Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
End of "Still Photography"?
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
Nov 1, 2014 08:57:10   #
Djack41 Loc: Tennessee
 
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 08:59:10   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Not for me. I have zero interest in video :)

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:09:33   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


The only time my D7100 has been on video is the couple of times I have been playing with it. I have no interest in video. If I did, I would be using one of my 4 video cameras. On that shoots the old VHS, one that shoots 8mm video tape, on that shoot on regular DVD and one that shoots on the small DVDs. Yes, they are okay for what they do and all are very good amateur video recorders but, my interest is in still photography. (Heck I even still have my old 8mm film video camera but none get used.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2014 09:10:24   #
bigwolf40 Loc: Effort, Pa.
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Not for me. I have zero interest in video :)


Same here....Rich

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:12:22   #
MagicFad Loc: Clermont, FL
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


A resounding NO!

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:16:35   #
Xantoz Loc: Delaware
 
Video? No!! Wasted feature on my camera.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:23:15   #
jojo Smith Loc: Northern Michigan
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


no not for a lot of people including me

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2014 09:24:01   #
Bill Houghton Loc: New York area
 
I think what the OP is saying or trying stating, is a 30 mp picture with every frame. Presently each frame will give you about a 2 meg photo that is at best an medium grade photo. If you could record a bird in flight or a horse jumping a fence, the dog running threw the yard a 30 frames a second and have every one spot on. The yes, I see it as potential competition to the camera. I would be something to look into if your into action photography.

Just think of all wedding photos some of those machine gun photographers could post at 30 frames a second. LOL

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:27:28   #
jgordon Loc: Boulder CO
 
My sense is that still photographs will always exist. They stop time and allow us to focus on a particular moment and organization of visual elements.

Some movie makers clearly have a still photographer's sensibility and their shots linger on particular visual compositions -- but the style right now seems to favor hyperventilated and hyperactive visuals. I guess there is a place for that, but for me the act of making a still photograph is really different. And, if an artist wants his or her audience to focus on a still image, it seems reasonable for the photographer to do so in the creation of the image.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:30:32   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
If I wanted to shoot video I would have bought a video camera, which I have no interest in doing.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:32:15   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


While you can hang a video on the wall, no one wants to stand at a screen for 10 minutes watching a video of something that a good still photographer can create the essence of in a single snap of the shutter.. well ok maybe several snaps if it is HDR but a single photo. I don't think we have reached the point where people will have video monitors hanging on all the walls of their houses to show pictures of the kids, trips, etc. Video and Still each have a place in the photography world and supply a need.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2014 09:33:10   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


I wonder which would be more enjoyable.... pulling out all your 'video clips', or the photo album (or slide show), to share with friends?
I'll stick with stills for the most part.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:43:56   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


mine will not be used in that way for regular scenes though i still think video capture would ease macro shooting.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 09:45:00   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
Djack41 wrote:
Cameras will soon shoot 6k video. This allows anyone to shoot a video and every frame will produce 30 mp files. Will this end still photography, as we know it?


Maybe for videographers, but not for real photographers.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 10:09:50   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
Not for me. I have zero interest in video :)


Same here. My Df doesn't even have video.

Reply
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.