.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Racmanaz wrote:

I don't have to prove God exist at all, I believe He exists already. It is you atheists that have to prove He does not exists. You evolutionists always claim that Neo Darwinian evolution exists when it is not scientifically proven yet I give many evidences on here that it does not exist. Now give me evidence that God does not exist.

Why do atheists have to prove anything at all? You obviously have no concept of "burdon of proof".

People like you keep trying to make the argument of the existence of the Divine. Atheists are not buying your argument and are mostly quite indifferent to your beliefs.

You seem to think that it is up to the people that you are trying to persuade that they either have to prove the non-existence of your God or that is proof that you are right. Apart from insisting that your opponents must prove a negative, you seem to forget that you and your "amazing videos" are the one making the assertion. Thus you bear the budon of proof.

If I beleve that you should worship the flying Speghetti Monster it is not up to you to "prove" such a thing does not exist. And your inability to prove the none existence does not, in turn, prove that it does exist.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

Why do atheists have to prove anything at all? You... (show quote)

No I do not have to provide "burden of proof" that God exists, YOU have to prove to me that God does not exists....you can't. The "burden of Proof" is only required and necessary in Judicial Courts not in a public forum. I have given many evidences against Darwinian evolution yet nobody can give burden of proof that God does not exists. The ONLY party "required" to provide "Burden of Proof" is the accusatory party.

Bazbo Loc: Lisboa, Portugal

Racmanaz wrote:

No I do not have to provide "burden of proof" that God exists, YOU have to prove to me that God does not exists....you can't. The "burden of Proof" is only required and necessary in Judicial Courts not in a public forum. I have given many evidences against Darwinian evolution yet nobody can give burden of proof that God does not exists. The ONLY party "required" to provide "Burden of Proof" is the accusatory party.

Elementary logic applies in all aspects of life, not just the legal system.

I have no burden of proof because I am not making the assertion that you believe as I do. I am indifferent to what you believe.

You evidence about evolution are mostly hogwash and I stopped responding to you a long time ago. I will leave it to others to eviserate your "arguments" and they do often. Personally, I find it embarrassing to respond to your drivel-it is like trying to reason with a child in the middle of a temper tantrum.

You have lost track of the difference between what you believe and what you know. You are a person with many beliefs but near zero knowledge.

Your beliefs are not knowledge and just because you believe something does not make it true.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

moabarch wrote:

I've kept away from these discussions for quite wh... (show quote)

Yet you come in here and comment lol, welcome to this thread :)

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

larrypayne wrote:

Lord Monckton is obviously a shill for the f****l ... (show quote)

Can you provide proof that "Lord Monckton is obviously a shill for the f****l f**l industry"??

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

Bazbo wrote:

Elementary logic applies in all aspects of life, n... (show quote)

That's fine, I do not expect anyone to change their mind on Neo Darwinian evolution as a fraud, many people deny the t***h as you have. Have a good day... :)

HEART Loc: God's Country - COLORADO

Racmanaz wrote:

You are correct, there are NO intermediate t***sitional forms in the fossil record and there are NO t***sional forms living today.

Yet RixPix, Silver, and others are perfect t***sitional forms for liberals that have failed to evolve into anything resembling common sense! :) :) :)

larrypayne Loc: Texas Hill Country

Racmanaz wrote:

Can you provide proof that "Lord Monckton is obviously a shill for the f****l f**l industry"??

Can you give any reason to believe he is not?