Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
New Orion Nebula for me
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 31, 2014 02:34:22   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
I finally got my Meade 8" collimated to my satisfaction.
Now all I have to do is learn to Focus it.
#1 Orion Nebula It is supposed to be orange & brown not purple. Any help Please???
#2 The Sun Original color
#3 The Sun Changed to B&W

Craig


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Second Effort
Second Effort...
(Download)

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 12:38:00   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
[quote=CraigFair]I finally got my Meade 8" collimated to my satisfaction.
Now all I have to do is learn to Focus it.
#1 Orion Nebula It is supposed to be orange & brown not purple. Any help Please???
#2 The Sun Original color
#3 The Sun Changed to B&W

Craig[/quote
Either way wonderful image round stars and great nebulosity. What was the exposure time?
:thumbup:

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 15:20:47   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
Either way wonderful image round stars and great nebulosity. What was the exposure time?
:thumbup:[/quote]

Thank you Astroturf,
The 2nd Andromeda Galaxy
30sec. f/9.5 ISO 3200 Manually pulled information out w/Lightroom. You would think it's a long exposure but it's not.
Feeble attempt at stacking, see all the double stars (Telescope drift). What I am after with this is the reality of the colors.
It's hard to know because of all the different photos out there.
I'm not done yet, I will get it right. I was hoping I could get some help from you guys here at APF. Settings, filters & PP.
Craig

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2014 18:41:39   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
Don't think stacking will help with telescope drift it may be polar alignment, gear backlash or movement elsewhere during exposure that's producing elongated or double stars. I keep iso 1600 or lower to reduce image noise.

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 20:58:03   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
astroturf wrote:
Don't think stacking will help with telescope drift it may be polar alignment, gear backlash or movement elsewhere during exposure that's producing elongated or double stars. I keep iso 1600 or lower to reduce image noise.


@ 1600 how long do you expose for?
I'm stuck with f/11 on the scope
Do you use a Flattener or Reducer to get lower F Stops

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 21:33:00   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
CraigFair wrote:
@ 1600 how long do you expose for?
I'm stuck with f/11 on the scope
Do you use a Flattener or Reducer to get lower F Stops


You could take about 6 shots at 10 sec and stack those= 1 minute of exposure and less or no elongated stars. orion is fairly brite. A reducer/corrector would also help by reducing your focal length and ratio.

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 22:25:08   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
astroturf wrote:
You could take about 6 shots at 10 sec and stack those= 1 minute of exposure and less or no elongated stars. orion is fairly brite. A reducer/corrector would also help by reducing your focal length and ratio.

Thank Astro I've been looking for that excuse to get that reducer/corrector.
It should also get all of Andromeda and Orion into view also.
Craig

Reply
 
 
Oct 31, 2014 22:55:05   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
CraigFair wrote:
Thank Astro I've been looking for that excuse to get that reducer/corrector.
It should also get all of Andromeda and Orion into view also.
Craig

Have a 11 inch cpc f/l 2800 mm f-10 added reducer/ corrector is now f/l 1764 mm f-6.3 37 percent reduction.

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 23:25:42   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
astroturf wrote:
Have a 11 inch cpc f/l 2800 mm f-10 added reducer/ corrector is now f/l 1764 mm f-6.3 37 percent reduction.


Celestron f / 6.3 Focal Reducer / Corrector 94175
It says it's good for Visual & Photo.
Craig

Reply
Oct 31, 2014 23:44:22   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
CraigFair wrote:
Celestron f / 6.3 Focal Reducer / Corrector 94175
It says it's good for Visual & Photo.
Craig


That's the one. I just leave it on.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 11:43:58   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
CraigFair wrote:
@ 1600 how long do you expose for?
I'm stuck with f/11 on the scope
Do you use a Flattener or Reducer to get lower F Stops


You might be able to get an adapter for your connector that makes it f6.3. I was able to get one for my ancient C8. It enabled me to get the full moon into the image.

I think it was about $70.

(Ah, I now see others recommended the same. It should work with your Meade.)

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2014 14:09:42   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
MtnMan wrote:
You might be able to get an adapter for your connector that makes it f6.3. I was able to get one for my ancient C8. It enabled me to get the full moon into the image.

I think it was about $70.

(Ah, I now see others recommended the same. It should work with your Meade.)

Thanks MtnMan
It should fit, Astroturf has one on his Meade and the ad says Celestron and Meade SCT's.
I do need to get the bigger Deep Sky objects in view at a faster f/stop & lower ISO.
Craig

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 14:15:36   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
CraigFair wrote:
Thanks MtnMan
It should fit, Astroturf has one on his Meade and the ad says Celestron and Meade SCT's.
I do need to get the bigger Deep Sky objects in view at a faster f/stop & lower ISO.
Craig

I have a celestron.

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 14:26:42   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
astroturf wrote:
I have a celestron.


Sorry Astroturf, I thought you had at least one Meade :lol:
Craig

Reply
Nov 1, 2014 15:41:54   #
astroturf Loc: vacaville ca.
 
CraigFair wrote:
Sorry Astroturf, I thought you had at least one Meade :lol:
Craig


:thumbup: :-D

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.