Frank T Loc: New York, NY

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/01/14/1357635/-Woot-Bernie-Sanders-Just-Screwed-over-the-Republicans?detail=facebook

Do they sign the Keystone XL Pipeline bill and acknowledge g****l w*****g or do they refuse to sign their own bill?

Gotta love Bernie. Let's see how this plays out.

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Do you really think that amendment will be added to the bill ?... If you do, you are delusional. As the article from that liberal website says, it's being debated, it's not a part of the bill. At least now there is debate in the Senate, unlike when it was Democratically controlled...

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

LOL.... G****l W*****g aka Obama's wet dream.... as the world moves on with their economies paying him and his delusional ranting no mind.

lARRY1 Loc: southern nc

IT's funny how the lib's use to say, "It's Man Made G****l W*****g"!! Now we hear only g****l w*****g. You guys need to forget Al and get own with your life.

dljen Loc: Central PA

Go Bernie! Love it. :D

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

You guys on the right really are a hoot.
Tell me. Does the GOP let you believe in gravity, or is that another liberal plot to keep you from flying?

Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga

Here is a little tidbit for you Frank...

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen on U.S. Senate climate v**e: It’s ‘bizarre’ & ‘ludicrous’ – ‘An attempt to hijack science for political purposes’

By: Marc Morano - Climate DepotJanuary 13, 2015 8:35 PM with 33 comments

Climate Depot Exclusive

Dr. Richard Lindzen – Professor Emeritus, MIT, Distinguished Senior Fellow, Cato Institute:

Dr. Richard Lindzen told Climate Depot:

“C*****e c****e is of course real; change being the normal state of affairs in climate C*****e c****e has caused catastrophic problems on occasion throughout the earth’s history While man may have contributed somewhat to c*****e c****e in recent years, his contribution to the above is highly questionable, and continues to be debated.

Moreover, the incidence of severe events shows no particular deviation from historical expectations. Attempts to claim otherwise represent an attempt to hijack science for political purposes. In the case of Bernie Sanders, a socialist, he is undoubtedly dreaming about nationalizing the energy industry.

For the US Senate to accept guidance from Sanders’ bizarre dreams is ludicrous.”

End Lindzen statement."

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Not to change the subject or hijack the thread, but I have noticed you heroine Indian Princess is still spouting her claim of not running for POTUS. I wish she would. That would be an entertaining cat fight between her and the Hildebeast! :lol:

phcaan Loc: Willow Springs, MO

Interesting and informative post Scott, a waste of time however, as the cheerleaders for the left will only listen to those who agree with them and dismiss all others as wingnuts or some other cute catchy label.
Liberals have a programmed pre-conception that can not be overridden. To them that is being open to new ideas, that they agree with. They have ideas and values instilled in them by some dope smoking, professor who got most of his live experience running to Canada to avoid military service in Vietnam. So you are truly the optimist thinking that you can actually present scientific evidence contrary to their programming that they will actually take seriously.

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

I guess that you missed the news that there has been no significant g****l w*****g in the last 15 to 20 years even though Carbon levels have continued to increase at rapid rates, I suggest that it is you and your flock that deny science Frank.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Do you accept that CO2 is what makes this planet warm enough to be habitable?
Do you accept that we are dumping CO2 into the atmosphere at unprecedented levels?
I'm not going to guess your answer to either of those questions but if you answer yes to both why is it such a stretch to believe we are effecting the climate.
If you don't accept either of these I can see why you don't believe. I'm not equipped to argue with you about it. If you post something I'll read it but I don't have the background to debate it.

lARRY1 Loc: southern nc

http://www.climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/ I guess everybody has an opinion.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Whew, another Algore sycophant... :wink:

Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.

There are plenty of prominent scientists who question the findings and direction of the science that you rely on for the claims that we much immediately change and disrupt our lifestyles and our economy in order to save the planet. In the meantime you guys celebrate our president's historic agreement with China which does very little to impact global CO2 emissions but does much to cripple our economy. The fact is that your side is so short sighted that you support our president making commitments to further restrict energy development and use in our society while giving China free reign to expand their emissions by up to 5X their current rate of CO2 emissions. China currently emits about 2X the amount of CO2 into the atmosphere as does the US, under our dear leader's agreement with China they have to change absolutely nothing for the next 18 years, they continue to grow their emissions without any restraints, but the US however has committed to significant reductions so much so that but 2033 China by the terms of the agreement could be emitting 10X the amount of CO2 that the US does.

Pretty Stupid if you ask me and a blind faith in a flawed science has led i***ts like our president to make s**tty decisions as the one outlined above. Our economy loses while world emissions continue to grow at an alarming rate.... Go figure, only a democrat could come up with such nonsense and actually proceed with it.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Spot on Blurry! :thumbup: