Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Which shot to use....
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 28, 2014 20:23:21   #
asjohnston3 Loc: Irving, TX
 
My wife sells wild Coho & Sockeye Salmon from Kodiak Island in Alaska (at the local farmer's market) which we get from her niece who lives their with her family part of the year. Kathy asked me to photograph a popular dish she created for her news letter. (Panko Crusted Salmon) I did the best I could (shot at night without proper lighting... not even a food stylist!!! :) ) The question is.... which shot to use?


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:30:58   #
Lenf Loc: Strasburg,PA
 
Number 2 looks a little more appealing, due the the lighter color . You could always send us a sample to taste for a real tru decision .

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:32:58   #
rizer Loc: Long Island, NY
 
I like # 2 as well.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2014 20:42:43   #
geolaval Loc: Laval, Quebec
 
I would pick the first because to my taste the second is too bright.

I would try something in between (which I did). But it all comes down to your taste and probably the outcome of this survey as well.

Cheers

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:49:35   #
TucsonCoyote Loc: Tucson AZ
 
#2

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:54:50   #
pgr Loc: Alabama
 
#2...can see more of detail....both are pretty photo's.

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:56:38   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
I prefer #1, #2 is to bright.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2014 20:58:58   #
GrandmaJoy Loc: North Carolina
 
Yummy. No. 2

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 20:59:57   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
On my monitor, image #1 is closer to proper exposure, retaining more detail. Image #2 is over-exposed.

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 21:02:15   #
OonlyBonly
 
#1. Fuller, richer colors to me.

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 22:59:34   #
1stJedi Loc: Southern Orange County
 
As a former Executive Chef and business consultant my response is: Neither One! Unfortunately, neither of these images showcases this dish the way you nice folks would like for it to.

You ABSOLUTELY must pay careful attention to lighting of all imagery used for food advertising. Personally, I question the plate design, as well as, the less than desirable lighting and background.

From my point of view, you might want to reshoot.

Reply
 
 
Oct 28, 2014 23:14:44   #
asjohnston3 Loc: Irving, TX
 
1stJedi wrote:
As a former Executive Chef and business consultant my response is: Neither One! Unfortunately, neither of these images showcases this dish the way you nice folks would like for it to.

You ABSOLUTELY must pay careful attention to lighting of all imagery used for food advertising. Personally, I question the plate design, as well as, the less than desirable lighting and background.

From my point of view, you might want to reshoot.

Your point is well taken and I actually had this very conversation with my wife last night. I prefer indirect sunlight, reflectors and much prep. time on the plate design. Shooting a food item really is an art form in it's self. Unfortunately, time constraints and my wife's mandates were the controlling factors this time around. (the newsletter e-mail goes out tonight) Sometimes you just have to play the cards you are dealt. Another shoot for a future news letter with my wife's Pecan Crusted Salmon is in the future. Hopefully I'll be given more lead time and some daylight hours for that one!

Reply
Oct 28, 2014 23:35:11   #
geolaval Loc: Laval, Quebec
 
ajohnston3 wrote:
Your point is well taken and I actually had this very conversation with my wife last night. I prefer indirect sunlight, reflectors and much prep. time on the plate design. Shooting a food item really is an art form in it's self. Unfortunately, time constraints and my wife's mandates were the controlling factors this time around. (the newsletter e-mail goes out tonight) Sometimes you just have to play the cards you are dealt. Another shoot for a future news letter with my wife's Pecan Crusted Salmon is in the future. Hopefully I'll be given more lead time and some daylight hours for that one!
Your point is well taken and I actually had this v... (show quote)


Albert, which one do you prefer and select for the news letter. I'm sure many of us are interested.

Reply
Oct 29, 2014 00:20:46   #
asjohnston3 Loc: Irving, TX
 
geolaval wrote:
Albert, which one do you prefer and select for the news letter. I'm sure many of us are interested.

I, personally am leaning towards #2 but the boss (my wife Kathy!) makes the final call... :) I'll find out when I get home tonight after the end of my shift... I'll let you know...

Reply
Oct 29, 2014 01:18:59   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
1stJedi wrote:
As a former Executive Chef and business consultant my response is: Neither One! Unfortunately, neither of these images showcases this dish the way you nice folks would like for it to.

You ABSOLUTELY must pay careful attention to lighting of all imagery used for food advertising. Personally, I question the plate design, as well as, the less than desirable lighting and background.

From my point of view, you might want to reshoot.


I don't think there is anything really wrong with the shots other than exposure. My preference is somewhere in between these 2, but #1 appears to be the better of the 2.

Too much of Advertising Photography is FAKE, FAKE, FAKE and doesn't impress me at all!! I would prefer seeing a REAL photo of the food on a menu, etc!!

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.