D800 v. D700 High ISO comparison: Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but...

MT Shooter Loc: Montana

Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but it looks like crap here next to the new D800, despite the triple megapixels in the D800.

http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/22/nikon-d800-vs-nikon-d700-high-iso-comparison.aspx/#more-34060

Erv Loc: Medina Ohio

That is amazing! But so is the price to some degree. For me, I have not reached the level to put it to good use yet. Maybe one day, but until I am happy with what my D300s and I put out. A new camera isn't going to help much.
Erv

ephraim Imperio

MT Shooter wrote:

Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but it looks like crap here next to the new D800, despite the triple megapixels in the D800.

http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/22/nikon-d800-vs-nikon-d700-high-iso-comparison.aspx/#more-34060

NIkon also just released a technological guide on the proper way to use the D800.

http://www.nikonusa.com/en_US/o/Y6wrkA9OU_z04IreazIXl_22UII/PDF/D800_TechnicalGuide_En.pdf

MT Shooter Loc: Montana

ephraim Imperio wrote:

quote=MT Shooter Looks like another home run for ... (show quote)

Cool. Now if I could just figure out where to get the money to buy it with!

ninjam Loc: Central Florida

Hey MT, what if any are the down sides of the D800 other than the high 36 MPs ?

MT Shooter wrote:

Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but it looks like crap here next to the new D800, despite the triple megapixels in the D800.

http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/22/nikon-d800-vs-nikon-d700-high-iso-comparison.aspx/#more-34060

MT Shooter Loc: Montana

ninjam wrote:

Hey MT, what if any are the down sides of the D800 other than the high 36 MPs ?

MT Shooter wrote:

Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but it looks like crap here next to the new D800, despite the triple megapixels in the D800.

http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/22/nikon-d800-vs-nikon-d700-high-iso-comparison.aspx/#more-34060

Only downside I can see is that I don't have the $3300 to order one with right now! Its like my D7000 all grown up! LOL

greymule Loc: Colorado

Cool. Now if I could just figure out where to get the money to buy it with![/quote]

How 'bout if we pool our money, buy a few, and time-share?

MT Shooter Loc: Montana

greymule wrote:

Cool. Now if I could just figure out where to get the money to buy it with!

How 'bout if we pool our money, buy a few, and time-share?[/quote]

OK, I will use it first and send it to you when I am finished.

greymule Loc: Colorado

MT Shooter wrote:

greymule wrote:

Cool. Now if I could just figure out where to get the money to buy it with!

How 'bout if we pool our money, buy a few, and time-share?

OK, I will use it first and send it to you when I am finished.[/quote]

Are you done yet?!

Bill MN Loc: Western MN

MT Shooter wrote:

quote=ninjam Hey MT, what if any are the down sid... (show quote)

English_Wolf Loc: Near Pensacola, FL

... Down side is the high resolution??? Man, what planet are you from? We are talking about real pixels, here not vaporpixels (extrapolated)

As to the price... Don't forget to the lens price as shooting with this and getting the most of it, you want FX lenses not DX.. So more like $6,000.00

Still not available so.... Wait.

English_Wolf Loc: Near Pensacola, FL

MT Shooter wrote:

Looks like another home run for the new D800. These differences are amazing! I know the D700 was rated very high for ISO clarity when it came out, but it looks like crap here next to the new D800, despite the triple megapixels in the D800.

http://nikonrumors.com/2012/02/22/nikon-d800-vs-nikon-d700-high-iso-comparison.aspx/#more-34060

Well, I took the time to look at the pictures and the first thing that comes to mind is: Why are the D700 pictures not in focus? This plays a lot when comparing noise as being out of focus distract. Isolate the part that are pure noise and.... LOOKS NEARLY THE SAME! The ISO appears 'finer and more evenly distributed' but that is due to the image not being compared correctly. Also the darker frames disrupt the eye appreciation so....

Marketing ploy at work here, sorry. Someone is deliberately trying to make the D700 look bad.

By NR admin Published: February 22, 2012 wrote:

.../... This Nikon D800 vs. D700 ISO comparison was initially posted on the techbang.com.tw and my understanding is that it was later removed. .../...

Because someone made the same or similar observations? Note that several folks in that forum mention the same observations.