how to get rid of Hilary
Nov 17, 2014 12:58:08 #
philo wrote:
I was agaist the idea of impeaching BHO because we... (show quote)
I don't think your idea holds much water...hell, you can't even spell her name. LOL
Nov 17, 2014 13:32:53 #
dljen wrote:
I don't think your idea holds much water...hell, you can't even spell her name. LOL
It's HHillary R Rodham CClinton. Ya got it now dimwit? ;)
Nov 17, 2014 13:36:09 #
Jakebrake wrote:
It's HHillary R Rodham CClinton. Ya got it now dimwit? ;)
Ummm, who's the Dimwit when you feel forced to correct me? Check the spelling of the OP's topic, Mr. Intelligent.
Nov 17, 2014 13:47:48 #
dljen wrote:
I don't think your idea holds much water...hell, you can't even spell her name. LOL
they can't fathom Every President Since Eisenhower Used Executive Authority On Immigration :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Nov 17, 2014 13:55:29 #
dirtpusher wrote:
they can't fathom Every President Since Eisenhower Used Executive Authority On Immigration :roll: :roll: :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Here's the link:
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/report-eisenhower-executive-action-used-immigration-n219466
Nov 17, 2014 14:03:07 #
"Let's think about how this may play out outside the right wing noise machine. Let's say you impeach BHO over this immigration business...you still don't have the v**es to to convict. Problem one."
You are correct the GOP are lacking the 67 v**es required. That means that people in his own party would have to go against him. I think he has pissed enough people off that want to do the right thing and be of service to the country, that may v**e that way.
It is time to quite playing games and get down to the business of the people.
You are correct the GOP are lacking the 67 v**es required. That means that people in his own party would have to go against him. I think he has pissed enough people off that want to do the right thing and be of service to the country, that may v**e that way.
It is time to quite playing games and get down to the business of the people.
Nov 17, 2014 14:07:11 #
philo wrote:
"Let's think about how this may play out outs... (show quote)
Time for executive action!!! Go Obama!
Nov 17, 2014 14:19:36 #
Nov 17, 2014 15:18:56 #
dljen wrote:
Ummm, who's the Dimwit when you feel forced to correct me? Check the spelling of the OP's topic, Mr. Intelligent.
Whew, good eye dimwit, it's actually spelled hilarious! :thumbup:
Nov 17, 2014 15:20:33 #
Oh no, dimwit and dirtdummy on the same thread. It will be a love fest now! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Nov 17, 2014 15:29:25 #
Nov 17, 2014 15:31:41 #
user47602 wrote:
here you go, jake...
I think there's a lot of spare room where his head is, User. :wink: :wink: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Nov 17, 2014 16:09:25 #
dljen wrote:
I think there's a lot of spare room where his head is, User. :wink: :wink: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Here's dirtdummy, dimwit and loser, oops I meant user! Dimwit is the one with the tattoo... :wink:
Nov 17, 2014 16:20:15 #
Nov 17, 2014 16:33:27 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Are you familiar with the section of UHH known as The Attic? I believe the Admin might move this thread there soon.
Arn't we there Art?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.