Good job Nikon
Nov 11, 2014 15:49:05 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
If you didn't expect any comments, why did you even post it ?...The "factual errors" was when you said they had not been manipulated, other than crop. Even back in film days, negatives run thru a processor were subject to color corrections by the processing lab machines. Are you aware of how that process worked ?. Plus images in a book are also manipulated. That was the "factual error"...
How many times do I have to say this. You completely missed the point. Maybe you should start over. Just so you understand, I mean the 1st grade. Next time I start a thread I'll just say I looked at the pictures in a book and leave it at that. :shock: :-D :lol:
Nov 11, 2014 15:58:50 #
RWR wrote:
Hang the precise definition of manipulation! I tak... (show quote)
??? You just repeated what Apaflo already said.
Nov 11, 2014 16:25:51 #
romanticf16
Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
Bill MN wrote:
Recently I purchased a book over 700 pages on how to ID trees and shrubs. The pictures were taken with a Nikon camera, with no post-processing except crop. Using a reference book like that the pictures have their natural color. I don't use PP anymore except to crop and sharpen. Mother nature dose a better job with color. I only like pictures straight out of the camera. If they don't look good I didn't have the camera set right.
I'd guess that the author either used a grey/white card or the X-Rite Passport to set his color balance while shooting RAW, then balanced all images to this one standard. It is the only way to insure consistent results under differing lighting conditions. Opps- I missed the fact it was film- bet it was all one emulsion batch, with a Macbeth chart photographed prior to each sample as a color reference for the printer who did the separations? Someone made everything neutral.
Nov 11, 2014 16:31:07 #
Amen to that I have a few books on different topics and I always went out and got the best I could get and then study it and go out and shoot.
Nov 11, 2014 16:34:18 #
LennyP4868 wrote:
Amen to that I have a few books on different topics and I always went out and got the best I could get and then study it and go out and shoot.
I just go out and have fun taking photos. Guess that must be wrong.
Nov 11, 2014 16:38:09 #
Architect1776 wrote:
I just go out and have fun taking photos. Guess that must be wrong.
What a crime!, you should be jailed! :lol:
Nov 11, 2014 16:42:23 #
thats what its all about having fun and enjoying the hobby and learning to take better photos
Nov 11, 2014 16:48:43 #
Larrymc wrote:
First, since I've been a member of UHH I've enjoye... (show quote)
Good response. I could not agree more. I read posts to inform and educate myself on issues that interest me. I am not interested in tirades and personal attacks that fail to follow the intent of the poster. Being civil is a virtue sometimes forgotten on the forum. Let us all be: polite, courteous, and respectful of all contributors. Obviously the human eye with 20/20 unaltered natural vision is the only "natural" visual attainable by humans; anything less (corrected vision) distorts reality just as a camera does.
Nov 11, 2014 16:49:53 #
Looks like I'm not the one who needs an education as there was no point to miss. Printers don't print the exact same image as they are tendered as the medium is different...Make sure you don't skip Kindergarten... :shock: :-D :lol:
Bill MN wrote:
How many times do I have to say this. You completely missed the point. Maybe you should start over. Just so you understand, I mean the 1st grade. Next time I start a thread I'll just say I looked at the pictures in a book and leave it at that. :shock: :-D :lol:
Nov 11, 2014 16:53:35 #
It comes with our up bringing and our age. We would get smacked by our father if we were disrespectful or not nice. Today is a whole other ball game and its really ashame to see how some people act. A lot has to do with the fact that they are on line. I wonder if they would be so bold face to face. This is a site to learn make friends and mix ideas and to enjoy the hobby. I agree with you 1000000000% keep the faith
Nov 11, 2014 17:07:53 #
Indiana wrote:
Good response. I could not agree more. I read post... (show quote)
Problem is, everyone can see things differently. So what one sees is different in some way to the other.
Nov 11, 2014 17:38:37 #
LennyP4868 wrote:
It comes with our up bringing and our age. We would get smacked by our father if we were disrespectful or not nice. Today is a whole other ball game and its really ashame to see how some people act. A lot has to do with the fact that they are on line. I wonder if they would be so bold face to face. This is a site to learn make friends and mix ideas and to enjoy the hobby. I agree with you 1000000000% keep the faith
Now days certain people have no respect for their elders. I wonder how many ever got a spanking or know what it was. I don't even remember how old I was when kindergarten was started. I always enjoy talking to older people, they lived longer so they are smarter just from what they learned in those extra years.
Nov 11, 2014 17:43:38 #
Screamin Scott wrote:
Looks like I'm not the one who needs an education as there was no point to miss. Printers don't print the exact same image as they are tendered as the medium is different...Make sure you don't skip Kindergarten... :shock: :-D :lol:
So that's my problem they never had kindergarten when I went to school. :-D
Nov 11, 2014 17:43:53 #
tamalero wrote:
Problem is, everyone can see things differently. So what one sees is different in some way to the other.
We all see visually the same (assuming 20/20 natural vision)...we just interpret the visual differently. If I ask you to write a short essay on what you see, and I do the same, we will have entirely different perspective on the same visual, and our essays will be completely different...to the point of whether or not we were even looking at the same visual. It is not what we see that is different, but rather how our mind interprets what we see that is different.
Nov 11, 2014 17:49:03 #
Indiana wrote:
We all see visually the same (assuming 20/20 natural vision)...we just interpret the visual differently. If I ask you to write a short essay on what you see, and I do the same, we will have entirely different perspective on the same visual, and our essays will be completely different...to the point of whether or not we were even looking at the same visual. It is not what we see that is different, but rather how our mind interprets what we see that is different.
That makes sense to me but someone may argue about that.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.