Why Canon
Jan 14, 2015 20:04:59 #
coyotecall wrote:
Do I "shoot weddings or medical..."? This is a redundancy! I shoot nothing painful.
most excellent :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 14, 2015 20:55:31 #
Jan 14, 2015 21:00:09 #
Jan 14, 2015 21:09:37 #
[quote=OonlyBonly]Lies, damn lies and statistics.
attributed to many.[/quoteu
U done dues a 2X post, did u pit the rig a mer gig in the what u ma call it?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
attributed to many.[/quoteu
U done dues a 2X post, did u pit the rig a mer gig in the what u ma call it?
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Jan 14, 2015 21:38:30 #
It seems that what started off as a light hearted thread, has turned into a pissing contest.
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Jan 14, 2015 21:50:48 #
Wellhiem wrote:
It seems that what started off as a light hearted thread, has turned into a pissing contest.
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Got that Bob Marley thing going have we?
Ooh, yeah! All right!
We're Trollin':
I wanna Troll it wid you.
We're Trollin', Trollin',
And I hope you like Trollin' too.
Ain't no rules, ain't no vow, we can do it anyhow:
I'n'I will see you through,
'Cos everyday we pay the price with a little sacrifice,
Trollin' till the Troll is through.
Yeah, got that one!....
Jan 14, 2015 22:09:16 #
JoeM wrote:
Well, I for one am a Canon guy that just recently is considering a Nikon. I have a Canon 60D that is seriously thinking about the purchase of the Nikon 7100. As I keep reading reviews that in most articles I've read the quality of the photos are better. Just a beginner so any debate as to another camera suggestion will be helpful!
Ya might want to look at the Canon 7D MKII.
Jan 14, 2015 22:45:53 #
Budnjax wrote:
I've watched a lot of sports and it appears most of the professional photographers I see are using the white lens with red circle.....Canon...
Nikon shooters have noticed that as well, much to their chagrin! :lol:
Jan 14, 2015 23:52:14 #
Swede wrote:
Well put!
Swede
:thumbup: :thumbup:
Swede
:thumbup: :thumbup:
I won't deny the reliability of Toyota, but, that's probably true of all makes of cars.
Jan 14, 2015 23:54:37 #
Jakebrake wrote:
Nikon shooters have noticed that as well, much to their chagrin! :lol:
In movies, product placement earns dollars for producers, could it be true of camera users too?
Jan 15, 2015 01:14:34 #
viscountdriver wrote:
In the classifieds why is it nearly always Canon for sale and seldom Nikon?
The answer is obvious, if you have a Nikon you are not going to get rid of it.
I await the insults.
The answer is obvious, if you have a Nikon you are not going to get rid of it.
I await the insults.
Your post is hardly objective and obviously slanted towards your preference of camera manufacturer's, and it's doubtful you're even looking for an objective answer, but:
Location's across the country will vary on camera preference. And of course some vendors advertise more than others.
It comes down to personal preference. Both are excellent camera's. Both centered in Japan, both Japanese brands.
Have you queried several major US cities for brand advertisement? And even if so, that's a poor measure of quality or number of sales. Sometimes it's not even a brand selection, but a cost analysis. An objective person would have no problem with a quality competitor, as Nikon is.
Personal preference my friend. Neither camera can be knocked. They are both excellent, and while one might do one thing better than the other, the slate is pretty even when the score is taken. And you'll go crazy trying to win an argument, simply by citing statistics.
It's been said that Mark Twain stated that there are 3 kinds of lies:
1 Lies
2 Dam Lies and
3 Statistics
Jan 15, 2015 01:45:24 #
Wellhiem wrote:
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Canon is best, get feckin over it.
Wellhiem, how do you expect anyone to feckin get over THAT?!?!
It's been more than TEN years now, and they're still in denial over who is #1 and who is #2!! :lol: :lol:
And that's a fact!!!!
SS
Jan 15, 2015 02:21:34 #
SharpShooter wrote:
It's been more than TEN years now, and they're still in denial over who is #1 and who is #2!! :lol: :lol:
And that's a fact!!!!
SS
It's been more than TEN years now, and they're still in denial over who is #1 and who is #2!! :lol: :lol:
And that's a fact!!!!
SS
You mean Nikon......right SS!!? :roll: 8-)
Jan 15, 2015 02:33:39 #
TucsonCoyote wrote:
You mean Nikon......right SS!!? :roll: 8-)
I rest my case! :lol: :lol: :lol:
SS
Jan 15, 2015 09:57:52 #
graybeard wrote:
In your dreams fella. No comparison. My son was a marine, but not a Nikon user. He scoffs at Nikon conceit, as do all thinking people. Nikon users are like the guys who would by a big flashy Cadillac and drive it around the neighborhood so everybody could see him in his big new car.
PS my Dad was a Marine and an Uncles as well in WWII and both in Korea also and quite decorated.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.