Which would you prefer? I am having trouble deciding on which on to get. Any suggestions?
I'm patiently waiting on the sidelines for this, hope we get some responses, this most likely will be my next purchase.
KB
Loc: Tennessee
I only have experience with the Canon 24-70 f2.8 L. It's a nice lens. Great for Landscapes,Portraits and low light situations. Check out the lens reviews at B&H or Adorama.
rg6guy wrote:
Which would you prefer? I am having trouble deciding on which on to get. Any suggestions?
Rg6guy,
Of the three the Canon 24-70 F2.8 is the way to go, much better lens, also it is sealed and weather proofed. Shoots superb photos, but expensive.
George
I like the Canons' 24-70 but the price. There is a new version coming out but at a bigger price! $2000 +. :shock:
What will you use the lens for?
What body are you using?
I shoot a 1/3 crop and the 24-105 is my choice for a general use lens. Wide enough for most applications and the extra 35mm on the long end come in handy. IQ between the 2 canon lenses is just about equal. Even though the 24-105 is only f/4, it's IS easily compensates for the one stop less light. Both are weather sealed.
If you are shooting a 1.6 crop you might consider the 17-55 2.8.
Can not comment on the Siggy as I have never shot with it.
Again, what you will be shooting and what body you use will have a big impact on which lens will be best for your purposes.
http://the-digital-picture.com/ has tons of good info on all canon lenses and a great lens recommendation section.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.